Search Results

Legitimacy of authority can be lost when imposing a hidden cost. < Back F05 Authority Principle List of all principles Legitimacy of authority can be lost when imposing a hidden cost. Image: Pixabay – FelixMittermeier (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more those in positions of authority rely in impersonal norms and less engaging social structures, the more they risk imposing some costs not immediately obvious to them. Those under thumb of such pressures tend not to vocalize their frustrations, to avoid risking retribution. The more an authority realizes it invisibly extracts such value, the better it can retain its legitimacy. Description Which do you think is more likely? It’s hopeless to convince the powerful to respond better to your needs. OR Affirming the needs of the powerful can incentivize them to affirm yours. Anankelogy If you are in a position of power, then you likely realize this truism: You don’t know what you don’t know . You likely also appreciate the challenge of seeking answers if you don’t even know what to effectively ask. You could invite feedback to your leadership’s effectiveness, but you likely only hear crickets. Those subject to your authority likely keep their distance. And they often hold you to unrealistic expectations, like hoping you can read their minds to know their day-to-day needs. You likely hold unrealistic expectations of them. You expect them to follow your orders without question. Or at least with minimal resistance, so you accomplish the demands of those in authority over you. You tend to bias the needs of those in higher authority over the needs of those reporting to your authority. But all natural needs sit equal before nature . Your subordinates cannot adequately function for you if too many of their vulnerable needs get ignored. As far as you know, you can be doing a top-notch job. But abruptly hell breaks loose. What went wrong? You’re doing everything right, as far as you know, and something still falls apart. Need-response can help you in ways no other professional resource can. We incentivize those you impact to speak truth to power to respectfully provide you useful impact data. This incentivizes you to listen to those impacted . Only need-response cultivates this win-win environment. Need-response Need-response can complement law enforcement. Or compete with unresponsive law enforcement. Likewise, it can either complement your authority or compete with it, based on the objective outcomes produced. Need-response asserts the higher authority of resolving needs. If those you impact optimally resolve more needs than you in measurable ways, we invite your support or challenge your legitimacy. Without the discipline of need-responsiveness, authorities everywhere rapidly lose sufficient legitimacy in the eyes of the impacted. The rule based international order appears to be collapsing. Elites relying on manipulation to corral compliance no longer works. The standards for impacting us continue to rise. Need-response seeks to support a new mindset of leadership. Instead of hating on elites or rebelling against authorities, need-response reaches out to unresponsive leaders to provide the anankelogical tools to be more measurable responsive. That may require some massive shifts in your understanding of once widely accepted norms. For example, the manipulation of representative democracy into something that no longer represents the interests or needs of the people. Your needs and our needs cannot be manipulated by feigned choices. Reactive Problem Reality is not a democracy. The objective fact of each other’s needs, and each other’s priority of needs, cannot be legitimately subjected to a ballot. Attempts to coerce others to change what their inflexible needs risks undermining the true intent of democracy. Save democracy for shaping policies to respond to needs. And not to attempts to contest the needs themselves. The more you reactively resist with authority, the more pushback you inevitably get. Violence is not the answer , even if ordered from above. A violent authority cannot legitimately call for nonviolence while benefiting from their violence against those they insist shall stay nonviolent. Cui bono? Quite the opposite, that incites a struggle for self-preservation that risks slipping into violence. When an authority incites such desperate reaction and then tries to crush it, anankelogy asserts that it loses its exclusive claim for the use of violence. You can find this principle baked into the U.S. Declaration of Independence . And grounded in passage of the 2nd Amendment . While you may mean well, and act with the best of intensions, your imposition of authority tends to extract value instead of creating value. The less those you impact can resolve their needs, the less capable they can function well enough to meet your expectations for social order. Institutions everywhere are losing sufficient legitimacy the more they alienate themselves from self-awareness. Whenever any authority benefits from holding back those under their thumb, revolution could be sparked right around the corner. Responsive Solution Let’s now get right to how this principle can solve that problem. . For now, this serves as placeholder text. When I find the time, I will post the full deal here. How does this speak to your experience of needs? Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Glossary M metapain (n. ) The body warning of the threat of too much pain in order to continue functioning. misfunction (n. ) Lowest level of a person's or entity's ability to function focused on surviving while their most basic needs continue unresolved. Sits below dysfunction in function array. moral conflation (n. ) - DEFUNCTION The defunction of failing to distinguish between unchosen needs and chosen responses . E.g., The rhetorical demand "I need a bottle of water" conflates the unchosen need for water with the chosen response to get that water in a bottle, which could be accessed in other ways. While expecting another to choose to get that water in some way fair to others, expecting another to not require water naturally provokes conflicts unnecessarily. Likewise, conflating another's unchosen need for security with their defensive chosen responses to feel more secure easily invites an avoidable conflict. See adversarialism , conflict porn and indulgent side-taking . Countered by the refunction of moral distinction that affirms unchosen needs before questioning chosen responses to such needs. moral distinction (n. ) - REFUNCTION The refunction of distinguishing between unchosen needs and chosen responses by first affirming inflexible unchosen needs before addressing flexible chosen responses to them. Answers the defunction of moral conflation . moral inversion (n. ) - DEFUNCTION - wellness resistance Reversing or displacing the good of resolving inflexible needs with the bad of not resolving such needs. And regarding the bad of not resolving inflexible needs as good. Anankelogy recognizes that every need exists as an objective fact , and every unmet need objectively diminishes one’s capacity to fully function, or to be fully well. This instills into morality an objective dimension , independent of personal beliefs or values. How we respond to needs can be relative to our beliefs and values. But the needs themselves emerge as objective facts separate from our personal agency. They objectively exist to serve our objective functioning. Which allows them to be measurable with the tools of social science. Efforts to only relieve the pain of an unmet need tends to ignore the objective fact of that need, which signals more pain to be relieved. For example, avoiding your anxiety by not facing a threat you feel that you cannot quite handle easily leaves you with more anxiety. Regarding such avoidance as good can hint at regarding a courageously bold act as foolish and therefore bad. Likewise, efforts to satiate cravings of a neglected need also overlooks the objective fact of that need, which typically results in more obsessive desires to be indulged. For example, indulging your desire for friendship by relying solely on social media “friends” can easily leave you feeling empty and craving for deeper connection. Regarding low-investment friendships as good may consider more meaningful friendships as too demanding and therefore bad. Both of these easily prompt a vicious cycle that risks pulling away from the “good” of resolving needs. Both tend to normalize the “bad” of lowered levels of functioning. These also risk sliding into the “bad” of normalizing the conditions of unmet needs. The "good" of resolving needs can appear too unfamiliar to risk trying. Some of this points to coerced dependence upon poor options (or CoPOD ). Or the results of symfunction capture that manipultes one to acquiesce to less-than-optimal choices. Increased pain occurs besides the best efforts to curb it. The good role of pain to alert one of threats to be removed become regarded as “bad” and avoided at all costs. Less healthy actions to ease such pain or satiate cravings with substitutes become regarded as “good”. The more one leans into easing their discomfort without resolving the underlying need, or settles for indulging their desires with unhelpful substitutes, the less they can function. Their diminished wellness can blind them from this reversing of priorities. Motivated reasoning supports their defensive self-righteousness. They may become unduly hostile to any critique of their moral reversal. The less their needs resolve, the more they tend to become self-absorbed in their consequential pain or obsessive desires. The more consumed by this mounting emotional discomfort, the less they can focus on other matters. They become less aware of their harmful impacts on others. They may dismiss any good faith empathy as depraved bothsidesism , to defensively protect their painful norms of alienation. Or regard mutually destructive adversarialism and avoidance as good if only to denounce efforts toward mutual understanding as morally weak. They tend to protect the familiarity of what helps them cope with their painful situation. Mounting pain of their unmet needs strains how much more discomfort they can readily handle. In short, they invert morality. What is good for resolving needs—like fully processing pain—becomes identified as bad . What is bad for resolving needs—like repeatedly ignoring the threats warned by pain or repeatedly indulging in substitutes that do little if anything to replenish what’s spent—becomes identified as good . This inversion can be isolated as observable phenomena with the social science tools of anankelogy. movement wellness campaign (n. ) [wellness campaign terminology] The third type of wellness campaign builds on the momentum of a successful project type of campaign, where at least one impactor demonstrates transformative leadership to inspire transforming social norms to solve structural problems . The other two types are case and project campaigns. mutual defensiveness (n. ) - DEFUNCTION The defunction of prioritizing discomfort avoidance and normative alienation over vulnerably engaging the affected needs during a conflict with others. mutual regard (n. ) - REFUNCTION The need-responsive refunction of attending to the needs on all sides of a conflict. In contrast to feel-reactive defunction s like indulgent side-taking , mutual defensiveness and conflict porn . A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

You don't exist for human authority; human authority exists for you. < Back F03 Authority Principle List of all principles You don't exist for human authority; human authority exists for you. Image: Pixabay – Pexels (click on meme to see source image) Summary The longer institutional authority exists, the more it tends to shift from primarily serving its founding purpose to increasingly serving itself at the expense of its founding purpose. When trying to coerce you to serve its ends at odds with your inflexible needs, you understandably acquiesce to avoid its wrath. But the more authority creates the conditions for its own necessity, the less legitimate it can be. Description Which do you think is more likely? You must submit to every authority positioned over you. OR Authority must respond to needs for us to legitimately submit to it. Anankelogy This echoes the documented words of Jesus : “The Sabbath rest was made for humanity, not humanity for the Sabbath rest.” Goes to show you that even in biblical times, authority tends to drift from its founding purpose to increasingly serve itself at other’s expense. Often at the expense of that founding purpose. This is known as mission creep . Every authority emerged from a situation in which someone had to take charge. For example, when confronted by an enemy tribe or reacting to a sudden flood. Someone or some group was trusted to coordinate the larger group away from harm. If this incipient authority proved trustworthy in this initial crisis, then it often remained in a position of social power to continue overseeing the needs of the larger group. An ad hoc committee can evolve into a professional force wielding considerable influence. Sociology observes how authority tends to shift from primarily serving its founding purpose to increasingly serving itself. In a general sense, this given power corrupts those in charge as their priorities swing from sacrificially serving the urgent needs of the larger group to professionally serving in a role with certain privileges. Over time, such authority posits itself as essential for the people’s wellbeing. Privileged authority tends to coerce individuals, now vulnerable to their influence, to unquestioningly accept their power. Authority may then invert the relationship, when demanding the served people now serve and submit to it. Need-response Authority operates from its recognized legitimacy, to be trusted to lead or influence others. The more a trusted authority undermines the needs of those they impact, the more they lose that trust. The less they are trusted, the less legitimate that authority. Need-response recognizes the possibility of a new authority emerging to replace another that has lost its legitimacy. That effectively occurred with the American Revolution, as the U.S. Constitution emerged in response to the failing legitimacy of the 18th century British authorities. As history appears to repeat itself, U.S. hegemony appears to privilege U.S. authority to act with fewer accountabilities for its impactful actions. Need-response counters with “responsive authority” that earns its legitimacy by measurably enabling society’s members to resolve their needs, remove their pain and restore their wellness. Reactive Problem Authority figures don’t know what they don’t know. Those under their care typically do not go out of their way to tell them. The influenced don’t know what the influencers don’t know, nor think to ask. The influenced naturally avoid the risk of any retribution. They will at least appear to honor the authority figure’s apparently reasonable demands. An inherent adversarial relation keeps them alienated from each other. Authority figures feel many of the same needs as those under their influence. They too need such qualities as empathy, kindness, grace, trust, and patience. But those of us under some authority rarely if ever think of the vulnerable needs of those in powerful positions. We generally assume they must take care of those needs on their own, or with higher authorities. We rarely if ever consider how they need us to be patient with them, or gracious to them as they make some harmless mistake, or gentle with them when they lose resources to adequately fulfill their role. They hurt as we hurt, yet we typically expect them to not feel and just perform their professional role without complaint. Responsive Solution Authority figures typically seek to serve the needs of the people under their care, but lack awarenessof their actual impact. They require impact data . They could design their own survey to gather such data. But they unlikely know what to properly ask to effectively serve your vulnerable needs . The less their questions speak to your needs, the less likely you will respond . Need-response bridges this chasm of normative alienation with mutual regard . It’s how need-response incentivize powerholders to respond to the relatively powerless like you. It equalizes power relations . You need to speak your truth to power, but you also need them to listen and effectively respond. They need your impact data to remain competitively competent, but they also need to answer to all their constituents. POWERLESS NEEDS – POWERHOLDER NEEDS SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER - LISTEN TO THOSE IMPACTED Each side needs each other. Need-response creates an environment for both sides to honor the other’s sides needs to everyone’s benefit. Powerholder’s engagement with those impacted melds with the impacted providing social proof of their effectiveness of leadership. Each side does their part to counter the disabling problem of avoidant adversarialism . Each side incentivizes the other to appreciate authority’s effectiveness stretches no further than each other’s affected wellness. Each side ensures authority faithfully serves our wellness instead of coercing our wellness to serve authority. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: Does this apply only to government or state authority, or to other “authorities” as well? How can need-response check the powerful from overreaching its authorities? What about overbearing authority of written laws? Honestly, it’s not easy to realize when authority coerces me into going against my actual needs. Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Take the easy course, then life gets hard. Take the hard course, then life gets easy. < Back D08 Pain Principle List of all principles Take the easy course, then life gets hard. Take the hard course, then life gets easy. Image: Pixabay - Sonyuser (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more you indulge yourself to avoid the discomforts of fully resolving your needs, the more your unresolved needs result in lingering pain. The more you face upfront the intense discomforts necessary to fully resolve your needs, the more you will enjoy some long-term fruits and suffer less lingering pain. Your life typically reveals a pattern of favoring one or the other. Description Which do you think is more likely? You pick the low hanging fruit of an easier path in life because of your moral failings. OR You would pursue the challenging path of resolving needs no matter how difficult at first, if this option was more open to you. Anankelogy Anankelogy introduces you to various need-experience orientations . These are relatively fixed ways you experience your familiar needs. This principle speaks to your “easement orientation ”. You’re either oriented to resolve your needs over relieving their pain. You take the hard course first. Or you’re oriented to relieve your pain over resolving the needs causing your pain. You take the easy path first. The less you can fully resolve your needs, the less you can function. Every unresolved need emotionally warns you of its threat to your ability to function. The less you can function over time, the more your pain builds up. The longer you must adjust to this mounting pain, the more you get used to coping with this manageable level of discomfort. If you cannot consistently access what would restore you to full functioning, but must settle on some alternative or substitute to get you by, you naturally become oriented to seek relief over resolving your pounding needs. In other words, it is not always simple to merely choose the challenging path upfront, to decide to endure the difficulties inherent when fully resolving your needs. Your life situation shapes your orientation to your needs. Options to live optimally may remain beyond your reach. Need-response exists to give you optimal choices. So you can accept, with little risk of falling flat, the difficult path upfront to fully resolve needs. Need-response Here is where we apply this principle to improve our need-responding skills. We contrast popular norms creating a feel-reactive problem with our preferable need-responsive solution . Reactive Problem Game theory and rational choice theory provide a helpful framework for understanding the specific choices we make in life. But this approach can offer only part of the picture. Need-response recognizes the role of needs as they actually occur, with empirical evidence. No matter how much you aspire to take the high road of nobly suffering to resolve needs, you likely find yourself having to settle for less. You needless feel guilty if you repeatedly take the law road of self-indulgence to cope somehow with your load of pain of unresolved needs. Responsive Solution Western culture biases us to primarily think of our individual choices. This lens can blind us from how our choices are limited by our social environments. Those able to access more resources to more fully resolve their needs often assume others enjoy about the same level of access. Need-response incentivizes those with greater access to resources to improve accessibility to others less fortunate. Instead of relying on political generalizations or impersonal policies to spread wealth, need-response personally connects the advantaged with the relatively less advantaged. Need-response offers the potential for all to take the challenging path to more fully resolve needs. And offers opportunity for the more advantaged to take the challenging path to support the full resolution of needs of others with a mutually beneficial conciliatory process. Because outrage is never as potent as the powerful incentive of love to mutually resolve each other’s affected needs. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: I’ve tried to take this nobler path of accepting difficulties upfront, but find myself repeatedly pulled back to ease my unrelenting pain. I’ve tried this approach of taking the hard road first, but I can’t say it helped me much. I once took the more challenging route of hitting a problem head on and it turned out great. I already orient my life to take the challenging road first, and let me tell you how it really is. Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Glossary Z no entries yet for Z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

Anankelogy Principles A-Foundational - B-Basic - C-General - D-Pain - E-Conflict - F-Power - G-Structural - H-Love You will find these principles organized into eight distinct types. Foundational Principles lay the basis for anankelogy as a unique science. These create the foundation for the discipline study of need . As objective phenomena, many aspects of our needs can be examined by the scientific method . Basic Principles ground aspects of your experience with needs in the science of anankelogy. These establish anankelogy as a unique social science . General Principles add wisdom to experiencing needs anchored in the science of anankelogy. These provide insight into what this new profession of need-response can do that other professional fields cannot . Pain Principles start applying anankelogy to be more "need-responsive" in our lives. These apply primarily at the personal human problem level. Conflict Principles offer some insight for negotiating disputes you have with others. These apply primarily at the interpersonal human problem level. Authority Principles apply anankelogy to the legitimacy of those in positions of influential power. These apply primarily at the power human problem level. Law Principles apply anankelogy to the point of having laws and unwritten norms. These apply primarily at the structural human problem level. Love Principles cap these need-focused concepts with mutual respect for each other's needs. These give context to all the other types as we function best when we support others to function their best. One word for such positive regard is love. Get these inspiring principles in your inbox once a week! First name* Email* Join I want to subscribe to your mailing list. * A01 Foundational Principle A natural need is an objective fact. The more you drill down to the beginning of an experienced need, the more you find what exists prior to any human intervention. You don’t merely believe you must have water or that you need a friend, you experience these needs as essential to your capacity to function. Your ability to function after quenching a thirst or leaning on a friend exist independent of subjective feelings, as objective facts. The less your natural needs resolve, the less you can objectively function. Read More A02 Foundational Principle A naturally prioritized need is an objective fact. The more something you require to fully function persists unsatisfied, the more your attention will be drawn toward its satisfaction. It matters less whether you believe you must prioritize it. The objective basis of your functioning subconsciously demands you focus on it over less pressing matters. Any subjective beliefs or feelings arrive after the objective fact of your life prioritizing it. The less you attend to your inflexibly prioritized needs, the less you can objectively function. Read More B01 Basic Principle Resolving needs improves wellness. Wellness is another word for function. All needs exist to serve function. The more you resolve your needs, the better you can function. The more you eat well, the better you can function. You eat, breathe, connect with friends and enjoy moments of solitude all for the sake of being able to function through life. The less your needs resolve, or the less you attend to your prioritized needs, the less you can function. Or the less well you will be. Where there is no function to serve, there is no need. Read More B02 Basic Principle Emotions personally convey needs. The less you can function because of some lack or some threat, the more your body will emote you do something to replenish that lack or remove that threat. Such responses are automatic. Your body conveys your needs to maintain function. You don’t even have to feel it, though you often do on some level. Where there is no need to convey, there is no emotion. Read More B03 Basic Principle Your emotions prioritize your existence. The more you sense some threat, even a mild risk to your safety, your emotions will automatically prioritize your continued existence. Without your assured continuance, little else matters to your life. Or you may no longer be around, or at least at your current capacity, for anything else to matter. Once triggered, it’s next to impossible to prioritize anything else. Read More B04 Basic Principle Your feelings alert you to the status of your needs. The more your functioning becomes limited from some unresolved need, the more your feelings call attention to it. Initially, such feelings remain vague. Then often out of the blue, they turn alarmingly urgent. Usually with something you could do right away to ease the pressure. You could react on this feeling. Or you could dig deeper into what your feelings can only suggest is really happening. Properly responding dissolves its intensity. Read More B05 Basic Principle Beliefs exist to serve needs. The more your interpreted