< Back Sara Wallis Efforts to serve underserved populations have led to reformed practices and the correction of wrongful convictions. Sara Wallis was exonerated following years of wrongful imprisonment based on faulty eyewitness testimony. text Brief Announcement Publicly Exonerating Sara Wallis text text text Hardcopy PDF Executive Summary Public Exoneration of Sara Wallis text 1 Hardcopy PDF Comprehensive Engagement Sara Wallis Public Exoneration of text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text Hardcopy PDF Interactions Give us your feedback We’d love to know what you think about this innocence claim. First name* Last name Email* How convinced of their innocence? What do see as this case's strong points? What do see as this case's weak points? What do you see missing that we should address? Send Feedback "Testimonials are a great way to showcase positive feedback you've received. Click to edit and add yours." Simone Woods "Testimonials are a great way to showcase positive feedback you've received. Click to edit and add yours." Nicole Yang "Testimonials are a great way to showcase positive feedback you've received. Click to edit and add yours." Calvin Smith "Testimonials are a great way to showcase positive feedback you've received. Click to edit and add yours." Suzanne Levis Previous Next

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 1 Atomization culture Privileged objectification of individualism to the neglect of externalities. properly resolving needs Atomization culture 8/3/26 1 Atomization culture Flock cameras spot you and its AI network identifies you as individually violating some law. You receive a citation in the mail. Intuitively you wonder why this surveillance system doesn’t acknowledge any of your good public deeds it must have caught on their cameras. On another level, you intuitively realize this system ignores any socioenvironmental context hindering your ability to make optimal choices. Sure, everyone is responsible for their personal choices but not responsible for externalities limiting their options. Instead of affirming you or appreciating the externalities, it atomizes you into an objectified individual to be adjudicated in our adversarial legal process. The adversarial judicial process then “legitimizes” or excuses this damaging isolation of less advantaged individuals. Atomization culture covers that set of norms privileging any overemphasis of the individual to the neglect of socioenvironmental contexts. And tends to focus more on negative individual aspects than positive ones. Defunction: psychosocial imbalance norms Hyper-individualism emerges when emphasizing individual prowess to the neglect of social supports. The opposite extreme is overemphasizing social supports to the neglect of individual capacities. Western culture tends to spur more of the former. Optimal wellness (i.e., peakfunction ) depends on balancing the personal and social realm. Self-needs (like autonomy and self-initiative) resolve on par with social needs (like group cohesion and community supports). When self-needs resolve more than social needs, or when social needs resolve more than self-needs, psychosocial imbalance creeps in. This tension informs one’s political views. Progressives’ self-needs (like self-expression and self-acceptance) generally resolve more than their social needs (like societal acceptance and cultural inclusion). Conservatives’ social needs (like family cohesion and economic optimization) generally resolve more than their self-needs (like personal self-protection and self-initiative). Each tends to guard their resolved needs while generalizing how others ought to regard their unresolved needs. Atomization culture risks reifying or reinforcing this imbalance. Examples: Atomized protesters – activists cut off from each other in ways that authorities they critique can dilute their effectiveness for inspiring meaningful and lasting structural change. Atomized voter - as driven by personal rational choices divorced from social aspects. Biopsychological pathology – the idea that pathologies exist primarily or exclusively within the individual and not in the external social realm; contrast with the idea of a “sick society ” Decontextualized entrepreneurship – idealized as individuated effort overlooking cooperative aspects. Egotistic power – influencing others primarily or exclusively for selfish gain. Existential crisis – losing a sense of meaning or purpose in life from extended isolation from deeper social connections (potential source of some forms of depression). Family estrangement – limiting personal contact with loved ones. Ghosting – abruptly discontinuing communication with a once meaningful relation. Individuated illness – characterized as individual malady rather than an understandable consequence of living in a sick society. Intellectual supremacy – valuing who apparently is individually the smartest in the room rather than who is the most emotionally mature or unselfish or loving. Loneliness epidemic – normalizing personal isolation from each other. Myopic criminal investigation – generally excludes or downplays socioenvironmental factors. Myopic mental illness diagnosis – typically excludes or downplays socioenvironmental factors. Objectifying adjudication – victims and offenders of crimes treated exclusively as self-interested actors apart from the social dynamics hindering their chances to resolve interpersonal conflicts; the adversarial process imposes this self-interest assumption