Search Results

< Back Palmetto Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

There is no greater human authority than resolving needs with love. < Back H03 Love Principle List of all principles There is no greater human authority than resolving needs with love. Image: Pixabay – PublicDomainPictures (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more you can effectively resolve your needs while supporting others to resolve theirs, the less cause for human authority to intervene. Such authorities typically emerge to address those needs not already resolved. The more you can stay atop of your needs, while engaging and supporting others to resolve their needs, you negate the role of impersonal authorities in your life. Description Which do you think is more likely? Since no one is above the law, we all must submit to every authority. OR The ultimate authority stems from being able to function well enough to respect each other. Anankelogy The more your needs fully resolve, the less of any role authority plays in your life. When social love incentivizes you to respect the needs of others in ways inspiring them to respect yours, you fulfill the purpose of authority. You model a greater authority. The more your internal motivation of love enables you to fully function, the less you require any external motivating pressure of authority. Rational-legal authority typically assumes an extrinsic motivation . You’re expected to respect the requirements of law out of fear of punishment if you don’t. Once drawn to a situation, authorities typically doubt your respect for needs that laws exist to serve. If they must get involved and you’re assumed to violate some rule, then you must deserve some kind of harsh treatment to motivate your conformity to law and order. Consequently, law enforcement typically overlooks intrinsic motivations . Such authorities generally presume that you only respect the needs of others if facing a reprimand. Such a presumption gets baked into law enforcement culture. Which easily blinds them from your intrinsic love-incentivizing motive to treat the needs of others as your own. Need-response Need-response seeks and encourages need-responders with a love-inspired intrinsic motivation to more fully resolve needs. Especially among lawyers and counselors disillusioned by the shortcomings of law-based and psychological-based services and institutions. If you’re motivated more from a platonic love to honor the needs of others as your own, you’re naturally less concerned about minutia of laws or arbitrary demands of authorities. You see beyond mere cognitive processes or social order. You habitually fulfill the purpose of laws—which is to serve needs—by how you routinely and properly respect the needs at hand. The purpose of authorities then gets intrinsically fulfilled. With intrinsic motivation of your love, you likely rise above the minimal standards of law. You stretch beyond the law’s emphasis on harm reduction to resolve unmet needs that cause harm. You intuitively realize how resolving needs more fully removes cause for harm. The more incentivized by love, the more compelled to transcend those social norms that limit full human potential. If necessary, you risk transgressing some social taboos to properly resolve needs. You may even be willing to risk jail to stand up for a cause of systemically overlooked needs. Love compels you to a higher standard than mere law and order. Reactive Problem Shortsighted authorities abound. Confirmation bias and tunnel vision easily blinds them to their own projected ethical issues , projected moral failings , projected cognitive biases , projected cognitive distortions , project logical fallacies , and their own projected extrinsic motivations . Nature compels balance wherever imbalance creeps in. The more a society slides toward imposing social norms, the more nature compels some within that society to counter such repressive norms. They find some proactive way to respond more effectively to the needs those norms exist to serve. Wellness compels it. Shortsighted authorities may easily misinterpret these norm-defiers as lawbreakers, and totally miss their higher commitment to transcend imposing norms to directly serve our needs. Instead of appreciating the deeper love motivating this fulfillment of law’s purpose to serve needs, such authorities may seek to punish such need-serving nonconformists, to coerce them into line as they expect others would force them into fearful conformity. Their rush to squash need-serving nonconformists blatantly squanders the human capital to develop more of our full human potential. The lawfare against Julian Assange despite the lack of evidence that he ever induced Chelsea Manning to leak provides a clear example, after he helped alert us to U.S. war atrocities in the Iraq . Fully resolving needs often goes against the grain of law . Responsive Solution Anankelogy recognizes many need-serving nonconformists as “transspirits ”. I am one. A transspirit intuitively transcends divisive social norms to connect at a deeper level, to resolve needs. Even if resisted by the authorities. History provides many examples. Dr. King. Ghandi. Saint Paul. Jesus, Siddhartha Gautama, Lao Tzu, Hillel the Elder, and many more. Each transcended established norms to connect deeper with life, to address needs more fully and directly. Even if risking retribution from the authorities. As Jesus put it in Matthew 5:27: “I did not come to abolish the law but to fulfill it.” To properly resolve the inflexible needs which laws exist to serve presents as a greater authority than merely complying with arbitrary social norms. To resolve needs incentivized by love works far more effectively than placating authorities out of fear of possible punishment. Such transspirituality prioritizes love to resolve needs that supports improving wellness over law to relieve pain that risks perpetuating unwellness. Need-response asserts the higher effective authority of such transspirits, of those mastering love over laws. It assesses authorities’ responsiveness to our needs. It accredits authorities with “earned legitimacy ” when their impact results in improve wellness outcomes among their constituents. Need-response empirically rates any involved authorities at the lowest level of earned legitimacy , which is offensive illegitimacy . If processed in a need-response action , this could warrant a more severe response enforcement . Any self-righteous reaction, no matter how violent or nonviolent, can be deemed as validation of need-responders dedicated bravery to resolve needs over power-hungry self-serving authorities lacking legitimacy to impact the public. By sharp contrast, the transspirit seeks to properly resolve needs with love. Properly means they make sure resolving one set of needs does not negatively impact other needs. Love means they honor the needs of others as if they were their own needs—recognizing we are all connected, so the needs of others ultimately are their own needs. In short, there is no greater human authority than properly resolving needs with love. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: The more I try to respect others, the more some offensively disrespect me. While some authorities may indeed by shortsighted, I hate to be in a world without authorities. How can I tell the difference between a need-serving nonconformists and a selfish lawbreaker? I’d like to see how this works for others and the reactions they get before I stick my neck out. Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Refunctions List A refunction is anything in your life that raises your capacity to fully function. forgiveness The more you let go of your anger toward those who wronged you, the more your needs resolve. Read More Let go of your anger when wronged. Release yourself from your own self-chastisement. View any infringement of your rights as a mistake they can freely admit. Give others the space to honestly admit their imperfections. Rebuild trust by acknowledging your errors toward others. See how forgiveness resolves more needs. gentleness The softer you approach others in need of care, the more your needs resolve. Read More Be ready to give a softer touch where appropriate. Stay sensitive to those who appear alarmed by any harshness. They may be going through intense pain, or suffering some kind of trauma. Discern when a scalpel is better than a sledgehammer. Know where it's best to be humble yet firm. Tread softly through a field of wounded soldiers. Avoid reopening old wounds. Let your gentleness help them to more fully heal and grow strong. grace The more you humbly admit your current imperfections, the more your needs resolve. Read More Admit where you are honestly at in life, and not quite where you or others expect you to be. Release yourself from unrealistic expectations, and appreciate getting to your goals one step at a time. Allow room for unavoidable setbacks. Meet others where they are at, instead of where you may expect them to be. With more grace, observe more needs resolving. gratitude The more you show your thankfulness, the more your needs resolve. Read More Orient yourself to make the most of what you receive in life and avoid taking it for granted. Position yourself with your attitude to receive more of what your life requires. Affirm other's generosity toward you. Insist others not take your offerings for granted. Spur their gratitude by refusing their exploitation of your generosity. With more gratitude, observe more needs resolving. honesty The more others hear and trust you to speak truthfully, the more your needs resolve. Read More Say what you need to say without guile. Avoid manipulating others with words you know aren't true. Avoid putting yourself in a situation you feel you must deceive others. Nurture a reputation of being reliable in what you express. Be authentic. Hold others to a higher standard of being forthright with you. See how honesty resolves more needs in your life. humility The less arrogant you are toward others, the more your needs resolve. Read More Drop any pretense that you know best for others. Don’t cling too tightly to what you think must be good for yourself. Make room for others to face you honestly and interact with you as authentically as possible. Let your pride balance with your capacity to be critiqued. Nurture the humility in others by not provoking their defensiveness, but instead treating them with kindness. With more humility, see more needs resolve. justice The more you pursue what is fair for all, the more your needs resolve. Read More There is more to justice than grieving a loss due to violence. Step beyond mere relief to address your needs with others on par with them addressing their needs with you. Hold others accountable who try to ease their needs or wants at your unwelcome expense. While life isn't fair, interactions in relationships are either fair with balanced results or that relationship does not work. Instead of reacting with revenge, embarrass them by responding to their needs better than they respond to yours. Hold both sides to the same standard of conduct for any relation. See how substantive justice resolves more needs. kindness The more you pleasantly smile and encourage others, the more your needs resolve. Read More Refrain from harsh words. Give encouragement to those in need. Smile more towards others, even if they do not smile back. Let your smile sustain your positive attitude, especially in those moments when you don't feel like smiling. Yet be sure your positive regard stays sincere. Be an example of the level of kindness we all need for more civil interactions, leading to more meaningful lives. mercy The more you let go of your rightful reaction to being wronged, the more your needs resolve. Read More Be ready to let go not only of your anger, but let go also of your right to exact vengeance for a suffered wrong. Give more room to restore a damaged relationship by offering to forgo just compensation. Inspire their gratitude toward you with your readiness, willingness, and ability to clear their debts toward you. Engender mercy from others with your humility and remorse. Let your mercy demonstrate your love for others. See mercy resolve more needs. reconciliation The more you rebuild your trustworthiness after admitting a wrong, the more your needs resolve. Read More After letting go of your anger with forgiveness, continue nurturing the relationship by offering to restore any losses. Rebuild trust by compensating others for any damage for actions caused. Respect where others cannot go on without restoring what they’ve lost. Connect with others where they hurt, with empathetic generosity. Respond to other's gestures toward you who seek to rebuild any damaged trust. See how atonement resolves needs. 1 1 ... 1 ... 1

Placeholder Image symfunctional strain symfunctional strain < Back 3 symfunctional strain Symfunctional strain is the ongoing emotional stress from needs not fully resolved, limiting your ability to focus elsewhere and often mistaken as lack of intelligence. Need experience Each need you experience not fully resolved continues to compete for your attention. Compared to your more pressing concerns, most of these partially eased needs sit on the backburner of your conscious awareness. They remain in a queue, until evoked into full focal awareness. Meanwhile, your cognitive bandwidth shrinks . You find you cannot focus as fully and clearly on some things. Your persisting needs pull you for relief. They prioritize your thinking. They bias you. They compel you to do something for their relief, sometimes negatively impacting others outside of your awareness. “You’re being stupid!” they insist. Because it’s easy to conflate this cognitive contraction with lack of intellect, or lack of rational thinking, or with poor choices. They likely suffer this symfunctional strain too. When continually enduring unmet needs as a norm, it’s next to impossible to respect the needs of others. Symfunctional strain can slip into dysfunction, into projecting pain onto others, and other defunctions . Defunctionalizing Refunctionalizing Examples Relational knowing Sign up or sign in to view the full entry Complementary refunctions Conciliatory resolution 6/16/23 Previous Next

Wellness is psychosocial. < Back C07 General Principle List of all principles Wellness is psychosocial. Image: Pixabay – jplenio (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more you address your personal needs to the neglect of your social situational needs, the less you can maintain wellness. The more you address your social needs to the neglect of your personal situational needs, you will also lose full wellness. Your wellbeing counts on a balance of all internal psychological factors with relatively equal attention to all external factors shaping your needs. Description Which do you think is more likely? Mental illness occurs only in the mind so changing one’s thinking leads to mental wellbeing. OR Mental and physical wellbeing results from a mix of internal and external wellness factors. Anankelogy Anankelogy recognizes how the quality of your wellbeing depends equally on internal and external factors. This challenges conventional thinking in your favor. Wellness remains elusive when failing to complement its internal contributors with its external contributors. Conventional thinking around wellness, at least in a Western cultural context, tends to bend toward internal psychological and biological determinants . Much of psycho therapy assumes if you change enough of your thinking and behaviors you will attain wellness. Much disappointment soon follows. Only recently has the practice of psychiatry and related fields begun to acknowledge external socioenvironmental contri butors to wellbeing . A biopsychosocial model emerged in the late 20th century, but the old model persists. If you seek out healing, expect the internally reductionist paradigm to persist. After all, it can be easier to get a struggling individual to adjust to a sick system than to cure an immensely large sick system. When the impersonal healer objectifies the body of those hurt by society, they don’t have to face the possibility that they’re contributing to the ongoing damage. If all of your anxiety about losing your job springs from unfair yet legally protected actions from your boss, psychotherapy may not be the answer. Perhaps the psychotherapist can help the client nail the source of their anxiety to a situation beyond their personal control. But then what? Need-response Need-response picks up there. As a new professional practice, it starts with the foundational premise that wellness is psychosocial . Anankelogy recognizes how your wellbeing gets shaped equally by internal bio-psychological factors and socioenvironmental factors. Instead of trying to integrate a new biopsychosocial model or vulnerability-stress model , need-response begins with a holistic premis e of wellness . Instead of assuming society functions well with its current alienating norms (privileging avoidant adversarialism ), need-response works to reconnect us with each other to optimize our personal and collective wellbeing. Need-response’s holistic approach goes further and includes a spiritual dimension. Anankelogy recognizes that recurring spiritual practices dependably correlates with resolution of needs. For example, the more you vulnerably trust Creator G-d when acknowledging being too powerless to face a crisis on your own, you “inexplicably” can find ways to rise above the problem and find a meaningful solution. Social sciences recognize moderate correlations between two variables as significant because of the complexities involved. Anankelogy dares to apply this to the objective fact of each unchosen need . Reactive Problem The less we appreciate wellness as equally internal and external, the more we can get pulled into what anankelogy recognizes as psychosocial imbalance . You either address your sensitive self-needs at the expense of your affected social needs , or you address your sensitive social needs at the expense of your affected self-needs . For example, exaggerating your self-need for privacy to the point of neglecting your social need for intimacy . Or becoming overdependent on others to satisfy your social need for supports that you underserve your self-need for self-initiative . Your body then warns you with emotional pain that something here is not quite right. We often react to this emotional pain with “psychosocial vacillation ” of swinging between the extremes of “reductionist individual ism ” and “ex aggerated collectiv ism ”. We attach ourselves ideologically to generalizations trusted to ease this emotional tension. We take a political side to cope with our troubled psychosocial orientation . Full wellness remains disturbingly elusive the more we cling to civic legalism for relief. That’s when we prioritize obedience to laws or to social norms over serving the needs for which laws and norms exist. Wellness actually declines the more avoid its psychosocial foundation. Where do you go for professional help to address a load of anxiety overwhelming your life from some situation? Seeking psychotherapy can be fruitlessly stigma tizing if implicitly expecting to adjust only your internal factors. Seeking legal or political help can become counterproductive if only offering some pain relief after adjusting some external factors. Responsive Solution Need-response was created to equally address the internal biopsychological factors and externa socioenvironmental factors impacting your wellbeing. No other professional service exists that recognizes wellness as psychosocial from the start. Only need-response sets you up to resolve your affected self-needs and social needs equally. Only need-response provides for psychosocial balancing your self-needs and social needs . Only need-response seeks to fully resolve each other’s affected self-needs and social needs . Responsivism begins at the individual level. But when held back by impenetrable social pressures, such responsive services can segue into a robust wellness campaign . The service client learns how to speak truth to power (STTP ) in ways those powerful are incentivized to listen to those impacted (LTTI ). Everyone’s wellness requires psychosocial balance . For example, many among the wrongly convicted innocent cannot be adequately served by either psychotherapy or legal resources. Psychotherapy may help them get through the consequences of an unresponsive judicial system, but the external contributors must be addressed. The