perceptions help you to function in life, the more they crystallize into useful beliefs. The less relevant a fact is to your functioning, the less you cling to it. It matters little if you agree or disagree whether the sun will someday go nova. You can hardly be persuaded against holding as true what helps you survive today, or helps you get by, or helps you get ahead in life. Read More B06 Basic Principle You believe what you need to believe. The more a belief proves vital to your existence, the more it rises in your hierarchy of accepted truths. The more your life seems or actually depends on something being so, the more you must naturally defend it. The less relevant to your required means to function, the less you defend it. The less your needs resolve, the more tightly you cling to any belief you perceive helping you get by. Read More B07 Basic Principle Your biases prioritize your needs. The less resolve a need, the more your attention naturally turns to seek its relief. You find you must prioritize whatever you find available to ease the emotional pressure. Sometimes, you hit on exactly what your life requires. Your prioritized thinking leads you in a positive direction. Other times, you prioritize generalizations that offer hope for relief. Such biases easily lead you astray, and in pain. Read More B08 Basic Principle All beliefs include error. The more you generalize, the less likely the accuracy of those beliefs. If irrelevant to your life, then the result errors can pass unnoticed. As a factory worker, it matters little if I believe Abraham Lincoln was born in Illinois or Kentucky. If my livelihood depends on it, I better know he was born in Kentucky. There will always be facts beyond the reach of your conclusions. Humility helps you stay informed. Read More B09 Basic Principle All your behaviors serve your needs. The less some action contributes to your wellbeing, the more open you are to change them. The more an action enables you to function, the more likely to repeat that action. Even the most trivial of behaviors must align with what you need to function, or you will likely change it. If you keep giving cash to that homeless guy and then run out of cash, you inevitably change your behavior. Read More B10 Basic Principle Needs resolve and evolve. The more you satisfy a recurring need, like drinking water to quench a thirst, the more your repeated action predictably leaves you satisfied. The more you pacify your recurring needs with some alternative, like indulging in junk food for each meal, the less your hunger subsides. The more you habitually rely on alternatives, the more your life contracts to accommodate such limits. Read More View this list organized into these topics 1 2 3 4 5 1 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 6 A-Foundational B-Basic C-General D-Pain E-Conflict F-Authority G-Law H-Love

The Need-Response podc ast Spotify Amazon Castbox iHeart PlayerFM YouTube NR Clips RSS feed The Need-Response podcast introduces you to the budding professional service of ‘need-response ’. Steph and Gustavo address your underserved needs with this new service, beyond the limits of our current institutions of law and psychotherapy . Follow along to speak truth to power, incentivizing them with the power of love to listen to those they impact. Episodes drop each Wednesday morning, starting 30 April 2025. August 6, 2025 2x09 Prove your innocence without lawyers Instead of filling out and sending paper forms that take forever, consider this better alternative. 2x09 Prove your innocence without lawyers 00:00 / 26:10 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) July 9, 2025 1x08 Responding to the unexonerated innocent How can we trust the adversarial legal system to fix what it keeps breaking? 1x08 Responding to the unexonerated innocent 00:00 / 36:27 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) June 25, 2025 1x07 Does innocence even matter? Steph opens up about the wrongful conviction still hampering their full potential. 1x07 Does innocence even matter? 00:00 / 37:30 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) June 4, 2025 1x06 What is wrong with us? If you can start for free, why not try it? Especially if you can shift the costs to the powerful. 1x06 What is wrong with us? 00:00 / 40:43 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) May 28, 2025 1x05 How well is your wellbeing? We define wellness as your ability to fully function. Not by relieving pain but removing cause for pain. 1x05 How well is your wellbeing? 00:00 / 42:38 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) May 21, 2025 1x04 What seems to be your problem? What kinds of problems does need-response address? How is different from other options? 1x04 What seems to be your problem? 00:00 / 38:19 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) May 14, 2025 1x03 Where does it hurt? Do you settle for options that merely ease your pain? Why not let us help remove its cause? 1x03 Where does it hurt? 00:00 / 42:03 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) May 7, 2025 1x02 What do you need? Do we really need another type of professional service? 1x02 What do you need? 00:00 / 39:53 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) April 30, 2025 1x01 What is 'need-response'? What can this new service do we can’t get anywhere else? 1x01 What is 'need-response'? 00:00 / 42:43 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) April 16, 2025 1x00 Introducing need-response Steph and Gustavo opens the door to invite you into this amazing world of need-response. 1x00 Introducing need-response 00:00 / 05:14 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) January 30, 2025 Trailer Need-Response trailer Quick introduction to the new podcast by the Anankelogy Foundation Trailer Need-Response trailer 00:00 / 00:58 Episode features (exclusive to podcast subscribers) Subscribe now to get all podcast features (free) 1 1 ... 1 ... 1