in ways that neglect human potential to work meaningfully through a conflict that can satisfactorily resolve each other’s affected needs (such as restorative justice). Over-responsibility – holding individuals accountable for factors beyond their personal control. Permitted narcissism – public actions privileged to serve the self at the expense of others. Politically privileged self-righteousness – rationalizing evasion of critique of one’s impactful ideological views as their right of conscious; maintaining blind spot for how they affect vulnerable others. Privileged offender – illicitly harming another in a way not explicitly illegal and tends to be regarded as a personal right that is divorced from personal responsibility. Reified civil inattention – politely respecting other’s public and potentially offensive behavior to the point of not offering them helpful feedback. Reified privacy – isolating oneself to the neglect of emotional intimacy needs. Reified self-interest – personal motives privileged to devolve into selfishness, alienating the self from others. Self-absorbed ecology – disregarding one’s damaging impact on the environment. Self-centered economics – amassing resources with little to no empathy for how it impacts others (excessive resourcing ). Social media anonymity – presenting idealized self, staying estranged from meaningful interpersonal connections. Uncontextualized trauma – emphasizing personal damage while neglecting structural damage at its roots. There could be many more examples of such hyper-individual alienation and atomization defunctions. Refunction: psychosocial balance path Need-response aims to shift our common incentives toward isolation to more interpersonal engagement and meaningful connection. Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting

9 < Back to list A. Character refunction 9 A mercy Mercy is here defined as letting go any right you have to force a negative consequence upon another deemed to cost you some negative consequence. Where forgiveness lets go of your anger toward another, mercy lets go of your right to punish the other. 9 .1 A Need experience When subjected to a perceived or real offense, you typically reject it as no fault of your own. Or if you can see some justification for it, you still angrily reject the offense as unfair. You see it your right to exact some kind of vengeance. By letting go of any justification for revenge, you save space to repair the damage. You still feel angry, but hesitate to act on your carte blanch rejection. You may not be ready to endure the discomfort of the wrong. Despite your intensely emotional rejection, you hold off from exacting any reprisals. Although not ready to forgive, you make room to address underlying needs. Or you were never intensely angry, but simply see the need to hold of any socially sanctioned retribution. Or scale down the degree of retribution. You put into motion an opportunity for the offender’s self-reflection and humility . You short-circuit violence . You prioritize resolving the needs involved. 9 .2 A Defunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction relationally lowers your ability to fully function. It is typically framed with more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 9 .3 A Refunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction could be turned around to raise your ability to function. It also uses more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 9 .4 A Example(s) This subsection offers some examples of this defunction you may observe affecting your life. Usually more than one example is provided. If reading this, there are no examples yet to this defunction. 9 .5 A Associated defunctions This subsection points to similar or applicable defunctions. If reading this, there are no defunctions specifically associated with this defunction. 9 .6 A Relevant refunctions This subsection points to relevant or complementary refunctions. If reading this, there are no relevant defunctions to correlate with this defunction. 9 .7 A Applicable principles This subsection points to those anankelogical principles that aptly apply to this defunction. If reading this, there are no anankelogical principles related specifically to this defunction. 9 .8 A Referenced blog posts This subsection points to those blog entries that relate to, or cite, this particular defunction. If reading this, there are no blog entries yet related specifically to this defunction. Date created: 8/29/23 Type: Date revised: A. Character refunction The more you let go of your rightful reaction to being wronged, the more your needs resolve. Be ready to let go not only of your anger, but let go also of your right to exact vengeance for a suffered wrong. Give more room to restore a damaged relationship by offering to forgo just compensation. Inspire their gratitude toward you with your readiness, willingness, and ability to clear their debts toward you. Engender mercy from others with your humility and remorse. Let your mercy demonstrate your love for others. See mercy resolve more needs. Previous Next Discuss at our Engagement forum

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 31 Structural exaction Coerced by powerful social structures to sacrifice value. properly resolving needs Structural exaction 8/8/26 1 Structural exaction Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting

If you or someone you support is a wrongly convicted innocent, and underserved by the adversarial legal process, need-response offes you three options. The first one is free: Estimated Innocence. Exoneration Services If you or someone you support is a wrongly convicted innocent, and underserved by the adversarial legal process, need-response offers you three alternative options. If you or someone you support is a wrongly convicted innocent, how can these services better serve you? Let us know in the comments below Welcome to Exoneration Services The video appears here in a moment. If not, refresh the page. Appellate Process Innocence Project Exoneration Services 1) Estimated Innocence 2) Innocence Profiles 3) Public Exoneration Innocence projects take cases slipping through the cracks of the appellate process. But who takes cases slipping through the cracks in the legalistic Innocence Movement? Exoneration Services does. Instead of serving laws, we prioritize serving your need for justice. First, by demonstrating the viability of your innocence claim using our downloadable Estimated Innocence Form. 1) Estimated Innocence . This form automatically compares your claim with those already exonerated. Then calculates the degree that your claim merits attention by those who take justice seriously. 2) Innocence Profiles . Upload the results of your calculate innocence to our Unexonerated page. Let the public recognize the viability of your innocence claim. Attract widespread support. 3) Public Exoneration . Invite your family and friends to support your innocence publicly. Engage innocence lawyers and judicial authorities beyond the confines of adversarial law. Incentivize them to exonerate yo u. Estimated Innocence DIY for free Download the free spreadsheet form. Fill it out and get an instant calculation of viable innocence. Use as you see fit. Estimated Innocence Innocence Profiles Free, donate if you can to offset costs Upload your completed Estimated Innocence Form. Let the whole world recognize your compelling claim of actual innocence. Attract public support. Innocence Profiles Public Exonerati on $199.99/month, crowdfunded, 30-day trial While waiting for innocence litigators to do their thing, start our public exoneration alternative. See if we can respond faster and more effectively than mere law. Public Exoneration Serving the underserved innocent Welcome to this brand-new approach to seeking exoneration from a wrongful conviction. This service is specifically for those demonstrating actual innocence , who had no role in the alleged crime. And for those underserved by the legal process. Academic research points to over a hundred thousand wrongly convicted innocent persons in prison and beyond. While grat eful for the Innocence Project, these teams of lawyers barely scrat ch the surface of these costly miscarriages of justice. While the Innocence Movement has helped to exonerate around 4,000 innocent people, far more remain falsely imprisoned. Most innocence projects lack the resources to effectively process all viable innocence claims. AI could improve this . Meanwhile, their output remains constrained by an adversarial legal system. Exoneration Services is a specialized service of need-response. Need-response is a new professional field to directly serve your needs beyond the confines of adversarial legalism. Including your need for exoneration from a guilty adversarialist system. You are witnessing something totally new. And you can help shape it into something serving your particular needs. Give your input You can help shape these visionary services to fit your particular needs. We meet up each month in our Unexonerated Innocent group on Telegram . New to Telegram? Learn more here , here , and here . We tentatively meet up the first Saturday of the month, at 10:00 am ET. We may change this as we learn when is the optimal day and time for all. Use the form below to express your interest. You will receive an invitation link to the meetup. At the scheduled time of the meeting, and assuming you have the Telegram app, just click on the provided link. Come prepared with your questions and suggestions. Let us help each other improve our chances for exonerating the innocent. telegram signup Join us on Telegram Join our private "Unexonerated Innocent" group on Telegram . When you register, you will receive the invite link in your inbox. First name* Last name* Email* Select each that describes you I am an innocence claimant I represent an innocence claimant I serve an innocence agency Your best available day to meet online each month REGISTER to JOIN Keep Hope Alive I am trying to build what I myself need. I am a survivor of a wrongful conviction, yet trapped in poverty because of collateral consequences of a wrongful conviction . To sustain this vision, I need your help. The more you can donate here, the greater the chance this can succeed for the many who desperately need this. Thank you, and they thank you. Or donate directly on FreeFunder A donation option appears here after a few seconds If not, then simply refresh the page Follow developments Can't join us on Telegram? Then follow developments on our Need-Response podcast . Episodes air every other Wednesday. Co hosted by Steph Turner and Gustavo Nascimento, season two focuses on serving the unexonerated innocent. Your input shared in our Telegram meet ups could wind up on the show. Let's talk . Let's make waves. Ultimately, let's free the innocent! You can follow the show on different podcast platforms. Spotify Amazon Castbox iHeart PlayerFM YouTube NR Clips RSS feed See you there. How can these better serve you?

