
Optimal Politics Co-creators
Let's earn our share of the $15 billion spent on political consultants
Prepare to satisfy the hunger for meaningful political change
Learn to replace political hostility with empathy
Learn to replace political selfishness with selflessness
Learn to replace political outrage with love
Fill out & send the form
Check your inbox
See you soon
Assumption Testing
Almost all of our beliefs include some error. Most of the time, such errors remain insignificant. But occasionally, acting upon inaccurate assumptions can cause trouble. Sometimes more for others you impact than for yourself.
Those in a position of power tend to hold onto unchecked assumptions harmful to those they impact. It can be safer for the relatively vulnerable to tolerate such errant assumptions than risk threats when speaking up.
This service instills the discipline of critical thinking to test our comforting beliefs.
This process checks each other's assumptions using the tools of artificial intelligence. Open the AI tool of your choice and type in the phrase "critique the assumption that" and follow with the assumption you or others take for granted. Here are some impactful examples using Google's Gemini AI.
Critique the assumption that...
-
people choose their political values from rational choice reasoning
-
empathizing with both sides of a debate is bothsidesism or false moral equivalency
-
emotions bias our thinking (actually, desperate needs prioritize relief-seeking, conveyed in emotions)
-
the adversarial judicial system rarely convicts an innocent person
-
conflicts are a zero-sum outcome in which only one side can win
-
we must have law and order to keep our depraved natures in check
-
mental health occurs primarily in one's mind and in one's chosen behaviors
-
morality is relative, so individuals must decide what is right and wrong on their own
Other assumptions to test yourself: "critique the assumption that ______"
-
we must focus on individual deviation from behavioral norms since these are enough to sustain wellness
-
wellness can be achieved by relieving pain without trying to understand what prompted the pain
-
we must maintain law and order for a functioning society
-
political platforms will provide satisfying results for my life
-
people are generally stupid
-
people are typically gullible and easily persuaded
-
people are generally untrustworthy
-
people would lie, cheat and steal if it wasn't for law enforcement
-
law enforcement keep the public safe
-
you can change someone's political stance with the right persuasive argument
Testing your untested assumptions
Powerholders acting on such poor assumptions risk exacting value from the relatively less powerful. Which undermines the powerholder's legitimacy.
Disingenuous democracy
From adversarial law to mutual principle
The adversarial law-based approach tends to favor those with better access to legal services. Gaining a legal win at the expense of the less privileged provides a short-term gain that cannot last, since inflexible needs will assert themselves. Both sides waste resources better invested in mutual understanding and support, to nurture the wellness of us all.
Responsiveness Status
Responsiveness Rating
Recipient has not yet responded.
Responsiveness Status
Responsiveness Rating
Recipient has not yet responded.
Text
Exaction Invoice
Impacted needs
M
Anxiety costs
$169
Needs
X
3 needs
$507.00
Depression costs
$102
3 needs
$306.00
Addictiveness costs
$90
3 needs
$270.00
Other costs
$163
3 needs
$489.00
Total
$1.572.00
This is not a bill. This conveys the hidden costs imposed, compromising efficacy. Follow the process here.
Responsiveness Status
Responsiveness Rating
Recipient has not yet responded.
Responsiveness Status
Responsiveness Rating
Recipient has not yet responded.
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Responsiveness Status
Responsiveness Rating
Recipient has not yet responded.
Rated responsiveness
We rate each other's responsiveness to needs, starting with the need-messenger's need for you to acknowledge their "I-need" message.


Earned legitimacy
Anankelogy, the study of need, distinguishes between
-
manipulable "ascribed legitimacy" and
-
evidence-based "earned legitimacy".


-
Firm yes. Yes,
-
Soft yes.
-
Equivocal.
-
Soft no.
-
Firm no.
-
No reply.
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
next step in this process
-
Firm yes. Yes,
-
Soft yes.
-
Equivocal.
-
Soft no.
-
Firm no.
-
No reply.
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Thank you for letting me know that you
what this means
next step in this process
Check your inbox


Onboard in 3 steps
1
DISCOVER
DISCOVER opportunity to help develop Optimal Politics
2
CONNECT
CONNECT online with the creator of Optimal Politics
3
ENGAGE
ENGAGE online with the creator of Optimal Politics
Click the tabs of the powerholder entities above to learn more about each step.
Law-Fit. Fit any relevant norms to the needs they ostensibly exist to serve. While no one sits above the law, no law sits above the needs it exists to serve. Laws are relatively arbitrary, while inflexible needs remain objective.
Wellness easily declines where law or authority imposes upon inflexible needs. This process prioritizes inflexible needs over flexible norms, for the benefit of all involved.
Exaction Invoice
Impacted needs
M
Anxiety costs
$169
Depression costs
$102
Addictiveness costs
$90
Other costs
$163
Needs
X
3 needs
$507.00
3 needs
$306.00
3 needs
$270.00
3 needs
$489.00
Total
$1.572.00
This is not a bill. This conveys the hidden costs imposed, compromising efficacy. Follow the process here.
Liberty Commitment
By liberty, we mean "the freedom to fully resolve our needs in ways with minimal or no negative impact upon the needs of others".
Properly resolve needs
Commitment to wellness
Mutuality over adversarialism
Incentivized good faith intent
Earned legitimacy
Best practices for competitive advantage
Free impact data
Assumption testing
Collapsible text is great for longer section titles and descriptions. It gives people access to all the info they need, while keeping your layout clean. Link your text to anything, or set your text box to expand on click. Write your text here...
Resolution of needs (path/plan)
Credit for contributing to improved outcomes
Contribute to our preventative mental health and receive credit
3. auditing politicos
4. co-creating Optimal Politics
Commitment to wellness
Collapsible text is great for longer section titles and descriptions. It gives people access to all the info they need, while keeping your layout clean. Link your text to anything, or set your text box to expand on click. Write your text here...
Contribute to our preventative mental health and receive credit
Title
1. political parsing
Optimal Politics begins with parsing the political behavior of politicos.
Assess Politicos to introduce OP
Learn how easy it is to assess their political quality
It's so simple and easy that anyone can do it. Because we let AI do all the heavy lifting. Each interaction follows this A-B-C format, that puts the negative critique between two positives.
Audit Politicos to demostrate OP value
We set ourselves apart by starting positive. We first affirm their value. We give no cause to trigger their defensiveness or self-righteousness.
Only after establishing our good faith intent do we bring up room where they can improve their political behavior. We can then list items exposing their lack of trustworthiness to independent voters.
Learn how to guide them from duopoly toxic politics to Optimal Politics
Co-create Optimal Politics
Take ownership and reap the rewards
We close on a positive. We invite them to prepare for the inevitable shift when we independents become the majority. This also incentivizes them to convert from toxic politics to our optimizing politics. For a price, of course.
.png)