Innocence Organizations The innocence movement includes innocence projects and law clinics that function independent of the criminal judicial system. By contrast, conviction integrity units function within the criminal judicial system. This list focuses on independent innocence entities. The information and links were up to date at the time this list was created. With your input , you can help us keep it up to date and ensure the links keep working. Thank you . Click here to quickly go to the bottom of this page AL 1 Cumberland Innocence Clinic Address : Samford University, Law School Clinics, 800 Lakeshore Drive , Birmingham, AL 35229 Phone : 205-726-2011 Email : rachel.martin@samford.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Alabama) AK 2 Alaska Innocence Project Address : PO Box 201656, Anchorage, AK 99520-1656 Phone: 907-279-0454 Email: info@alaskainnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Alaska) AZ 3 AZ Justice Project Address : 4001 N. 3rd Street, Ste 401, Phoenix, AZ 85012 Phone : 480-727-0009 Email : info@azjusticeproject.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Arizona), works with ASU Post-Conviction Clinic 4 Arizona Innocence Project Address : James E. Rogers College of Law, 1145 N. Mountain Ave., Tucson, AZ 85719 Phone: 520-626-5232 Email: law-clinics@arizona.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Arizona) AR 5 Midwest Innocence Project Address : 300 E 39th St, Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone : 816-221-2166 Email : office@themip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Iowa) CA 6 After Innocence Address: 5230 Boyd Ave., Oakland, CA 94618 Phone: (415) 307-3386 Email: info@after-innocence.org Services: Post-exoneree legal and social support for both DNA and non-DNA cases 7 California Innocence Advocates Address: 5318 E 2nd St. #999 Long Beach, CA 90803 Phone: 213-332-2850 Email: info@pcalaw.org Jurisdiction: Regional (California) 8 California Western Innocence and Justice Clinic Address: 225 Cedar St., San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: (619) 239-0391 Email: info@cwsl.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (California) 9 The Innocence Center Address: 6549 Mission Gorge Road, #379, San Diego, CA 92120 Phone: 619-928-2856 Email: info@theinnocencecenter.org Jurisdiction: Mixed (California, Hawai’i, & international) 10 Innocence OC Address: 301 Forest Ave, Laguna Beach CA 92651 Phone : 949-376-5730 Email : online form Jurisdiction : Regional (California: Kill Zone Theory) 11 Los Angeles Innocence Project Address: California Forensic Science Institute, 1800 Paseo Rancho Castilla, Los Angeles, CA 90032 Phone: 323-343-4640 Email: admin@innocencela.org Jurisdiction: City (Los Angelas County, California) 12 Loyola’s Project for the Innocent Address: Loyola Law School, 919 Albany Street, Los Angeles, CA 90015 Phone: 213.736.8141 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: City (Los Angelas County, California) 13 Northern California Innocence Project Address: 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA 95053 Phone: 408-554-4790 Email: ncip@scu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (California) CO 14 Korey Wise Innocence Project Address: University of Colorado Law School, Wolf Law Building, 401 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309 Phone: none provided Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Colorado) CT 15 Connecticut Innocence Project/PCU Address: 55 Farmington Ave, 8th Floor, Hartford, CT 06105 Phone: 860-258-4940 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut) 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) DE 17 Innocence Project Delaware Address: 4601 Concord Pike, Wilmington, DE 19803 Phone: 973-908-5906 Email: director@innocencede.org ; Contact us Jurisdiction: Regional (Delaware) DC 18 Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project Address: 1413 K Street NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-888-1766 Email: info@exonerate.org Jurisdiction: Regional (DC, Maryland, Virginia) FL 19 Innocence Project of Florida Address: 124 Marriott Drive, Suite 104, Tallahassee, FL 32301 Phone: 850-561-6767 Email: acarr@floridainnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Florida) 20 University of Miami Law Innocence Clinic Address: 1311 Miller Drive, Ste B400, Coral Gables, FL 33146 Phone: 305-284-8115 Email: miamiinnocence@law.miami.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Florida) GA 21 Georgia Innocence Project Address: 50 Hurt Plaza, Suite 350, Atlanta, GA 30303 Phone: 404-373-4433 Email: gip@georgiainnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Georgia) HI 22 Hawai'i Innocence Project Address: William S. Richardson School of Law, 2515 Dole Street, Suite 255, Honolulu, HI 96822 Phone: 808-956-6547 Email: contacthip@hawaiiinnocenceproject.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Hawaii) ID 23 Idaho Innocence Project Address: suspended operations for lack of funding Phone: TBD Email: TBD Jurisdiction: Regional (Idaho) IL 24 Illinois Innocence Project Address: Center for State Policy and Leadership, University of Illinois Springfield, One University Plaza, MS PAC 409, Springfield, IL 62703-5407 Phone: 217-206-6569 Email: iip@uis.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Illinois) 25 Exoneration Justice Clinic Address: 806 Howard Street, Suite 111, South Bend, IN 46617 Phone: 574-631-0677 Email: ndejc@nd.edu Jurisdiction: Mixed (primarily Indiana, some national and international cases) 26 Indiana Innocence Project Address: Mauer School of Law, 806 Howard Street, Suite 111, South Bend, IN 46617 Phone: 317-203-9608 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Indiana) 27 Wrongful Conviction Clinic Address: 530 W. New York St., Indianapolis, IN 46202-3225 Phone: 317-274-8523 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Indiana) IA 5 Midwest Innocence Project Address : 300 E 39th St, Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone : 816-221-2166 Email : office@themip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Iowa) IA 28 Wrongful Convictions Clinic Address: 6200 Park Ave, Suite 100, Des Moines, IA 50321 Phone: 515-412-0514 Email: exonerate@spd.state.ia.us (Director Erica Nichols Cook) Jurisdiction: Regional (Iowa) KS 5 Midwest Innocence Project Address : 300 E 39th St, Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone : 816-221-2166 Email : office@themip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Iowa) KY 29 Kentucky Innocence Project Address: Department of Public Advocacy, 5 Mill Creek Park, Frankfort, KY 40601 Phone: 502-564-8006 Email: info@kentuckyinnocenceproject.com Jurisdiction: Regional (Kentucky) LA 30 Innocence Project New Orleans Address: PO Box 792808, New Orleans, LA 70179-2808 Phone: 504-943-1905 (Fax) Email: info@ip-no.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Louisiana) ME 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) MD 18 Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project Address: 1413 K Street NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-888-1766 Email: info@exonerate.org Jurisdiction: Regional (DC, Maryland, Virginia) MD 31 U of Baltimore Innocence Project Clinic Address: 1420 N. Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21201 Phone: 410-837-5706 Email: esuter@ubalt.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Maryland) MA 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) MA 32 Boston College Innocence Program Address: 885 Centre St., Newton, MA 02459 Phone: 617-552-0639 Email: sharon.beckman@bc.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Massachusetts) 33 CPCS Innocence Program Address: 75 Federal Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02110 Phone: 617-209-5666 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Massachusetts) MI 34 Cooley Law School Innocence Project Address: 300 S. Capitol Avenue, Lansing, Michigan 48933 Phone: 517-371-5140 Email: innocence@cooley.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Michigan) 35 Michigan Innocence Clinic Address: University of Michigan Law School, 701 South State Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215 Phone: none provided Email: innocence@law.msu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional, non-DNA cases (Michigan) MN 36 Great North Innocence Project Copy Address: 229 19th Avenue South, Suite 285, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Phone: 612-624-4779 Email: info@gn-ip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota) MS 37 George C. Cochran Innocence Project Address: PO Box 1848, University, MS 38677-1848 Phone: 662-915-5207 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Mississippi) MO 5 Midwest Innocence Project Address : 300 E 39th St, Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone : 816-221-2166 Email : office@themip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Iowa) MT 38 Montana Innocence Project Address: PO Box 7607, Missoula, MT 59807 Phone: 406-243-6698 Email: info@mtinnocenceproject.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Montana) NE 5 Midwest Innocence Project Address : 300 E 39th St, Kansas City, MO 64111 Phone : 816-221-2166 Email : office@themip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Missouri, Kansas, Arkansas, Nebraska, and Iowa) NV 39 Innocence Center of Nevada Address: none provided Phone: none provided Email: toni@innocencenv.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Nevada) 40 Rocky Mountain Innocence Project Address: Rocky Mountain Innocence Center, 358 South 700 East, Suite B235, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 Phone: 801-355-1888 Email: contact@rminnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Nevada, Utah, Wyoming) NH 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) NJ 41 Centurion Ministries Address: 1000 Herrontown Rd., Princeton, NJ 08540 Phone: 609-921-0334 Email: info@centurion.org Jurisdiction: National (life or death row prisoners) 42 New Jersey Innocence Project Address: Rutgers Law School, 217 N. 5th Street, Camden, NJ 08102 Phone: none provided Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (New Jersey) 43 Last Resort Exoneration Project Address: Seton Hall University School of Law, One Newark Center, Newark, NJ 07102 Phone: 973-642-8087 or 973-761-9000 ext. 8087 Email: lesley.risinger@shu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (New Jersey) NM 44 New Mexico Innocence and Justice Project Address: PO Box 36719, Albuquerque, NM 87176 Phone: none provided Email: info@nmijp.org Jurisdiction: Regional (New Mexico) NY 45 Exoneration Initiative Address: 233 Broadway, Suite 2370, New York, NY 10279 Phone: 212.965.9335 Email: info@exi.org Jurisdiction: Regional (New York statewide) 47 LAS Wrongful Conviction Unit Address: 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 Phone: 212-577-3300 Email: wcu@legal-aid.org Jurisdiction: Regional (New York City) 48 OAD Reinvestigation Project Address: 11 Park Place, 16th Floor, New York, NY 10007 Phone: 212-402-4100 Email: info@oadnyc.org Jurisdiction: Regional (New York City) 49 NYLS Post-Conviction Innocence Clinic Address: 185 West Broadway, New York, NY 10013 Phone: 212-431-2100 Email: communications@nyls.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (New York statewide) 51 Pace University Law School Post-Conviction Project Address: 78 North Broadway, White Plains, NY 10603 Phone: 914-422-4333 Email: ddorfman@law.pace.edu or apribysh@law.pace.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (New York City and Westchester County) NC 52 Duke Law School Innocence Project Address: Duke Law School, 210 Science Drive, Box 90360, Durham, NC 27708 Phone: none provided Email: dukelawinnocenceproject@gmail.com Jurisdiction: Regional (North Carolina) 53 Duke Law School Wrongful Convictions Clinic Address: Duke Law School, 210 Science Drive, Box 90360, Durham, NC 27708 Phone: 919-613-7057 Email: jcoleman@law.duke.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (North Carolina) 54 NC Center on Actual Innocence Address: PO Box 52446, Shannon Plaza Station, Durham, NC 27717-2446 Phone: 919-489-3268 Email: admin@nccai.org Jurisdiction: Regional (North Carolina and South Carolina) 55 WFU LS Innocence and Justice Clinic Address: Wake Forest University, 1965 Wake Forest Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27109 Phone: 336-758-5430 Email: smrabil@wfu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (North Carolina) ND 36 Great North Innocence Project Address: 229 19th Avenue South, Suite 285, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Phone: 612-624-4779 Email: info@gn-ip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota) OH 56 Ohio Innocence Project Address: University of Cincinnati College of Law, 2925 Campus Green Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone: 513-556-6805 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Ohio) OK 58 The Oklahoma Innocence Project Address: 800 N. Harvey Ave., Oklahoma City, OK 73102 Phone: 405-208-6161 Email: innocence@okcu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Oklahoma) OR 59 Oregon Innocence Project Address: PO Box 5248, Portland, OR 97208 Phone: 503-944-2270, Fax: 971-279-4748 Email: info@oregoninnocence.info Jurisdiction: Regional (Oregon) PE 60 Pennsylvania Innocence Project Address: 1515 Market Street, Suite 300, Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: 215-204-4255 Email: info@PAinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Pennsylvania) 61 Wrongful Conviction Project Address: 3501 Sansom Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 Phone: 215-898-7483 Email: jesslip@penncareylaw.upenn.edu or aravenas@penncareylaw.upenn.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Pennsylvania) RI 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) PR 62 Puerto Rico Innocence Project Address: Universidad Interamericana de Puerto Rico, PO Box 70351, San Juan, PR 00936-9352 Phone: 787-751-1912, Ext. 2021 Email: PRoyectoinocencia@juris.inter.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Puerto Rico) SC 54 NC Center on Actual Innocence Copy Address: PO Box 52446, Shannon Plaza Station, Durham, NC 27717-2446 Phone: 919-489-3268 Email: admin@nccai.org Jurisdiction: Regional (North Carolina and South Carolina) 63 Palmetto Innocence Project Address: PO Box 11623, Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Phone: none provided Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (South Carolina) 64 Wofford’s South Carolina Innocence Initiative Address: 429 North Church Street, Spartanburg, SC 29303-3663 Phone: 864-597-4000 Email: Contact form Jurisdiction: Regional (South Carolina) SD 36 Great North Innocence Project Address: 229 19th Avenue South, Suite 285, Minneapolis, MN 55455 Phone: 612-624-4779 Email: info@gn-ip.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota) TN 65 Tennessee Innocence Project Address: 700 Craighead Street, Suite 300, Nashville, TN 37204 Phone: 615-581-7230 Email: info@tninnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Tennessee) TX 66 Actual Innocence Clinic Address: The University of Texas School of Law, 727 E. Dean Keeton St., Austin, TX 78705 Phone: 512-471-5151 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) 67 Budd Innocence Center Address: 727 East Dean Keeton St. Austin, TX 78705 Phone: 512-471-1317 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) 68 Innocence Project of Texas Address: 300 Burnett Street, Suite 160, Fort Worth, TX 76102 Phone: none provided Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) 69 Joyce Ann Brown Innocence Clinic Address: 106 S Harwood St, Dallas, TX 75201 Phone: none provided Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) 70 The Texas Innocence Network Address: Criminal Justice Institute, University of Houston Law Center, 4170 Martin Luther King Blvd, Houston, TX 77204-6060 Phone: 713-743-7552 Email: CJI@uh.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) 71 TMSL Innocence Project Address: 3100 Cleburne Street, STE 100 Houston, Texas 77004 Phone: 713-313-1139 Email: none provided Jurisdiction: Regional (Texas) UT 40 Rocky Mountain Innocence Project Address: Rocky Mountain Innocence Center, 358 South 700 East, Suite B235, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 Phone: 801-355-1888 Email: contact@rminnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Nevada, Utah, Wyoming) VT 16 New England Innocence Project Address: 1035 Cambridge Street, Suite 28A, Cambridge, MA 02141 Phone: 617-945-0762 Email: general @newenglandinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont) VA 72 Innocence Project at UVA School of Law Address: 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 Phone: 434-924-7354 Email: comm@law.virginia.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Virginia) VA 18 Mid-Atlantic Innocence Project Address: 1413 K Street NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-888-1766 Email: info@exonerate.org Jurisdiction: Regional (DC, Maryland, Virginia) WA 73 Washington Innocence Project Address: PO Box 85869, Seattle, WA 98145 Phone: 206-636-9479 Email: online form Jurisdiction: Regional (Washington) WV 74 West Virginia Innocence Project Address: West Virginia University College of Law, PO Box 6130, Morgantown, WV 26506 Phone: 304-293-7249 Email: wvulaw@mail.wvu.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (West Virginia) WI 75 Wisconsin Innocence Project Address: Frank J. Remington Center, University of Wisconsin Law School, 975 Bascom Mall, 4318e Law Building, Madison, WI 53706-1399 Phone: 608-262-2240 Email: rburg2@wisc.edu or christopher.lau@wisc.edu Jurisdiction: Regional (Wisconsin) WY 40 Rocky Mountain Innocence Project Address: Rocky Mountain Innocence Center, 358 South 700 East, Suite B235, Salt Lake City, UT 84102 Phone: 801-355-1888 Email: contact@rminnocence.org Jurisdiction: Regional (Nevada, Utah, Wyoming) US national 76 The Innocence Project Address: 40 Worth St., Suite 701, New York, NY 10013 Phone: 212-364-5340 Email: info@innocenceproject.org Jurisdiction: Broad (US nationwide) 77 Center on Wrongful Convictions Address: Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, 375 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611-3069 Phone: 312-503-2391 Email: cwc@law.northwestern.edu Jurisdiction: Broad (US nationwide) Transition 78 After Innocence Address: 5230 Boyd Ave., Oakland, CA 94618 Phone: 415-307-3386 Email: info@after-innocence.org Services: Post-exoneree legal and social support for both DNA and non-DNA cases 79 Exonerated Nation Address: PO Box 20241, American Canyon, CA 94503 Phone: 707-656-5994 Email: info@exoneratednation.org or obie@exoneratednation.org Jurisdiction : Regional (California) 80 Exoneration Project Chicago : 311 N. Aberdeen St., Floor 3, Suite E, Chicago, IL 60607 New York : 310 Lenox Avenue, Floor 3, New York, NY 10027 Ohio : 6515 Longshore Loop, Suite 100, Dublin, OH 43017 Washington, D.C. : 126 C St. NW, Floor 2, Washington, DC 20001 Phone: 312-789-4955 Email: info@exonerationproject.org Jurisdiction: Broad (US nationwide) Services: Post-release financial and social support for both DNA and Non-DNA Cases 81 Healing Justice Project Address: 11312 US 15-501 N, Suite 107 – #181, Chapel Hill, NC 27517 Phone: none provided Email : connect@healingjusticeproject.org Service: Works to prevent and alleviate the harms caused to all by wrongful convictions through advocacy, education, and direct support. 82 Witness to Innocence Address: 1501 Cherry Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102 Phone: 267-519-4584 Email: info@witnesstoinnocence.org Jurisdiction: Broad (US nationwide) Publicizing Making an Exoneree Address: 509 7th Street NW, Washington, DC 20004 Phone: 202-934-0121 Email: prisonsandjustice@georgetown.edu Service: Georgetown University course leading students to create short documentaries and social media campaigns that spotlight a few compelling cases of the innocent in prison. The Marshall Project A curated collection of links of articles about the wrongly convicted innocent. Resourceful lists for the wrongly convicted innocent The Innocence Network AALL List of Innocence Projects Prison Activist Resources National Registry of Exonerations Convicting the Innocent Back to the top Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link

4O4 Oops Oops Oops Oops Oops Nothing here but a vast ocean. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what you're looking for. OR Go Back Home There seems to be nothing here. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what your looking for. Back to Homepage

4O4 Oops Oops Oops Oops Oops Nothing here but a vast ocean. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what you're looking for. OR Go Back Home There seems to be nothing here. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what your looking for. Back to Homepage

4O4 Oops Oops Oops Oops Oops Nothing here but a vast ocean. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what you're looking for. OR Go Back Home There seems to be nothing here. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what your looking for. Back to Homepage

4O4 Oops Oops Oops Oops Oops Nothing here but a vast ocean. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what you're looking for. OR Go Back Home There seems to be nothing here. Try the SEARCH FIELD at the top to find what your looking for. Back to Homepage