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 19 Moral conflation Regarding inflexible needs as the same as flexible responses. properly resolving needs Moral conflation 8/8/26 1 Moral conflation Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting

< Back Exoneration Initiative not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 3 Hyperbole culture Privileged generalizing overlooking relevant nuance. properly resolving needs Hyperbole culture 8/3/26 1 Hyperbole culture President Trump claimed he could end the Ukraine war in a day. Did anyone take him literally or didn’t we all recognize his boast as generalizing? Democrats during Trump’s first term claimed Trump colluded with Russians to get elected . Who didn’t see this as a generalization to parse the shattering of the Overton window ? Independent media criticized legacy media for fanning the flames of “Russiagate ”. Each side carved out competing generalizations that ignores the specifics of the Overton window crash. Politicians rely on generalizing and now privileged to generalize into absurdities. Both legacy and independent media now collude to undermine credibility in politics itself as a viable answer. Hyperbole culture covers those social norms privileging generalizing that easily overlooks relevant specifics. Which often extends to the point of overgeneralizing and accepting exaggerations as fact. Defunction: overgeneralizing norms Publicized ideas get condensed for easy, rapid and widespread consumption. Our minds lack the cognitive bandwidth to properly process in real time all the relevant details in a pressing matter. So we accept rhetorical shortcuts that must skip over some vital specifics. We don’t always get back to those skipped details. We gloss over reality and pay the price. Especially when provoked defensiveness motivates us to cling to biases. Meanwhile, reality explodes in our faces as our generalizations catch us looking the other way. Anankelogy recognizes an array of generalizing that correlate with its four levels of functionality. Dynamic generalizing . You reduce something to cognitively process it in the moment but always ready to get back to specifics temporarily set aside. Peakfunctional : Readiness to switch back to engaging relevant specifics allows needs to resolve promptly. Popular generalizing . Popgen for short, you accept widely accepted generalized versions of concepts, often too complex to be readily understood. Symfunctional : Which is enough to adequately function in social spaces, at a level of socially tolerated mediocrity. Relief generalizing . Relief-gen for short, you gravitate toward generalizations that offer relief from discomfort, even if divorced from what is true. Dysfunctional : Which easily compromises wellness and leaves you exposed to more emotional pain. Broad absurdities . You cling to baseless generalities that draw you deeper into trouble. We could also call this “believed stupidity” or BS for short. Misfunctional : Which exposes you to existential disillusionment as reality slams in with full shock. Legalism counts on generalizing. Politics exists on generalizing. Courts generalize people as defendants, accusers, witnesses, plaintiffs, appellants, felons and so forth. These serve the institution’s processing pipelines more than accountably deliver on justice needs, which can result in mass institution mission creep (see below). Consider some examples. Examples: Examples of political generalizing - partisan generalizing for coalition support leftists are bad people, who want to replace freedom with a communist state right wingers are all racist xenophobes Democrats are coming after our guns Republicans think capitalism will fix anything Examples of judicial generalizing - categories for adjudication convenience guilt or acquittal and nothing in between victim or offender binary overlooking nuance where victim had victimized another around the same time and offender was fending of some form of violence crime categories that overlook nuance of many situations and the full context of volatile situations harboring less visible forms of violence criminal justice process with discrete steps from decisionmakers, each sidestepping the nuance of both accused and accuser, occasionally resulting in a miscarriage of justice Examples of generalizing by functional level Peakfunctional - dynamic generalizing Consider how each of these are viewed through the lens of those held accountable for its accuracy. critical liberalism critical existentialism & critical rational choice theory critical postmodernism critical microaggression critical race theory critical identity politics & critical intersectionality critical transgenderism critical libertarianism critical gun rights critical free market