Search Results

Welcome to the complementary profession of need-response. Who watches the watchers? Executive Summary [TLDR] Need-response emerges as a new professional service to complement, or potentially compete with, the adversarial judicial system to serve the public’s justice needs. Only need-response emphasizes understanding the unresolved needs fueling conflicts, and how to more effectively respond to such needs. We invite everyone working within the judicial system to engage this fresh approach to serving one another’s underserved needs.   Thank you for your service Wherever you serve the public in helping us all to stay safe and orderly, we thank you for your service. We appreciate how challenging it can be to reach just outcomes amidst our human complexities. The Anankelogy Foundation  can provide you some helpful insight to unpack those complexities, with its new proposed professional service of need-response .   This visionary service seeks to support your efforts to address and resolve justice needs. We address the justice needs of the people based on this new social science of anankelogy , the disciplined study of need.   Every need persists as an objective fact Foundational to this new academic field is the empirically based assertion that core needs exist as objective fact . Need-response as applied anankelogy exists to serve such “ inflexible needs ”. Such needs can never bend to serve arbitrary laws  or the authorities that exist to address such needs.   Consider the implications of this vicious cycle. legalism cycle The more one suppresses their inflexible needs to appease authority, the less they can fully function. The less they can fully function, the less capable they can comply with every legal requirement. The less they comply with every legal code, the more easily targeted by law enforcement. The more targeted by law enforcement, the more prone to suppress their inflexible needs to appease that authority. Back to square one.   Trapping us in pain of our unresolved justice needs An ethical dilemma emerges. The more the impersonal approach of law enforcement elicits poor outcomes benefitting its practice, the more motivated reasoning can blind judicial officials from its own role in such poor outcomes. The more you benefit as an institution from the negative situations you arguably help to create, the less incentivized to produce just outcomes for the people.   We appreciate how police must take an adversarial stance when apprehending someone presenting a threat. After such a person gets placed in custody, we see less room to impose adversarial assumptions. But we recognize such adversarialism is built into the very structure of the judicial process. Need-response can complement law enforcement’s adversarialism, in ways not normally contemplated by ADR or arbitration options. It can illuminate the biases that adversarialism often impose. Moreover, it can potentially produce more just results by incentivizing those in a conflict to first exhaust all possible mutuality options.   We do not presume adjudicated individuals, either complainants or defendants, as oppositional. We first affirm their inflexible needs that cannot be changed. Then we address the improper ways they behaved to redress such needs.   We cast a broader net to explore both internal factors and external factors shaping their options. We stay clear of either extreme: victimhood (overemphasizing external factors) or hyper-responsibility (overemphasizing internal factors). We hold ourselves accountable to produce just outcomes, in ways rarely if ever seen in the judicial process.   No longer exclusive The high volume of unsolved crimes , along with underreported violence , countered by estimated high rates of wrongly convicted innocents ,  suggests you could use a fresh approach to serving our justice needs. One less tied to the imposing constraints of advers arialism , and less beholden to constructs of law not held accountable to empirically measurable outcomes. In other words, prioritizing substantive justice over procedural justice.   To serve this noble goal of resolving more justice needs, need-response asserts a radical claim:   Anyone in the adversarial judicial system has the   privilege and not the exclusive right to serve the justice needs of the people .     In the U.S. Declaration of Independence, Jefferson hints to this necessity for an alternative when a government slips into tyrannical tendencies, or worse.   "All experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed."   In other words, creeping normalcy  coerces us to adjust to institutions creeping from their mission  to serve the people in a just democratic society. Without any other option, the people acclimate to the mounting pain of their unresolved justice needs. Consider the evolved dependence upon plea deals to avoid overwhelming the court docket. Consider how this avoids guaranteeing every accused defendant of their constitutional right to a fair trial. Then consider this as mission creep on steroids. As the sole institution available to the public to address their justice needs, the adversarial justice system receives little incentive to improve outcomes. True to the American adventure of competition, need-response now presents itself as the incentivizing market force to improve just outcomes.   Opening a new path to resolve persisting needs In contrast to Jefferson’s rhetoric, need-response does not seek to abolish the current forms of the judiciary, but instead to complement it, and where necessary to compete with it, to identify, address and resolve justice needs.   We invite you  to learn with us how to utilize need-response to better fulfill your mission to serve justice needs. You can partner with us, as we extend a warm welcome to support a client’s noble wellness goal . One client at a time. Status quo institution Need-response alternative Justice means procedural; process focused substantive; results focused Approach adversarial; win-lose approach mutuality; win-win approach Service serve flexible laws & powers serve inflexible needs Offer relieve pain of survivors remove pain by resolving needs Responsibility focus risk objectify individuals psychosocial balance Legitimacy ascribed; coax public trust earned; earn public trust Aim maintain social order improve overall wellness Perspective myopic; reductive to what’s manageable holistic; attentive to all Manifest outcomes toxic legalism; poor need orientations social love ; improved need orientations Or you can drag your feet, delay your response, resist our intent, and even oppose our efforts. All under color of law. But we must address inflexible justice needs, with you or without you. And let the people democratically decide which they prefer. But the reality of inflexible needs is never legitimately up for any vote or court opinion.   Let us help you resolve justice needs Resisting inflexible needs is never an option. Those who do under color of law become professionally and personally complicit  in the rising number of poor wellness outcomes, like major depression, severe anxiety, recurring addictions, and deaths of despair. Need-response offers such officials an off-ramp from such damaging objectification.   Instead of always processing a mounting pile of troubling cases, need-response can potentially reduce that load as it cultivates greater responsiveness to the inflexible needs spilling into violent incidents. Need-response aims to get to the source of our problems, which points to our persisting unresolved needs. You can either be a part of this fresh alternative, or see how it helps others improve their lives and their careers.   Any injustice in the name of justice We start with viable claims of innocence that can be independently verified. We investigate the biases of judicial officials, starting with prosecutors, who delay justice more for their own purposes than the public interest for a just society. We methodically explore limitations within the adversarial legal process, but not in an adversarial way. We invite the wrongly convicted with a viable innocence claim to correlate their case with those already exonerated. We calculate the degree of their likely innocence instead of imposing a black-and-white guilt or innocence category. In other words, we aim to improve identifying the wrongly convicted innocent with a more scientifically valid process.   In case their estimated innocence fails to provide a timely, just outcome, we offer them the opportunity to demonstrate their responsiveness to all involved in a conflict. We incentivize all to fulfill the purpose of law, which is prosocial behavior toward each other. That includes incentivizing questionable authorities to be equally prosocial. Inviting you to help shape this pioneering approach We are testing a radically fresh approach. We link you with a sample of those you impact, so you can improve your effectiveness in enabling them to resolve their justice needs. This provides you the opportunity to improve your legitimacy  to serve a wary public.   By offering you sponsorship opportunities, we help you nurture the public’s trust by helping you respond more effectively to their underserved justice needs. Much better than currently possible by applying the law alone.   Learn more… For a more informed decision, learn more at AnankelogyFoundation.org . Follow us on the Need-Response podcast  to keep informed how this new professional field of need-response is taking root and growing.   Let’s grow a better society together by holding each other accountably responsive to each other’s inflexible needs . Let’s incentivize each other to move past adversarial acrimony and impersonal alienation to make room for our untapped potential for more platonic love .   If we don’t, who will?   Respectfully,   The Anankelogy Foundation

Love as honoring the needs of others as one's own Which do you think is best? We must regard laws as the highest standard for our behavior. OR Love serves as a higher standard for our behavior over mere law. Anankelogy puts our needs under the microscope. And examines how we address our needs. Need-response as applied anankelogy looks at the results. It finds the motive of love more powerful and legitimizing than the lesser power of law. How you address needs predicts wellness outcomes. Consider these seven options. The last unleashes our potential to love one another more, to honor the needs of others as our own. Improperly relieving pain of unmet needs Properly relieving pain of unmet needs Improperly easing need s Properly easing needs Improperly resolving needs Properly resolving needs Bronze standard Silver standard Gold standard Platinum standard Love as the highest standard 1. Improperly relieving pain of unmet needs You can address your painful needs by chiefly relieving your pain in ways that impose upon the needs of others. By "improperly", we mean antisocial. If I attempt to relieve the pain of feeling insulted by you by hitting you in return, then I am "improperly relieving my pain". You may hit me back, which ensures I suffer more pain. Besides, my need to feel respected will persist unresolved. 2. Properly relieving pain of unmet needs You can address your painful needs by chiefly relieving your pain in ways that avoid imposing upon others. By "properly", we mean prosocial. You could drink plenty of alcohol to numb your emotional pain, for example, but stay home alone instead of venturing out to drive. You "properly relieve your pain" by not risking the safety of others in the process. But your pain persists. Whether improperly or properly relieving your pain, your wellness outcomes likely results in a level of dysfunction . You find you must prioritize relieving your pain of your unmet needs. You risk becoming addicted to "substitutes" that can only numb your pain. They do little to nothing to improve your wellbeing. Your ability to function remains compromised, leaving you trapped in perpetual pain. At least until you can resolve those needs. 3. Improperly easing needs You can seek to ease your needs in ways that in some way impose something on others. You partially resolve your needs, but in a way that impedes others from resolving their need. Fully resolving your needs could be out of reach for you. You indulge in pornography, for example, to placate your burning desire for intimacy. You ignore the fact that the young women in the video were obviously coerced into performing acts for your viewing pleasure. 4. Properly easing needs You seek to ease your needs in ways that do not impose on others. You partially resolve your need, but in a way that only negatively impacts yourself. Avoiding any harm to others is noble, but can trick you into rationalizing your doing alright. You consume plenty of junk food, for example, when you cannot make enough time to prepare a healthy meal. You force yourself to fulfill all of your social commitments, despite your declining level of energy. Whether improperly or properly easing your needs, your wellness outcomes likely results in a level of symfunction . You find you must prioritize easing your unmet needs. The more you rely on "alternatives" that partially eases your needs, the more you risk slipping into a symfunction trap . Which becomes for many a gateway into dysfunction. 5. Improperly resolving needs You can try to resolve your needs fully in a way that hinders others from resolving their needs. You momentarily get to restore yourself to full functioning, but at the involuntary expense of others. If I fully quench my thirst by stealing a bottle of water from you, then I am "improperly resolving my need" for water. Sure, I can get back to fully functioning. But at the cost of your ability to restore full wellness. 6. Properly resolving needs You can attempt to resolve your needs fully in a way that does not hinder others from resolving their needs. This serves as the best approach, the best way to address your needs. If I fully resolve a need I am experiencing, and my actions or inactions does not harm you in any way, then I am "properly resolving my need". This can be broken down into four degrees, each characterized by a prized metal. A . The bronze standard - Your actions to resolve your needs fully mildly inconveniences others. E.g., while at a restaurant, you carefully select and purchase only the food your body requires, which forces some to wait a little longer in line. B . The silver standard - Your actions to resolve your needs fully has no impact upon others. E.g., you invest your personal time staying in shape with healthy physical exercise. C . The gold standard - Your actions to resolve your needs fully actually helps others. E.g., you promptly shovel snow from your sidewalk after a snow storm, which allows passersby to not risk slipping on ice as they must walk past your house. D . The platinum standard - Your actions to resolve your needs fully helps everyone. E.g., you fully resolve your need for meaning in life when sacrificing it to save all life on earth from an impending disaster only you can stop. 7.   Love as the highest standard Need-response asserts the higher standard of properly resolving needs. The more you can prioritize respecting the inflexible needs of others as your own, the more you can inspire others to respect your inflexible needs. Not always, of course. But with sufficient skill and grace, such " social love " takes us much farther than typical modes of privileged selfishness. Need-response encourages and incentivizes the development of such love in us all. Whether improperly or properly resolving your needs fully, your wellness outcomes likely results in a level of peakfunction . You prioritize promptly resolving your needs fully. You enjoy access to "primary" resources that evolved to restore you to full functioning capacity. You do not need to be wealthy to reliably access such primary resources. But economic security correlates with sustainability of a peakfunction level. Without such a love-centered commitment to honor the needs of others as our own, we easily fall back on reliance upon laws to tell us how to behave. Authority enforcing laws relies blindly on external motives. Love nurtures sustainable internal motives. The internal motive of love can outlast the external motivation by laws or authority. Need-response nurtures our underutilized potential to be more loving to each other. The power of love transcends the supposed supremacy of law. Need-response can complement efforts by law enforcement authorities to improve our responsiveness to each other's vulnerable needs. Or need-response can compete with legal authorities by outperforming their legalis m . The more we can properly resolve needs with the power of love, the less we fall prey to legalistic tyranny. Need-response holds us all accountable to honoring each other's inflexible needs, including legal authorities. Need-response asserts this as the higher standard of love . And dares to challenge the legitimacy of any authority whose imposing actions correlate with poor wellness outcomes, such as anxiety and depression. Wherever law seeks to reign supreme, need-response challenges the results. And dares to assert the supremacy of love as a standard higher than law. Anankelogy asserts that there is no greater authority than resolving needs with love . Need-response lets our untapped love reign supreme. back-to-top

Optimize your online innocence narrative with these helpful criteria Apply these standards mostly to your Summary . But these also apply to your Synopsis and other elements of your Innocence Profile . Use these criteria to get the most out of your publicly available innocence narrative. A. Entice your viewers Grab attention . Keep the viewer engaged. Speak directly to obvious pain points. Find a way to motivate the reader to say to themselves, “Oh, I’ve gotta read the rest of this!” Twists . Use this popular device in movies. You take the reader down one path, then abruptly switch up. For example, you called the police to report a crime, then the police showed up to arrest you! This prompts the viewer to keep reading, to find out how this could be. Write in the 3rd person . Instead of saying “I” or “me”, use your name. Let your descriptions seem like they are from a neutral, less partial observer. Write concisely . Consider the short attention spans of your readers. Avoid giving them any reason not to scan your whole profile. Clarity . Avoid any confusion. Cover the who, what, where, when, why and how in as few of words you can. Replace anything that sounds even a little confusing.   B. Keep your viewers Check spelling and grammar . Use a free service like Grammarly to ensure your writing is free from simple mistakes. Read it aloud . Listen for mistakes you hadn’t noticed. Does it sound engaging? Does it flow naturally? Try improving it to sound like more like a natural conversation. Rewrite . Don’t settle on your first draft. Edit the weak spots. Replace passive verbs with an active verb. For example, replace “I was accused by my mom” to “My mom accused me.” Use descriptive language, that can provoke imagery in the reader’s mind. Avoid too many “is” and “are”. Replace them with more descriptive verbs. Avoid jargon . Don’t assume viewers know the abbreviations or less common terms you use. Keep the language accessible for anyone.   C. Respect your viewers Nonjudgmental . No accusations about corrupt DA or judges, even if they are corrupt. Simply describe what occurred and trust the viewer to judge for themselves. No anger . No ALL CAPS shouting at the reader. Trust the viewer to empathize with your plight. Defy stereotypes . Write with a language that exemplifies your innocence. No cussing. No defensiveness. No condescending rhetoric. Give no reason for others to doubt your integrity. No doxxing . Leave out any personal information about others that could expose their privacy. Don’t publish their address, as you wouldn’t want them to publish your private address. Transparency . Admit your shortcomings. Everyone is imperfect. Cultivate trust with being humble and upfront about your mistakes. Be specific . Don’t exaggerate. Without getting too wordy, give the viewer the essential details.   D. Inspire your viewers Suspense . Tease their curiosity. Leave out less important stuff that you can always share later. Entice their interest to know more, which can motivate them to follow you online. Appreciate the viewer . Be thankful they invest their precious time taking interest in your story. You could even thank them as you wrap up your narrative. CTA . Close with a call-to-action. Suggest a simple thing the viewer can do to help support your innocence. For example, “You can show your support by signing my petition below.”   Improving your innocence profile together Use examples that have been posted for a while. Let them model how you can improve your own innocence narrative.   Ask a friend to read your first draft. And second. Invite their feedback. If you go onto a public exoneration campaign, they may be among your first passionate supporters.   Share these criteria with them. Then ask them to rate your innocence narrative on each of these points. Of course, thank them for their help.   Improve your innocence narrative until you’re satisfied it’s ready for public viewing. But don’t wait for perfection. Get your story out there so people can see the injustice you daily endure.   Together, we can improve not only your innocence narrative, but this platform. To ultimately improve our chances for exonerating the wrongly convicted innocent like you.

First read the instructions to the sender. Fill out as many fields as you can. You can always change them later, after we go over the tool together. Keep in mind this not a counseling session or legal advocacy. The aim is to identify and resolve the inflexible needs on all sides of your situation. With responsivism, we can do that together. I help guide you to incentivize the professional to respond to this alternative to unpleasant legal options. I cannot guarantee they will respond or cooperate. I can promise you that responsivism is better positioned to improve your wellness, and potentially theirs, than either psychotherapy or the services of an attorney. Review the cancellation policy to avoid any unpleasant surprises. Now let's start improving your wellness by having you speak to power in a way they are incentivized to listen to you. With the power of love, or honoring the needs of others as one would have others honor their own.

We go through each of the most common HR job interview questions. You can suggest your own questions you anticipate they may ask. You receive insightful feedback. I have helped hundreds of other job seekers around the world to more confidently present their credentials. I can help you rise above your nervousness to confidently position yourself as the best candidate they are interviewing. We can even move on to the tech interview, if you like.

First session is free. If you find value in it, please show your appreciation with a donation. Offer what you can afford to help us sustain this for you and for others. We take Law-Fit to a deeper level, called "citationization". We go through a series of steps to mold the flexible apparatus of law to address inflexible needs. 1. GETTING STARTED To gage any improvement, we first get a baseline of your initial wellness level. We will review your personal information. You have the option to pay for this service out of pocket or to invite others to invest in your supported effort to speak truth to power. As they participate in your wellness, their wellness can improve. We can discuss how this crowdfunding approach can make a profound difference. 2. CONTEXT We will unpack the power relations you find yourself in. And then explore how they affect your wellbeing. We will incentivize these powerholders to shift from legal adversarialism to supportive mutuality. We will prioritize resolving each other’s needs over mindless compliance to laws. 3. CHALLENGES We will likely face some challenges on the way. Some powerholders may resist. We will address those things you should be able to solve on your own. If you take the crowdfunding route, we will invite your supporters to help you tackle some of these challenges. They will gain something along the way. 4. OPPORTUNITIES We dive deeper into law-fit with the ‘citationization’ process. What is the intended purpose of the cited law? How can we know if it’s working as intended? What about any unintended side effects? We shift from alienation to mutual engagement. We may discuss the option of scaling this up into a full ‘wellness program’. We can explore if going this route with a ‘wellness warmup’ is right for you and your situation. 5. ROADMAP We equip you to speak truth to power. We roll out need-response to powerholders in four key steps: 1) NRI: This introduces them to this pioneering alternative. 2) NOI: We let them know we are now applying this process specifically to them. 3) MOU: We negotiate how to better serve each other’s needs. 4) NRA: We avow to resolve your needs with or without their cooperation. 6. OPTIONS We can wind down when those in positions of power finally fit your inflexible needs to flexible laws. We can explore what you could do next. Or decide to end it here. Keep in mind this service is completely new. It will likely evolve as we use it in real time.

Cases of innocence falling through the cracks of the appellate process get pick up by innocence projects. But where do they go after falling through the cracks of the innocence project? They can go here. We address viable claims of innocence outside of the adversarial legal process. We remove legalistic biases that neglect actual innocence. Public Exoneration If you're a wrongly convicted innocent, where do you go if the Innocence Project declines to review your viable claim? Appellate Process Your innocence gets overlooked by the biases built into the adversarial judicial process. Innocence Project Your innocence is better appreciated, but forced to fit into the adversarial judicial process. Public Exoneration Your innocence gets heralded outside their legalistic blind spots, compelling the courts to respond. 1. Your estimated innocence score This service is for those who have demonstrated their actual innocence using the Estimated Innocence Form . You can download your own copy here . 2. Your public innocence profile This service works best when your viable claim of actual innocence is profiled on th e Unexonerated page. Check it out for yourself right here . 3. Your public exoneration in 5 phases This engaging alternative to the adversarial legal approach has yet to be fully tested. It will be tested by the designer, a wrongly convicted innocent. Public Exoneration is a type of problem-solving "wellness campaign ". The innocence claimant, or their proxy representative, is served by a professional need-responder , which is a new kind of professional. They guide the process. Instead of serving the law as lawyers do, or championing one party against another as the role of attorney does, the professional need-responder helps you resolve each other's inflexible needs as a way to solve the problem of wrongly convicting the innocent. Instead of helping you to change your cognition and behavior, or trying to ease your emotional pain, as psychotherapists do, the professional need-responder helps you solve the persisting problem of the wrongful conviction, which causes the emotional pain. The professional need-responder helps you address problems occurring at four different levels . The Public Exoneration wellness campaign addresses each level in each of its phases. While this service cannot guarantee it can persuade the court or prosecutor to officially exonerate the client, it can assure you that if all affected needs get properly addressed, it will significantly move the needle toward full exoneration of the wrongly convicted innocent client. To get a quick idea of what the program looks like, click each tab below to learn about each of the five phases. To see one in action, scroll down below. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a foundation displaying your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Publicly establish your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT A preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. Two types of Public Exoneration Public Exoneration offers two types of wellness campaigns: Custodial . For those still in prison or under parole or probation. The innocence claimant assigns a proxy with power of attorney to represent their interests. Noncustodial . For those discharged from prison or never sentenced to prison. The innocence claimant typically represents their own interests. Click here to learn more details about a Public Exoneration wellness campaign. Would you like to see a Public Exoneration in action? The best way to learn about a public exoneration is to follow one as it occurs. It is free to follow. Go to the Unexonerated page. Browse through the Innocence Profiles . Pick one you see is similar to the case you support. Then click the button to follow the campaign. Follow PE 1 Follow PE 2 Follow PE 3 Follow PE 1 1/3 Clicking the button opens this Exoneration Support form. 1. Select whom to support. 2. Select the 'follow' level. 3. Provide your name & email. 4. Click the Submit button. Check your inbox for directions. Follow developments Public Exoneration is being developed by Steph Turner, cohost to the Need-Response podcast . Steph will share developments of this new program in episodes published every other Wednesday. Listen along as Steph tests the program, who also is a wrongly convicted unexonerated innocent. Start your own Public Exoneration When ready to start your own Public Exoneration problem-solving initiative, click the Select button below. Choose when you want to start. The first thirty days are free, to give you time to invite backers to help cover the cost in a crowdfunded format. NOTE: Price and options may change as we grow the service to better fit your needs and the needs of others. Need-Response Public Exoneration $199.99 $ 199.99 Every month Solve your stubborn problem of overlooked innocence by mutually resolving needs Valid until canceled 30 day free trial Select Why charge any money for this? "Why isn't this free?" you may wonder. Why should you pay for a service to try to undo something that someone else caused? Fair enough. Charging you a fee keeps us accountable to serving your specific interests. You have little say over innocence lawyers or court appointed lawyers who provide their services pro bono. Their accountability tends to shift toward those who fund their services, instead of remaining accountable to you. Besides... this is far cheaper than hiring a lawyer! By contrast, you and your team can hold the professional need-responder accountable because you and your team directly pays for the service. Spreading the costs to your growing support team ensure there are more people to whom we remain accountable. We think of this more as your investment in improved outcomes, not some legal expense. Besides, as others support your cause, they receive benefits along the way. They improve their responsiveness to needs like yours. With public exoneration, we all help each other to reach more of our lives' potential. We all learn to love each other more, to honor the needs of others as our own. Is that not worth $200 each month? Your freedom is worth far more than that!

The Unexonerated Publicize my innocence Estimated Innocence This page serves as a public space for those who have downloaded the Estimated Innocence Form , and are ready to share their results. If you're an innocence claimant, download your own EIF right here. Estimated Innocence Form Innocence Profiles Profiles of those identified as a wrongly convicted innocent who remain unexonerated Esitimated Innocence : When compared to cases already exonerated, each of these present an estimated degree of likely innocence. These represent viable innocence claims repeatedly overlooked by the adversarial legal system. And underserved by the under-resourced innocence movement. Where their legalistic approach fails, the new professional service of need-response offers the alternative of Public Exoneration . Most or all of these cases have: 1. Exhausted their appellate remedies without getting their wrongful conviction fully reversed, 2 . Sought help from innocence lawyers at least once, sometimes many times, 3 . Declined legal help from innocence lawyers each time they asked for help, 4 . Was never declined because they were told their case lacked merit, but for technical reasons, and 5 . Assert "actual innocence" in that they had no role whatsoever in the alleged crime. NOTE: A high score does not necessarily assure actual innocence. Nor does a lower score absolutely exclude full innocence. - no criminal history - always maintained innocence - transphobic & homophobic prosecution - no corroborating evidence Steph MI asexual trans person sentenced to lifetime sex offender registration Wrongly convicted of : child sex abuse I want to support Likely innocence 89 % View full profile PE: - burn patterns were junk science - witness testimony debunked by evidence - key witness lied to police - investigators ignored true motive Peter NY witness lied to protect the actual perpetrator Wrongly convicted of : arson I want to support Likely innocence 75 % View full profile PE: - coerced eyewitness misidentification - forensic expert misinterpreted lab results - investigator manipulated evidence - jail informant lied Ricardo NY coerced into a plea deal to avoid deportation Wrongly convicted of : human trafficking I want to support Likely innocence 92 % View full profile PE: - ex related to CPS official - previous wrongful conviction - witness lied to save self - threatened with life sentence Sabrina TX coerced into plea deal by threats to take her kids away Wrongly convicted of : child endangerment I want to support Likely innocence 81 % View full profile PE: - hung jury at first trial - no criminal past - clear Brady violation - noble cause corrupted investigators Terrell CA untested exculpatory DNA evidence lost by investigators Wrongly convicted of : manslaughter I want to support Likely innocence 83 % View full profile PE: - alibi witness threatened to change story - victim regrets photo misidentification - identical crime occurred when held in jail - original investigator now supports retrial Samuel CA victim recants misidentification and alibis were never investigated Wrongly convicted of : selling drugs I want to support Likely innocence 71 % View full profile PE: - key witness original person of interest - key witness destroyed key evidence - key witness owed victim over $200K - likely Brady violation Matthew NJ accused of murder by witness who had a motive to kill the victim Wrongly convicted of : homicide I want to support Likely innocence 77 % View full profile PE: - false testimony by accuser - accuser withheld exculpatory documents - refused plea deal - accuser falsified banking transactions Brenda IL verbal contract for startup loan spun as embezzlement Wrongly convicted of : embezzelment I want to support Likely innocence 86 % View full profile PE: - victim previously assaulted defendant - victim violated restraining order - Brady violation of withheld autopsy - victim had shared suicidal thoughts Marcus FL 2nd autopsy shows signs of suicide but jury never saw it Wrongly convicted of : homicide I want to support Likely innocence 84 % View full profile PE: 1 1 ... 1 ... 1 Latest to benefit from Public Exoneration Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Backers of a profiled innocent Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Sponsors of a profiled innocent Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Name , Title Share the amazing things customers are saying about your business. Double click, or click Edit Text to make it yours. Exoneration Services Appellate Process Innocence Project Exoneration Services When the appellate process failed to recognize and correct this miscarriage of justice, you turned to an innocence project. Or perhaps to a conviction integrity unit. But where do you turn when they also fail to recognize and work to correct this miscarriage of justice? Consider exoneration services . Keep hope alive! Estimated Innocence Let the facts of your case automatically calculate the viability of your innocence claim. FREE For innocence claimants or their proxy For innocence litigators Innocence Profile If you are a wrongly convicted innocent, or support one who is, fill out the Estimated Innocence Form and have it posted here for free. Post your own innocence profile Public Exoneration Step beyond their adversarialism with a mutuality process that deals more honestly with your actual innocence. $199.99/mo., crowdfunded For innocence claimants or their proxy Follow developments of exoneration services at our Need-Response podcast . New episodes drop every other Wednesday. Click the image to learn more. Interact with this content and with each other on our The Unexonerated group on Facebook. Join this private group if you haven't already. The Unexonerated The Unexonerated The Unexonerated The Unexonerated Interact directly right here.

Stay up to date about the podcast and its reporting on developments of the need-response service. Check our milestones. Read our press releases. Stay informed. Podcast newsroom Podcast description Welcome to the podcast showcasing the new professional service of ‘need-response’. The show introducing you to this new alternative to our failing institutions. If disillusioned with the legal process or disappointed in psychotherapy, this podcast is for you. And for you if you’re a disillusioned lawyer or a disaffected psychotherapist yearning for a career change. Steph and Gustavo invite you to join them each Wednesday morning on an inspiring journey to co-create this new professional field. To speak truth to power with the power of love. Need-response is about solving our general problems by resolving our specific needs. One bold act of love at a time. Need-Response media kit hardcopy Podcast seasons Developing the need-response service with potential users creates the key purpose for the podcast. Each season follows a stage in its developmental arc. Thanks to inspiration from the "I Want Product Market-Fit " substack and Gust de Backer , we anticipate the podcast seasons to roughly follow this diagram. Season 1 follows the formation of this new service. Disillusioned lawyers and disillusioned psychotherapists could be the first set of qualified need-responders learning to provide this pioneering service. Season 1 consists of two overlapping phases. - Phase 1 lays down the foundation for this visionary service of need-response . Offers listeners hope to solve problems with our inspiring and loving alternative. - Phase 2 invites and onboards new members to the Need-Responder Community . Provide opportunity to help create a meaningful alternative to our failed institutions. Season 2 begins when Steph becomes the service's first guinea pig client. Steph will test the service to see if it can establish innocence independent of the slow moving adversarial legal system. Season 3 begins when enough qualified professional need-responders can start providing the service. And then test the service's initial supply and demand, for its early price point. Season 4 begins when the service is ready to offer to the public. We expect the podcast to then feature testimonials from those uniquely helped by the service. Season 5 could branch off into specializations of this service. From helping those deep in medical debt, those burdened by student debt, those yearning to overcome political polarization, and other potential applications of this uniquely inspiring service. Target audience Our ideal listener feels exasperated by our failing institutions and seek to do something meaningful about it. They're either vulnerable to such failings or work in the systems they know are failing their clients. The adoption curve serves as our trusted guide. $25/month $5/month FREE PATRONS SUPPORTERS FOLLOWERS What is 'toxic legalism'? Contributor - for those eager to help create this new service with their skillset and means. Supporter - for those wanting to help shape this new service to fit their needs. Follower - for those wanting to become familiar with this new service. Innovators: Contributor members Listeners who are disillusioned lawyers and disillusioned psychotherapists. We encourage them to learn to be the first trained professional need-responders. They help us work out the bugs to establish this new service. Contributors are typically among the first prospective clients, who test the process and help tweak it, who are open to trying something untested, who have the need for this service and can eventually provide this service to future clients, and many will be cultivated to become the first staff of the servic e, including the first professional need-responders. We anticipate most will be disaffected lawyers and counselor attracted this to approach that satisfies much of what they find lacking in the practice of law and the practice of psychotherapy. Early adopters: Supporter members Listeners who urgently need this alternative of need-response. They explore how to be among the first clients and team members of a wellness campaign. We encourage them to provide testimonials vouching for the service’s potential. Supporters are typically prospective clients after the service gains traction, who will be among the first to try the service as early adopters; they act as something of an ad hoc board, who oversee the service’s development with a vote on key issues. Early majority: Follower members Listeners who require an alternative to law or psychotherapy. The podcast orients them to the possibilities of need-response and a wellness campaign. They can help popularize the service. Followers are typically the first to support another’s wellness efforts, who wait and see it can be of help to their particular situation and needs; to orient them to this fresh approac h. Our target audience Podcast features UPDATES Follow the show for updates on the development of the need-response service. We'll share the experience of speaking truth to power, and debrief the results with you. Plus much more. SHARED CLIPS Paid subscribers helping to test this service share their experience with you. Uploading short audio clips we can use on the show is one of the perks of a paid subscription. ILLUMINATION Get insights into how your needs work from the perspective of the new social science of anankelogy, the study of need. VIDEO CLIPS View bonus clips and additional shorts we produce as a video. Plus much more. Milestones Each milestone is to be announced publicly, with help from press releases. 1 January 2025 13 March 2025 26 March 2025 16 April 2025 23 April 2025 30 April 2025 TBD Publish the trailer to the Need-Response podcast Invite disillusioned lawyers and psychotherapists to explore this new opportunity to co-create a more effective client-centered service. Invite all lawyers and psychotherapists to become acquainted with this new service of need-response by listening to our upcoming podcast . Announce to all legal institutions the rollout of this new approach to addressing needs outside the adversarial paradigm. Tease the "Need-Response" podcast with episode 0 . Launch the "Need-Response" podcast with episode 1 . Launch the first pilot wellness campaign , with Steph as the guinea pig first client. Which will test the legal process's responsiveness to needs. Press Releases A new service could fix the damage from past transphobia and homophobia The new service of ‘need-response’ seeks to correct lingering transphobia and homophobia 13 January 2025 Read full press release ‘Need-Response’ Takes on Our Failing Institutions Lawyers and psychotherapists are about to face some competition 30 January 2025 Read full press release A new podcast wants to solve your stubborn problems The new podcast introduces a new problem-solving service called need-response 30 March 2025 Read full press release Calling All Disillusioned Lawyers A promising new professional service seeks disillusioned lawyers to help create it 20 January 2025 not yet available Calling All Disillusioned Psychotherapists A new professional service could destigmatize therapy by changing external conditions 20 January 2025 not yet available Prosecutors May Soon Face Competition Innocence claimants may have an alternative to the adversarial process for exoneration TBD not yet available Progress Updates Each of these provide a string of summary updates individually publicized in the Need-Response podcast . Need-Responder Community members receive in-depth updates. A visionary service called 'need-response' launches its own podcast The "Need-Response podcast" sparks interest in the new ‘need-response’ service. 17 May 2025 Transcript of update The 'need-response' service gains a footing addressing the problem of wrongful convictions "Need-response" fills gaps in the adversarial judicial process. 20 July 2025 not yet available The Anankelogy Foundation files for its 503(c) nonprofit status The Anankelogy Foundation oversees the new service of need-response, keeping all accountable to properly resolving each other's affected needs .. 28 September 2025 not yet available Spotify Amazon Castbox iHeart PlayerFM YouTube NR Clips