legal system of the adversarial judicial process has yet to faithfully identify and address each viable case of wrongly convicted innocence. Innocence projects cannot serve each viable case of compelling innocence. If the available facts of the case do not present a path to reverse the wrongful conviction, even if they can see grounds for innocence, such innocence litigators typically will not serve the innocent claimant. This includes a population estimated in the tens or perhaps hundreds of thousands. But our current legal system lets them all rot. Responsivism takes a different approach. Instead of the court’s binary options (i.e., pass-fail, guilt-innocence, defendant-complainant), “responsive innocence ” automatically scores the viability of an innocence claim. It invites the claimant to compare the details of their case to known exonerations . The more the claimant can cite factors producing other wrongful convictions (e.g., misidentification, official misconduct, tunnel vision, debunked forensic science, coerced confession), the higher the innocence viability score. This unique approach goes even further. It upends this impersonal and adversarial legal framework to serve the needs for which laws exist. The falsely accused claimant identifies what they see as the affected needs of the accuser or accusers. Then they can raise their own impacted needs. They respond to the needs of all involved, including the prosecutor and law enforcement authorities. The self-needs and social needs of all get addressed, toward better wellness for all. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: I’m in therapy now with an MSW and she does address the social dimensions of my problem. Sounds like psychosocial imbalance may have a lot to do with political extremism. Where does the spiritual dimension fit into this psychosocial balance approach? Correlations spotted in spiritually related results seem highly disputable. Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

< Back AZ Justice Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

Power is not really ‘power’ unless resulting in resolved needs. < Back F04 Authority Principle List of all principles Power is not really ‘power’ unless resulting in resolved needs. Image: Pixabay – kareni (click on meme to see source image) Summary Any authoritative power not resolving needs acts more like a coercive force. The more those in position of power serve their own interests at odds with the affected needs of the powerless, the less legitimate their influence. The power of the socially influential only exists because of the deeper power of nature shaping our objective needs. The more any social power invests their social influence to resolve nature-created needs, the more meaningful and legitimate its influence. Otherwise, it’s often guilty of coercive exploitations. Description Which do you think is more likely? We must respect those in positions of power over us to extrinsically maintain the social order. OR We must reserve “power” for what restores full wellness to intrinsically sustain the social order. Anankelogy The concept of influential power depends largely on the greater power of our underlying natural needs. Apart from needing another’s approval, for example, no one has any influential power over me. The deeper power of nature driving my need for another’s opinion of me fuels the existence of influential power. When indigenous people speak of power, they typically refer to this deeper power of nature driving our needs. Nonindigenous discourse tends to regard the “power” of social influence on par with the “Power” of nature. Without nature’s power to compel us to depend on others, there is no influential social power. The more we flow with the greater power of nature to resolve our needs, the less potent the “power”of social influence. The less our needs resolve, the more vulnerable we are to the influence of those we trust to hold things together. The more those in influential positions of power impede resolving our needs, their “power” presents more like a privileged weakness. Only when power leads you to resolve your needs can that power be respected in full. Social influence that manipulates us away from resolving needs, and coerces us to endure more suffering, lacks legitimacy . When forcing us to settle for less than our full functioning wellness, it is power in name only. Need-response The other social sciences generally accept the conventional definition of power. They see power as compelling social influence. Anankelogy’s nature-based paradigm requires a deeper view of power. Anankelogy and need-response recognize the deeper forces of nature shaping our needs. Apart from the greater power of nature driving our needs, there would be no lesser power of social influence. The more we try to control nature, the more we alienate ourselves from the power of nature to resolve needs. The more alienated we become from resolving our needs, the more drawn to social influence to cope with the resulting pain. The more we settle for the lesser power of social influence to manage the pain, the fewer of our needs can actually resolve. Pain is not the problem as much as the threats our pain exists to report . The more we allow social power to distract us from our pain and needs, the more that pain likely returns . There is no such thing as pain apart from unmet needs , but we generally prefer our familiar yet dull pain of unmet needs over the sharper pain of unknowns of fully resolving a need. In other words, social power easily robs us from enjoying natural power. Reactive Problem The less your needs resolve, the more your body persists in grabbing your attention with intensifying emotional pain. To cope with that pain to address needs beyond your control, you naturally seek some kind of relief from outside of yourself. Professional pain-relievers come along and offer you hope. You latch on. You’re soon pleased by gaining some relief. Any relief will do. Now you’re hooked. Your psychiatrist hooks you on reuptake inhibitors , so you never have to resolve the needs causing you depression. Your favorite news outlet hooks you on outrage porn , so you never have to resolve the needs driving the conflict. Your political leaders hook you on indulgent side-taking , so you never have to resolve your need for community cohesion or address your painful feelings of isolation. You give them “power” over your unresolved needs. Your unresolved needs persist to alarm you with ongoing pain. The longer you feel alienated from others, for example, the more you suffer loneliness and agonizing despair. So you return to your familiar source of pain relief. You socially give “powerholders” your permission to influence you. And for some reason we call this “power”. But such social influence is actually weakness. We have it tragically backwards. We resign to regarding such potent social influence as “power” when it would not even exist if we related better to nature’s power driving our needs. Settling for the “power” of social influence exposes us to manipulation, exploitation, coercion, and settling for alternatives to resolving needs . All in the name of power. Responsive Solution Let’s now get right to how this principle can solve that problem. . For now, this serves as placeholder text. When I find the time, I will post the full deal here. How does this speak to your experience of needs? Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Glossary U unchosen need (n. ) Any requirement to function that automatically exists, independent of any volition. E.g., solitude, water, social acceptance, sleep, self-determination, food, comradery. This points to the principle that a natural need is an objective fact . This works as another term for an inflexible need or natural need . Contrasts with a chosen response to such a need. unchosen priority (n. ) Any required necessity to address something essential to function that automatically exists ahead in importance of another essential matter for functioning, independent of any volition. E.g., requiring solitude now instead of social interactions or requiring sleep now instead of physical activity. This points to the principle that an organically prioritized need is an objective fact . A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

< Back Wisconsin Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back After Innocence not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back Duke Law School Wrongful Convictions Clinic not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back 3. Balancing masculine protection with feminine nurturance Do you seek to fulfill the role of protector of your loved ones? Or do you fit more into a role of being their nurturer? Masculine focused If you're more rational than emotional, your needs best met with a more emotional emphasis naturally seeks some balance. One way nature prompts you to fill this void is through sexual energy, to compel you to pursue the complementary emotionality you currently lack. Whether stereotypically in a woman or perhaps in an emotionally attuned man. The less you integrate your rational qualities with emotional maturity, the more prone to swing between extremes of irrationality and unemotionality. For example, _________ The more you blend your rational qualities with emotional maturity, the more needs you can resolve and remove cause for pain. For example, becoming both reasonable and intuitive enables you to _________ Feminine focused If you're more emotional than rational, your needs best met with a more rational emphasis naturally seeks some balance. One way nature prompts you to fill this void is through sexual energy, to compel you to pursue the complementary rationality you currently lack. Whether stereotypically in a man or perhaps in a rationally minded woman. toward balance Cyclic balancing of these gender-associated traits Vacillating between opposing extremes Balancing complementary sides Oscillating toward a balanced center Encountering the holistic center Transspiritually compelled holism Conventional reaction to transspirituality The more attached to conventional norms, the more one tends to guard the comforting familiarity of pragmatism creep . text text Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 8:58:14 PM UTC Previous Next