dynamics Symfunctional - popgen When packaged for wide appeal, each of these get watered down for easier consumption. Social norms tend to accept these as the same as the critical version above. Problems then creep in subtly, often without awareness. popgen liberalism popgen existentialism & popgen rational choice theory popgen postmodernism popgen microaggression popgen race theory popgen identity politics & popgen intersectionality popgen transgenderism popgen libertarianism popgen gun rights popgen free market dynamics Dysfunctional - relief-gen Those eager to relieve the pain from all of their unresolved needs gravitate toward a more simplified version of these concepts. With limited cognitive bandwidth, from coping with all that pain from unmet needs, such concepts often get oversimplified into cheapened versions. Those challenging such a concept favor such a diluted version to denounce the whole thing. relief-gen existentialism & relief-gen rational choice theory relief-gen postmodernism relief-gen microaggression relief-gen race theory relief-gen identity politics & relief-gen intersectionality relief-gen transgenderism relief-gen libertarianism relief-gen gun rights relief-gen free market dynamics Politicians and pundits who conflate these different level versions, typically for coalition support, leave themselves open to conflict. Which privileges norms for rushing into conflicts. For example, the voter clinging to relief-gen postmodernism views (e.g., all things are relative) is not the same as the voter discussing critical postmodernism (e.g., words exist within a context of cultural norms). React culture privileges the denunciation of postmodernism as a whole because somewhere someone diluted it with the generalization that all things (which is an absolute) is relative. There are other hyperbole culture examples, like reified reductionism (reducing something to make sense of it then forgetting the big picture), cognitive bandwidth contraction (exaggerating when simplifying for limited attention), and distant from one's expertise (disregarding details not within one’s purview of knowledge) but these represent some key examples fueling many of our problems. Refunction: relevant nuance path Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting

Power Problems Power problems occur when impactors impede impactees trying to properly resolve needs . power problems & power-impacted needs properly resolving needs Power problem ID: A05 Universal Cultural Incompetence Insensitive to valuable differences cultural incompetence cultural competency < previous next > Cultural Incompetence Neglecting the impactee’s culturally different values or perspectives, where the impactor potentially pressures the impactee to fit into their cookie cutter cultural norms. The impactee may rightly fear some form of retribution for not fitting into the impactor’s cultural expectation. Or feel their full value remains overlooked and their contributions routinely neglected. cultural competency The further along the cultural competence continuum , the more trustworthy the impactor to those vulnerable impactees who valuably exist and properly act outside of mainstream cultural norms. Whether a healthcare provider or a different impactor, the impactor's responsiveness to impactee cultural differences fall along a recognized continuum: Stage 1. Cultural Destructiveness Stage 2. Cultural Incapacity Stage 3. Cultural Blindness Stage 4. Cultural Precompetence Stage 5. Cultural Competence and Proficiency Need-response can guide the targeted impactor to improve their cultural competency by walking them through the need-response process with an impactee. The impactor learns to appreciate the impactee's hidden value and how to properly address anything that is not appropriate simply because it is culturally different. The impactee can then contribute more of their full value when free to be their authentic selves. And their differentness can invite the impactor to inquire if the impactee sees something that the impactor cannot through the lens of their own familiarity bias. The impactor then earns legitimacy to reliably impact impactees who are culturally different from oneself. And gain competitive legitimacy when tapping into impactees' unique perspectives. Cultural Incompetence Corrupting Influence Cognitive Contraction Coercive Compliance Coerced Poor Options Dependence

< Back Alaska Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back Indiana Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 18 Mass institution mission creep Privileged shift from founding purpose to self-interests. properly resolving needs Mass institution mission creep 8/8/26 1 Mass institution mission creep Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting