
Search Results
Is this what you were looking for?
302 results found with an empty search
- Glossary | AnankelogyFoundation
Anankelogy, and its application in need-response, introduces a new vocabulary to give you insight into this fresh understanding of our needs. Glossary A new social science and professional field introduces a fresh vocabulary of new terms. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z This replaces the first glossary, which began as a blog post. That post froze up once the volume of new terms overwhelmed that post's capacity. This site links these new terms back to this glossary blog post. Once every new term can be linked back to this new glossary, that post will likely be deleted. GLOSSARY This new social science of anankelogy and its application in the new profession of need-response brings you a new vocabulary. VOCAB Steph Turner Oct 22, 2023 I created this revised glossary in late January 2025. The bolded entries identify new entries you will not find in the old glossary. You can sense the development of some of these concepts by comparing the new glossary with this older glossary.
- Innocence Index
Innocence Index Each listed person here was wrongly convicted of a crime for which they demonstrate that they had no role. Go to Innocence Profiles Case status: "public" or "state" We classify each innocence claim as either 'public' or 'state'. Each "state" case has been picked up by the DA office of that case's jurisdiction. Each "public" case remains in the domain of public discretion to either properly respect the identified innocent or to slip into complicity of "innocence offending ". "public" or "state" Case preview triage We invite the DA office to consider these cases of viable innocence. We presort the claims for their prompt review. Innocence index We invite the public to reaffirm the rights of these wrongly convicted innocent persons We replace any ' innocence offending ' with public support. Innocence Index: case preview triage The index will appear here in a moment If it doesn't, try reloading the page. What is "innocence offending"? Innocence offending is when anyone treats a wrongly convicted innocent person as if they are guilty, such as abridging their rights under color of law because of their false status as a 'felon'. An 'innocence offender ' refers to anyone who mistreats the wrongly convicted innocent person as if they are guilty. Learn more...
- Needs
Needs List safety A Read More 1 1 ... 1 ... 1
- D06 Pain Principle
Any unquenchable desire becomes another pain. < Back D06 Pain Principle List of all principles Any unquenchable desire becomes another pain. Image: Pixabay – jplenio (click on meme to see source image) Summary The less you can resolve a need, the less you can function. Which feels painful. The less you can replenish what your life requires to function, the more your body warns you of this limitation as a threat. If unable to eat anything all day, you experience your obsessive hunger as something painful. Talking about pain can also refer to the painful desires you can ever adequately satisfy. Description Which do you think is more likely? Pain is pain and desire is desire and there is little these have in common. OR Unsatisfied desire can present as a threat that you experience it as a form of pain. Anankelogy If you haven’t eaten anything in over a day, your craving for food naturally grows intense. Eventually, your hunger feels painful. Your body warns of a threat to your access to food. And you feel that warningas a form of pain. Just as “biostructural pain” sends missed warnings to your body to experience, you can also experience in your body the missed signal to replenish something emotional. The more you ignore your feelings of isolation and loneliness, for example, the more your body may warn you of this threat to your full functioning by prompting you to feel intensely hungry for interpersonal connection. You know when you misinterpret this feeling as literal hunger when the feeling persists no matter how much you eat or drink. When feeling a burning hunger even after enjoying a full meal, ask yourself, What must I replenish in my life? When feeling thirsty for something sweet or for something intoxicating, ask yourself why? What emotional need have I been neglecting? Dig deeper still and you may realize you are not so much missing the message but feel powerless to do much about it. Need-response addresses these deeper causes to your unquenchable desires. Need-response Need-response challenges our popular consumerism reactions. Instead of placating any hunger or thirst with something pleasurable to eat or drink, we drill down to identify and address your neglected emotional needs. Reactive Problem The more powerless you feel you can fully satisfy your emotional needs, the more vulnerable to reacting to your unquenchable desires. Conventional wisdom touts willpower and your responsibility to make proper choices. But you can only choose options available to you at the moment of these emotional and physical needs. If you require a moment of solitude to reconnect with your authentic self, but must acquiesce to powerful pressures to forgo solitude—less you lose your freedom or means of income—no amount of willpower or right choices will matter much. Such popular philosophies, although grounded in reliable wisdom, tends to pull us into reacting to our pain. To distract us from ultimately resolving our painful needs. Responsive Solution Need-response address the power relation dynamics that easily interfere with your ability to fully resolve all of your needs. The NR301 program equips you with a viable way to incentivize the powerful to respond better to these overlooked needs. You learn to approach them as an equal. You’re both human, with real human needs. You both prefer less pain. You both can cause less pain in the other. You both can do more to mutually respect each other’s vulnerable needs. The more you can help each other to resolve each other’s affected needs, the better you can address your own unsatiable desires. There is no such thing as desire apart from some need to replenish what your body reports as lacking. If the primary resource you need to fully function proves inaccessible, your body suggests an alternative . If that’s unavailable, you can always pursue some substitute that only eases the pain. But if those in powerful positions seek legitimacy, let them enable you to access more of the primary resources your life naturally desires to fully function in life. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: How can I tell the difference between emotional and physical hunger during a fast? How does this relate to overeating and any associated health problems? The more I can fully function after addressing each need, the less hungry I notice myself feeling. Will eating properly help me recognize when my hunger reports something I must replenish? Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next
- Turner | AnankelogyFoundation
The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Steph Turner MI Steph Turner Estimated innocence score: 89 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated asexual trans person sentenced to lifetime sex offender registration Highlights of this wrongful conviction - no criminal history - always maintained innocence - transphobic & homophobic prosecution - no corroborating evidence - climate of sex abuse hysteria - no crime occurred - sensationalized coverage in local media - despite several degrees, no one will hire Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? not a factor not a factor central factor not a factor not a factor minor factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 11 EIF version: D Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in MI of: Aiding & abetting sexual misconduct 1st degree, 2nd degree Wrongly convicted on December 13, 1993 Sentence: 30 years prison; lifetime sex offender registry Custody status: sex offender registry Dive deeper into Steph's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Steph's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Steph's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Steph's compelling innocence Prior to accepting herself as transgender, Janet (principal & codefendant) often ran afoul of the law. She appears to have suffered Asperger’s (high functioning autism), so was slow at responding to social cues. Overcoming shame of being gender different helped her escape cycles of self-defeating behaviors. She overcame dyslexia and other challenges to lead a healthy life, until this happened. Nobody's perfect Synopsis Asexual person comes out as transgender in early 90s, gets falsely accused as being a “sexual predator” homophobic stereotype. Convicted without evidence. Must register as sex offender for life. Forced into poverty and homelessness. On July 7th, 1993, Steph Turner awoke to hear voices from the other room. Steph could hear her sister Janet talking to someone. That person left, but later returned with her irate mother to accuse Janet of an incredulous crime. You see, Janet was born male and now openly transgender, long before that was socially acceptable. And Janet had yet to fully transition. At the height of the sex abuse hysteria in the early-90s, Steph came out as gender-nonconforming transgender. But living in a religiously conservative community, Steph kept it private. Steph soon came out to Janet, years after Janet had. They shared an apartment to rekindle their newfound bond. Both now freely embracing their feminine sides. Both describe themselves as asexual, as unable to feel erotic attraction unless being fully loved for their full selves. Both felt more drawn to their indigenous spirituality, of transcending the gender divide for deeper connection. A neighborhood child drew curious, peeping into Janet’s window to gawk at what she called the "man with lipstick." She later came out as gay, but understandably could not risk rejection at home because of her young age. When caught not being home on time, the child leveled bizarre claims of sex abuse unbecoming from a child. Perhaps she was exposed to porn. The child then dragged Steph into her transphobic-indoctrinated accusations. The child claimed that Janet and Steph had her pose in a photo, with her stabbing Steph in the chest with a jelly-stained butter knife. She claimed this was to scare her from talking to police, that Janet and Steph would use the Polaroid photo to claim this young girl was the aggressor. Of course, no such photo ever existed. Unbelievable? Not if you already believe trans people are subhuman. Child testimonies back then were often coached. Trans people were easily vilified. Since no corroborating evidence was necessary back then to convict for sexual misconduct, both transwomen were wrongly convicted. And both sentenced to long terms in men’s prisons. Janet did not survive. In 2001, she succumbed to cancer. Repeated efforts to overcome their wrongful convictions have failed. After serving a full 12-year sentence, Steph was discharged and finished undergraduate and graduate degrees. But now Steph must register as a sex offender for life, despite being asexual. This continues to destroy Steph's economic and other opportunities. Your support can help turn this around. Summary Accuser's needs The young complainant later came out as gay. She couldn't risk her parents' rejection. She appeared curious to Janet's courage to be openly gender nonconforming. When confronted by her mother why she was in the apartment with that "man with lipstick", she understandably fabricated a story that she was not there on her own volition but dragged there and assualted. Her parent's homophic slurs agains us reinforced this young girl's defensiveness to hide from the truth. The Grand Rapids community must be kept safe from sexual violence and the threat of sexual violence. The GRPD must respond to calls about alleged sexual violence. The local DA and prosecutors must ensure the community is kept safe from actual sexual predators. The local press needs to provide newsworthy content to its local audience, which may include sensationalizing distortions that the average viewer needs to filter out on their own. The local transgender community needed to make sense of what happened. Steph's employer had to find someone to replace the shipping & receiving role Steph had performed. Steph's family needed to find an alternate source of income. Steph's three daughters and newborn son had to adjust to a life without their father. Alisha had to find how to become a single mother during this painful adjustment. Other's needs See Steph's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Appellate counsel filed a 60-page brief with 11 issues. Appellate panel threw out one conviction while wrongly affirming the other. The more serious charge of aiding and abetting CSC1 was reversed, but then replaced with a lesser CSC2 charge. In order to arrive to this conclusion, contrary to its norm, the appellate panel asserted the role as "trier of fact" when declaring the jury could have found Steph guilty of CSC2. Remanded back to trial court for resentencing. Reduced the sentence but failed to address the whole wrongful conviction. Steph applied for legal help from innocence projects five different times. Each time, Steph was declined for technical reasons from these under-resourced agencies. Early in Steph's sentence: To prioritize serving death row. Half way in their sentence: To priortize serving those with life sentences. Just before finishing their sentence: To prioritize serving those with long prison sentences. And after Steph was finally discharged, To serve those still incarcerated. A decade after discharge from prison but still wrongly on lifetime sex offender registry: Could not see how testing the untested DNA could lead to a reversal in court. Trying once more with the Michigan Innocence Clinic that does not rely on DNA evidence. This time, in conjunction with the Public Exoneration alternative to adversarial and alienating legalism. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Steph Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 2 Clearly innocent 5 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Steph Turner Follow my Public Exoneration campaign. Free. Consider becoming an active supporter for as little as $4.99 per week. Invest in restoring Steph’s freedom. Invest in yourself. Proxy for innocence claimant: Alisha Turner Public Exoneration progress: 10 How you can help us free Steph The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating them. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Steph The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating them. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Steph If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >
- Wilson | AnankelogyFoundation
The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Brenda Wilson IL Brenda Wilson Estimated innocence score: 86 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated verbal contract for startup loan spun as embezzlement Highlights of this wrongful conviction - false testimony by accuser - accuser withheld exculpatory documents - refused plea deal - accuser falsified banking transactions Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 23 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in IL of: embezzelment Wrongly convicted on June 2, 1995 Sentence: 7 years Custody status: probation Dive deeper into Brenda's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Brenda's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Brenda's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Brenda's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Brenda Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 0 Clearly innocent 0 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Brenda Wilson I am considering a Public Exoneration campaign. Perhaps my proxy and I will follow another campaign and see how it works out for them. Proxy for innocence claimant: Will Tanner Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Brenda The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating her. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Brenda The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating her. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Brenda If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >
- Contact | AnankelogyFoundation
Contact us We're barely getting off the ground over here. Please keep that in mind when contacting us. You may not get as prompt a reply as you deserve. Thank you for your understanding. Let's Enga ge Mailing address Anankelogy Foundation 126 E Kilgore Road Ste 400, #469 Portage, MI 49002 Social Media 517-462-9350 Leave voicemail or text. First Name Last Name Email Message Send Thanks for your interest. Find us now in your inbox. Let's respond to our needs together.
- Lee | AnankelogyFoundation
The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Samuel Lee CA Samuel Lee Estimated innocence score: 71 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated victim recants misidentification and alibis were never investigated Highlights of this wrongful conviction - alibi witness threatened to change story - victim regrets photo misidentification - identical crime occurred when held in jail - original investigator now supports retrial Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 19 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in CA of: selling drugs Wrongly convicted on July 18, 2014 Sentence: 5–15 years Custody status: parole Dive deeper into Marcus's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Marcus's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Marcus's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Marcus's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Samuel Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 0 Clearly innocent 0 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Samuel Lee Follow my Public Exoneration campaign. Consider becoming an active supporter for as little as $4.99 per week. Invest in restoring claimant’s freedom. Invest in yourself. Proxy for innocence claimant: Kelly Lee Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Samuel The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Samuel The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Samuel If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >
- Intake | AnankelogyFoundation
Filling out this intake form provides us essential information to tailor the wellness campaign to fit your specific needs and situation. Intake To properly serve you and enable you to resolve your needs for the wellness campaign , we need to ask you for some helpful information. Let's learn a little bit more about you Basic information First Name Email Last Name Birthday Select an Address Code Phone Wellness routine How often do you exercise Daily A few times a week About once a week Rarely How often you get a full night's rest? Every day Most days Rarely How often you use recreational drugs? Every day Most days Rarely Never How would you describe your eating pattern? Eat only healthy foods on a regular basis Eat healthy foods when I can Rarely eat healthily How often do you drink alcohol? Every day Most days Rarely Never How often do you use tobacco? Every day Most days Rarely Never Personal wellness challenges How anixous would you descibe yourself Every day Most days Rarely Never Question? Yes No Unsure Choose an option Choose an option Interpersonal wellness challenges How anixous would you descibe yourself Every day Most days Rarely Never Question? Yes No Unsure Choose an option Choose an option Power wellness challenges How anixous would you descibe yourself Every day Most days Rarely Never Question? Yes No Unsure Choose an option Choose an option Structural wellness challenges How anixous would you descibe yourself Every day Most days Rarely Never Question? Yes No Unsure Choose an option Choose an option Aspirations in life Check each health challenge you currently face: * Required chronic anxiety chronic depression daily substance use addiction(s) Choose an option Choose an option Rate Us Poor Fair Good Very good Excellent Enter a number State your primary wellness need in terms of "speaking truth to power" I have read, understood and now accept the service terms and conditions Submit info and proceed
- I-need messenger | AnankelogyFoundation
Need-response offers this free service to directly communicate your needs to others. "I-need" messages What do you need? Because your every natural need exists as an objective fact. You have needs others affect. Others have needs you affect. You can't expect rules to address your every need, nor theirs. You can expect to get more out of directly expressing needs. Welcome to a new service that incentivizes you to honor their needs. And incentivizes them to honor your needs, using "I-need" messages. What do you specifically need from others? Why do you need "I-need" messages? Why? Overview Resolve needs Remove pain Restore wellness Progress naturally from communicating your specific needs to those you personally know, and who personally know you, to conveying your affected needs to officials who impact them . Overview (Every natural need exists as an objective fact ) See how addressing the objective fact of each other's needs with "I-need" messages helps each other to resolve such needs, remove pain, and restore wellness. 1) To resolve needs (instead of easing pain or mindlessly follow rules ) See how "I-need" messages take you from reacting to your painful feelings and relying on norms to responding mutually to each other's needs for the greater good of all. 2) To remove or reduce pain (by addressing the needs causing you pain ) See how using "I-need" messages can remove cause for pain, as your body no longer must warn you of threats to your wellbeing. 3) To restore wellness (and reach more of your life's full potential ) See how aptly applied "I-need" messages liberates your potential by enabling you to function more fully. Click the tabs above to learn more. Then explore the 4 different "I-need" message types below. Overview (Every natural need exists as an objective fact) Resolve needs (and not merely ease pain or mindlessly follow rules) Remove or reduce pain ( by addressing the needs causing you pain) Restore wellness ( and reach more of your life's full potential) 4 types A. Personal B. Social C. Professional D. Official Progress naturally from communicating your specific needs to those you personally know, and who personally know you, to conveying your affected needs to officials who impact them . A. I need from a personal friend ... To directly communicate a need to someone you personally know, and who personally knows you. B. I need from a social peer... To directly communicate a need to someone you don't personally know, like a coworker or colleague. C. I need from a professional... To directly communicate a need to those you depend upon for some professional service, who hold a level of power over you. D. I need from an official... To directly communicate a need to a government or institutional official, who is the only means to address your vulnerable need. Learn more by clicking the tabs above for each one. And follow the tips in the video. Communicate your affected needs to close friends and family Communicate your affected needs to coworkers, colleagues and the like. Communicate your affected needs to professionals who powerfully impact you Communicate your affected needs to government officials 4 types "I-need" messenger service A. I personally need... Private · 2 members Request To Join B. I socially need... Public · 2 members Join C. I professionally need... Public · 2 Participants Join D. I officially need... Public · 2 members Join My neighbors used to drive me crazy. All I had to do is ask them politely, using one of these "I-need" messages. We now get along almost like buddies. Robb Walters
- NR Community | AnankelogyFoundation
Join the Need-Response Community to help develop this pioneering service of need-response. Become a member to help shape this service to address your particular needs. Help us all spread more love. Need-Responder Community Need-Responder Community members 1 Community Activity Need direction cycle Every need exists as an objective fact. Which you subjectively experience only after the fact. Only then do your feelings suggest what you could do to restore your objective functioning. What you then do in response is separate from the objective need itself. NR podcast Steph Turner Nov 10, 2025 5 min read mutuality process The 'mutuality process' serves as an answer to the problem of legalistic adversarialism, by affirming the needs of all involved in a conflict. Engage Steph Turner Nov 1, 2025 4 min read Question your beliefs about "justice" You risk being complicit in their violated innocence if you believe and act upon widely held but false views about the accused and wrongly convicted. Do you believe any of these 12 widely accepted views? Unexonerated Steph Turner Sep 11, 2025 17 min read Groups Need-Responder Community Paying members · 4 Need-Responders Join Anankelogy Principles Public · 3 members Join Personal Need-Responders Private · 3 Need-responders Request To Join Anankelogy Private · 2 students Request To Join C. I professionally need... Public · 2 Participants Join D. I officially need... Public · 2 members Join Show More Stretch Your Comfort Zone (to improve your wellness) 2 Participants 4 Plans Available View Details Need-responder entry $5.00 or 6 Plans Available View Details Our groups you can join Become a member and join one of our engaging groups. Feed Anankelogy Principles Public · 3 members Join Steph Turner August 7, 2023 NR101 QNR In response to NR101 step 5.2: 1) My easement orientation: I would say I am more resolve-over-relieve oriented. But admit it may not seem so from other's perspective. 2) My relational orientation : I would say I am more specific-over-general oriented. I've always described myself as detail-oriented. But others may see me in a different light. 3) My conflict orientation : I would say you I am more open-over-closed oriented. Even to the point it may seem I am unwilling to fight where other's believe that fighting is the best option. I do think I'm often misperceived or my intent misinterpreted that way. I'm conscious of how identifying all three more favorably could draw some criticism. I invite others to kindly and graciously illuminate any of my blind spots. Maybe some view me as more relieving, as generalizing, or as closed in conflict. Characterizing my need-experience orientations as all positive cannot be… See More 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Steph Turner July 6, 2023 · updated the description of the group. NR101 QNR Follow this public group engaging our listed anankelogy principles . This also serves as space for those in our development programs engaging others with their chosen anankelogy principle. Let's apply these principles to our lives and talk about it here. 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Steph Turner July 6, 2023 · added a group cover image. NR101 QNR 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Gustavo Nascimento July 2, 2023 Should we trust politicians with the task of resolving our needs? Yes No Yes, depending on the need 0 2 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Sort by: Newest Steph Turner Jul 03, 2023 • If asked "with the help of Need-response" then maybe I could vote Yes. Now to find a way to bring Harmony Politics or Unifying Politics over to this site. Unifying Politics Like Show more replies Gustavo Nascimento July 2, 2023 Anankelogy is social science created to understand human needs. 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Show more archive
- 1x05 | AnankelogyFoundation
< Back The Need-Response podcast 1x05 How well is your wellbeing? We define wellness as your ability to fully function. Not by relieving pain but removing cause for pain. The video will appear here in a moment Video version of the full audio podcast Show notes We define wellness as your ability to fully function. Not by relieving pain but removing cause for pain. The Need-Response podcast Anankelogy Foundation 00:00 / 42:38 Episode transcript PDF transcript for this episode Click on the button to view the full script of this episode Featured video clips These are the video clips featured in this episode. Click on the title to view it on YouTube. You also The video will appear here in a moment The video will appear here in a moment First video feature for this episode Second video feature for this episode Audiogram shorts View the snippets of this episode we posted online. Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Clip 4 Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 5 Clip 6 Clip 7 Clip 8 Summary update Check here for a brief update on the progress of the need-response service. 1x05 00:00 / 00:38 Engagement How well is your wellbeing? Public Engagement Interact with the content of this episode by leaving a comment at our YouTube channel. Engage 1st video feature Engage 1st video feature Engage full episode We are cultivating a love-inspired culture of how best to engage each other. If we reply to your comment, or read a comment we leave for someone else, observe our uniquely responsive approach. Member Engagement You can learn more about how we cultivate more of our potential to be more loving toward one another by engaging us, and each other, by becoming a member of the Need-Responder Community . You can start for free, as a Follower . Follow the development of the need-response serve. Give your input Become a Supporter to help shape this new service. Engage us personally. Become an invested Contributor to help co-create this new service. Become one of its first professionals. Explore your membership options More Engagement NRC Follower $0 $ 0 Follow developments of creating this service Valid until canceled Select Receive updates on this service’s progress We engage your feedback on its development Follow its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Follower? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum text We invite you, financially invested subscribers, to give us your feedback to this episode. And to discuss its content amongst yourselves. If you are a Follower, you can upgrade your subscription to join the discussion here . Already a Supporter? text Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum More Engagement NRC Supporter $5 $ 5 Every month Invest and co-create the need-response service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Support its development Choose one that works for you best More Engagement NRC Contributor $25 $ 25 Every month Take the lead in developing this much needed service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Test the need-response service Shape the need-response service Contribute to its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Contributor? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! text Discuss at Need-Response creation forum Next time In the next episode, we take you further into the journey of creating this pioneering service for you, with your helpful input. Previous episode Next episode
If not, then try another search phrase. It must be in here somewhere!
.png)








