Search Results

Glossary B biostructural pain (n. ) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

Any unquenchable desire becomes another pain. < Back D06 Pain Principle List of all principles Any unquenchable desire becomes another pain. Image: Pixabay – jplenio (click on meme to see source image) Summary The less you can resolve a need, the less you can function. Which feels painful. The less you can replenish what your life requires to function, the more your body warns you of this limitation as a threat. If unable to eat anything all day, you experience your obsessive hunger as something painful. Talking about pain can also refer to the painful desires you can ever adequately satisfy. Description Which do you think is more likely? Pain is pain and desire is desire and there is little these have in common. OR Unsatisfied desire can present as a threat that you experience it as a form of pain. Anankelogy If you haven’t eaten anything in over a day, your craving for food naturally grows intense. Eventually, your hunger feels painful. Your body warns of a threat to your access to food. And you feel that warningas a form of pain. Just as “biostructural pain” sends missed warnings to your body to experience, you can also experience in your body the missed signal to replenish something emotional. The more you ignore your feelings of isolation and loneliness, for example, the more your body may warn you of this threat to your full functioning by prompting you to feel intensely hungry for interpersonal connection. You know when you misinterpret this feeling as literal hunger when the feeling persists no matter how much you eat or drink. When feeling a burning hunger even after enjoying a full meal, ask yourself, What must I replenish in my life? When feeling thirsty for something sweet or for something intoxicating, ask yourself why? What emotional need have I been neglecting? Dig deeper still and you may realize you are not so much missing the message but feel powerless to do much about it. Need-response addresses these deeper causes to your unquenchable desires. Need-response Need-response challenges our popular consumerism reactions. Instead of placating any hunger or thirst with something pleasurable to eat or drink, we drill down to identify and address your neglected emotional needs. Reactive Problem The more powerless you feel you can fully satisfy your emotional needs, the more vulnerable to reacting to your unquenchable desires. Conventional wisdom touts willpower and your responsibility to make proper choices. But you can only choose options available to you at the moment of these emotional and physical needs. If you require a moment of solitude to reconnect with your authentic self, but must acquiesce to powerful pressures to forgo solitude—less you lose your freedom or means of income—no amount of willpower or right choices will matter much. Such popular philosophies, although grounded in reliable wisdom, tends to pull us into reacting to our pain. To distract us from ultimately resolving our painful needs. Responsive Solution Need-response address the power relation dynamics that easily interfere with your ability to fully resolve all of your needs. The NR301 program equips you with a viable way to incentivize the powerful to respond better to these overlooked needs. You learn to approach them as an equal. You’re both human, with real human needs. You both prefer less pain. You both can cause less pain in the other. You both can do more to mutually respect each other’s vulnerable needs. The more you can help each other to resolve each other’s affected needs, the better you can address your own unsatiable desires. There is no such thing as desire apart from some need to replenish what your body reports as lacking. If the primary resource you need to fully function proves inaccessible, your body suggests an alternative . If that’s unavailable, you can always pursue some substitute that only eases the pain. But if those in powerful positions seek legitimacy, let them enable you to access more of the primary resources your life naturally desires to fully function in life. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: How can I tell the difference between emotional and physical hunger during a fast? How does this relate to overeating and any associated health problems? The more I can fully function after addressing each need, the less hungry I notice myself feeling. Will eating properly help me recognize when my hunger reports something I must replenish? Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

< Back Pennsylvania Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back Exoneration Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

< Back Arizona Innocence Project not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

The more an authority undermines resolving needs, the less its legitimacy. < Back F02 Authority Principle List of all principles The more an authority undermines resolving needs, the less its legitimacy. Image: Pixabay – PublicDomainPictures (click on meme to see source image) Summary Authority earns its trust the more its actions or inactions results in resolving needs. The more its actions or unexpected inactions results in unresolved needs, experienced as pain and diminished ability to function, the less it can be trusted to impact needs. Legitimacy of any authority correlates with how it impacts the exposed needs of the vulnerable. Description Which do you think is more likely? Questioning authority in the way of resolving needs can only make things worse. OR The more authority impedes me from resolving needs, the more I must speak up. Anankelogy Legitimacy can be defined as the right and acceptance of an authority , or the justification of coercive power as a right to rule, or the belief that a rule, institution, or leader has the right to govern , or widespread public confidence in the government to ensure political stability. What all these definitions lack, and many like it, is any reference to needs. Anankelogy adds the dimension of our objectively existing needs . Authority can flexibly adjust to be more legitimate by being more trustworthy to recognize and allow resolution of our inflexible needs . This effectively challenges the conventional yet arbitrary aspect of legitimacy. Since your needs exist as objective facts that you subjectively experience, legitimacy can be graded by how it measurably impacts your capacity to fully function. We shift the focus of legitimacy away from your subjective dependence upon it, which can be coerced. The less we can all objectively function because of some relatively arbitrary authority, the less objectively legitimate that authority. Anankelogy distinguishes between subjectively accepted authority and objectively qualified authority —referred to respectively as ascribed legitimacy and earned legitimacy . Legitimacy naturally declines the less responsive an authority to the needs in its care. And current systems remain poorly equipped to accountably respond to the immovable reality of our objective needs. It easily trips over its own efforts to improve its ascribed legitimacy , typically compromising its potential for earned legitimacy . Consequently, our trust in elite-led institutions continues to break down. Consider your own level of confidence in legacy media, representative democracy, polarizing politics, and the adversarial judicial system. Anankelogy addresses the widely overlooked problems these all have in common: avoidant adversarialism . Each one incentivizes you to avoid life’s natural discomforts of resolving needs by pitting us against each other for some fleeting sense of relief from the pain it mindlessly perpetuates. Need-response Need-response anchors legitimacy in responsiveness to all of our needs. There is no such thing as pain apart from unresolved needs . These divisive institutions lack vision for how to enable you and I to optimally resolve our needs. They instead tend to normalize the tolerable pain of our unmet needs. They rarely if ever incentivize us to endure discomforts long enough to resolve these needs, which would remove cause for pain. These divisive institutions routinely coerce us to prefer the pain we feel over the pain we fear . We come to see them as the best or only option to cope with the constant ringing alarm of our unmet needs. But letting them incite us into taking sides against teach other to ease our pain tends to leave us in more pain . Pain is not the problem as much as the threats your pain exists to report . Divisive institutions regularly leave such threats in place. Then benefit from keeping you attached to their insidious machinations. Until you eventually get disgusted and start seeing them less as a solution and more as part of the problem. Reactive Problem Legitimacy naturally declines the more it coerces us into relying upon it to ease the pain of our unmet needs over resolving those needs. The more we wake up to realize such institutions coax our dependency to ease the pain from conditions it helps create, the less we can trust them. Especially when we realize that the more they benefit from keeping us unwell, the more blind they are to their own conflicts of interest. Let’s unpack the problem of avoidant adversarialism in each mass institution. Legacy media . To attract your attention, mainstream media outlets segment you as a part of a marketable audience. They incentivize you into indulgent side-taking to avoid empathizing with each other. You get a biased perspective, which erodes their trustworthiness as a reliable source of news. Representative democracy . To attract political support, elected leaders tend to cater to what they think you want over what you actually need. They routinely avoid facing your real-life issues as potentially costing them politically. They tend to favor donors’ interests over yours, which erodes their trustworthiness as a reliable local leader. Polarizing politics . To attract voters, candidates take stances on those politicized issues they believe will draw you and a majority of others to the polls. They pit you against others with a different inflexible priority of needs , to trap you into unwinnable conflicts. As your politicized needs and the needs of others remain mostly unresolved, politician’s trustworthiness erodes. Adversarial judiciary . To win in a court battle, lawyers on each side try to manipulate you into accept their interpretations of the available facts. They expect you and the other side to remain at mutually defensive odds, avoiding relevant details that could actually resolve your conflict. Their emphasis of procedural fairness over just outcomes erodes confidence in the courts. The more these divisive institutions get in the way of letting you resolve your needs, the less objectively legitimate in the eyes of anankelogy and need-response. Responsive Solution Need-response lays out a path for authority figures and institutions to earn the right to affect your needs. You and others evaluate an authority’s reliability to impact your objective needs . You empirically evaluate their actions and then categorize them on one of five legitimacy levels . Offensive illegitimacy . Authority harms the vulnerable, provoking more needs than helping to resolve. E.g., divisive law enforcement violently suppressing peaceful antiwar protesters. Substandard legitimacy . Authority acknowledges the needs they impact but only offers to pacify the pain instead of resolving such needs. E.g., law enforcement stops a thief from stealing your property without protecting your property from further thefts. Standard legitimacy . Authority demonstrates mutual regard that openly relates to everyone’s needs as worthy of the same respect as their own needs. E.g., law enforcement officers confront apparent law breakers as they would have any other officer confront their wrongdoing. Competitive legitimacy . Authority addresses their constituents’ needs more effectively than others to improve own professional reputation. E.g., law enforcement coordinates with community support organizations to reduce or eliminate common contributors to violence, so that together they can demonstrate their community is safer than other communities with a more passive aggressive law enforcement approach. Transformative legitimacy . Authority proactively addresses needs by transforming constraining norms into something more responsive to everyone’s needs. E.g., law enforcement officers walk a beat and get to know each community member on a more personal level, sometimes going out of their way to help someone with a personal problem. You learn to incentivize authority without being adversarial. You model the mutuality that we seek from them. You develop the skills to speak truth to power by first offering helpful feedback to your peers. You nurture each other’s “responsive reputation ”. You effectively compete with the disappointing results of adversarial authority. If your actions can measurably result in more resolved needs, such as a measurable reduction in addictive behaviors, you create value we all need. And authority needs. We raise the bar. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Resolved needs improve your understanding. < Back C03 General Principle List of all principles Resolved needs improve your understanding. Image: Pixabay - Tama66 (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more your needs fully resolve, the more your thinking gets freed up for other things. The less your needs resolve, the less you can focus on anything but those emotionally pressing needs. You naturally prioritize functioning first. The more your needs resolve, the further you can reach your functioning capacity. The less you will then be distracted by emotional pressures or distorting biases. You can then absorb more input into what actually exists. Your expansive attention to soak in more truth can lead to a series of epiphanies. Instead of clinging to generalizations offering relief, you encounter more of reality. Description Which do you think is more likely? Your feelings must continually be checked by rational thinking and democratic laws. OR You can understand more when your mind is not compelled to focus on pressing needs. Anankelogy Everything you understand fits in some way with your ability to function. If anything gets in the way of your capacity to fully function, your mind can hardly focus on anything else but its priority to keep your life going. If you did not understand how falling off a tall cliff could kill you, your mind could entertain fancy ideas of gliding over the edge with a pair of untested homemade wings. But once aware of the dangers, your understanding bends to prioritize your survival . Your biases prioritize your need , your self-continuance. You believe what your life requires you think as true or not . If they didn’t, you risk not being around to contemplate less important things than your own survival. As soon as you perceive any threat to your wellbeing, this priority for your self-continuance commandeers your understanding. Everything else must wait. This innate priority to persist unscathed fuels your motivated reasoning . To paraphrase Upton Sinclair , it’s difficult to get someone to understand something when their paycheck requires them to not understand it. Your interpretation of the situation will tend to amplify what seems beneficial, potentially exaggerate what could hold you back, and filter out what seems irrelevant. Your reasoning serves your motivation to continue without painful risks to your wellbeing. This dynamic often kicks in to avoid the pain itself. Your ability to think clearly can easily fall off the cliff when compelled to avoid the very warning that serves your self-continuance interests. Pain is not the problem as much as the threats they exist to warn you about . The more your needs resolve, the less pain to distract your thinking or to twist your understanding. Need-response The more your needs resolve, the more reliable your intuition. Your instincts serve you well when grounded on the reality of what previously led to your full wellbeing without infringing on others. Your more accurate conclusions provide a more reliable lens for framing your perceptions. Of course, the opposite is true. The less your needs resolve, then the less reliable your intuition. Your unresolved needs prioritize your attention toward their increasingly urgent relief. Your innate priority to ensure your continued functioning willingly takes cognitive shortcuts. As your needs resolve, your attention can soak in more of what you observe as actually there. Your mind integrates this input. When seeing what attracts other’s interest in you, for example, you don’t have to stumble around trying to get on their good side. Your understanding improves to appreciate what is real. Each time a familiar need recurs, you instantly can rely on your perceptions. You can rely on your understanding of what’s happening. You can respond quickly, without much reflection. You can enjoy your need resolving again. That’s the wonder of your reality-cultivated intuition. Reactive Problem Bombardments of stimuli in modern society tend to overtax our mental capacities. The less we filter out the less relevant, the more sensations we feel pulled to process. It’s easy to feel overwhelmed. To manage this cognitive load, we often draw on our generalizations and categorizations. Instead of processing the inputs ourselves, we accept other’s processing as sufficient. Sometimes, that is not enough. Worse, the generalizations and categorizations of others may throw you completely off . Consequently, we’ve become a hyperrational society. We process less emotionally rich content. And try to force our needs to fit neatly into rational constructs that avoid messy details. When this results in poor outcomes, we typically revert the same failed routines trapping us in pain. When someone complains of a need they cannot resolve, we’re slow to listen and quick to argue. We’re slow to empathize and quick to take an opposing side. We’re slow to fully understand and quick to categorize and overgeneralize—for our own relief ultimately at their expense. If honest with ourselves, we’d admit we endure the slow burning pain of many unresolved needs. You likely don’t feel fully understood by anyone. You likely don’t feel fully accepted for who you uniquely are. You likely don’t enjoy the peace of living up to your full potential. We’ve all become accustomed to living lives of quiet desperation. And if honest, we don’t really understand why. Responsive Solution Responsivism —the belief and practice to respond better to the needs of others—counters the limits of “adversarialism ”. The more personally responsive to the needs of others, the less we feel we must oppose others we don’t actually understand. The more you can replace habits of avoiding others with routines of engaging each other, the better you can understand others and understand yourself. The more you can replace habits of alienation with norms of mutual encounters, the more you can face the reality that our hyperrationality easily ignores. This speaks to an advantage of anankelogy over other social sciences. Anankelogy recognizes how the biases of the anankelogist can be reduced or cleared up when the anankelogist is held accountable to promptly and fully resolve each need. The more responsive the need-responders to their own needs, the more they can be trusted to be professionally responsive to the needs of others. With responsivism , you can develop the skills to become a professional need-responder . Responsivism equips you to rebuild your interpersonal routines. You’re incentivized to resolve needs, and not settle for self-defeating relief from your unmet needs’ recurring pain. You sharpen the habit of engaging others despite the momentary discomforts while being vulnerable. You shift from develop the skills of cultivating mutual understanding, shutting down reason for mutual defensiveness that keeps us in the dark. You open our world to fresh understanding. You take in new insights that can liberate your life. As more of your needs fully resolve, and you support others to resolve their needs, you find a depth of understanding you may not have realized even existed. You can then richly understand the underappreciated scope of the full power of love. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: Surely I will not fully understand reality simply because my needs are better satisfied. I suspect there is more to cognitive distortions than unaddressed needs. What about false beliefs that form from trusting bad sources? Doesn’t motivated reasoning have a lot to do with conflicts of interest? Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

< Back Centurion Ministries not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

This is for any wrongly convicted innocent underserved by the adversarial judicial system. When even innocence litigators cannot find merit in your innocence claim, now you can use this form to demonstrate the merits of your overlooked case. If litigators still resist, we move onto Responsive Innocence. About Introducing Anankelogy the book: You NEED This Anankelogy Principles Glossary Need-response Need help? Need-responders Pricing NR podcast NR Community Engagement Book Online Groups Development Estimated Innocence Form Are you or someone you know wrongly convicted and not yet exonerated? Prove your innocence without lawyers Let the organized facts of your case automatically calculate the viability of your innocence claim. download form Download the EIF First name Last name Claimant's first name Email Message (optional) I accept terms & conditions How do I publicize the resulting ‘likely innocence’ on your Innocence Profiles page? I am open to receiving info about alternatives to the adversarial legal system. Download this free interactive tool Innocence projects take cases slipping through the cracks of the appellate process. But who takes cases slipping through the cracks in the innocence movement stuck on adversarial law? Need-response does. First, we demonstrate the viability of your innocence claim, for yourself or for your wrongly convicted loved one. This form automatically compares your claim with those already exonerated. Then calculates the degree which your claim merits attention by those who can support you. Innocence litigator? Click here to go to the page that's just for you. Phase One of Exoneration Services Do It Yourself Instructions While waiting for the authorities to recognize your innocence, you instantly get a Certificate of Verifiable Innocence. You get to immediately announce your estimated innocence for all to see. Use it to convince others of your overlooked wrongful conviction. Give the innocence movement reason to review your case next. Instantly get your own Notification of Verifiable Innocence. Inform others of your compelling case of innocence in a single page. Debunk the myth that all felons claim innocence. Quickly show others the problem of wrongful convictions. Boost your score with independent verification. Be among the first to use this and help create history. Simple to use: Download for free. Fill in all the white fields. See your estimated innocence score. Estimated Innocence shifts from an imprecise guilt-acquittal binary to citing a continuum between likely guilt to likely innocence. The more your case matches those already exonerated, the higher your estimated innocence score. Does yours show a strong claim? Unfortunately, Innocence projects routinely receive more requests than they can serve. Criminal courts routinely deny their errors and typically are not incentivized to take responsibility for their costly mistakes. It takes them a long time to review each case, forcing you to wait years to find justice. Fortunately... You now have an alternative to the slow legal process. Check out a PDF sample of the empty form and completed form . Print and send this paper form to your incarcerated claimant. Then transcribe it into the electronic form. See how much compensation you might be owed, plus much more. Download the form today to see what your estimated innocence can do for you. Need-response regards all wrongly convicted innocents overlooked by the adversarial legal process as "unexonerated ". We might publicize your case of viable innocence right here. And draw attention to improve public resources for clearing such viable claims. We could list your case alongside others. We could demonstrate to the world your unmet need for justice. Justice delayed is justice denied. Perhaps for not much longer! When you are ready to upload your completed EIF spreadsheet file, click the button below. Publicize my innocence Your participation can help demonstrate the need to improve the capacity for innocence projects and conviction review units to process more viable claims. Or perhaps demonstrate the need for a more responsive alternative to the adversarial legal process. Such as need-response. EIF aim 01 EIF aim 02 EIF aim 12 EIF aim 01 1/12 The EIF exists to serve at least a dozen aims. If you still cannot get any help for your claim, and have exhausted all available options in the adversarial legal process, consider transcending it with Responsive Innocence . Once you can show a strong case for innocence , you shouldn't have to accept 'no' for an answer. Join us in our Unexonerated Facebook group. Together, we can improve our chances for exoneration. The Unexonerated The Unexonerated The Unexonerated The Unexonerated NOTE: This was orginally available on the ValueRelating.com website. That site will soon be phased out. If you previously downloaded the EIF there, find more support for it here. If the link did not work, you'll find this one is more effective. This continues to be a work in progress. Your constructive feedback to help improve it is appreciated. If you have a suggestion or a question, click here . One last thing... Any injustice in the name of justice is no justice at all . Currently requires MS Excel or reader to utilize. After you download the spreadsheet, it will open in PROTECTED VIEW. Click on Enable Editing to start using it. The form will not work until you do. Ready to download it now? Download the "estimated innocence form" interactive tool By using this tool, you agree with our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . If these terms and this policy do not fit your need, you are not to use this tool. We welcome you to contact us to suggest how we can fit these to your particular needs.

This is for any wrongly convicted innocent underserved by the adversarial judicial system. When the adversarial system cannot admit or correct its own repeated errors, we present a mutalizing alternative to serve overlooked needs for which the law exists to serve. About Introducing Anankelogy the book: You NEED This Anankelogy Principles Glossary Need-response Need help? Need-responders Pricing NR podcast NR Community Engagement Book Online Groups Development Responsive Innocence Wrongly convicted and disillusioned with the legalistic innocence movement ? Succeed where the law fails Let us take your compelling estimated innocence to the pioneering new level of public exoneration . fresh approach - download If you already downloaded and filled out the Estimated Innocence Form Try a fresh approach First name Last name Email Message (optional) I accept terms & conditions I want to learn how to use this tool. Download free interactive tool Download "responsive innocence" interactive tool Innocence projects take cases slipping through the cracks of the appellate process. But who takes cases slipping through the cracks in the innocence movement stuck on adversarial law? Need-response does. First, we demonstrate the viability of your innocence claim, for yourself or for your wrongly convicted loved one. This form automatically compares your claim with those already exonerated. Then calculates the degree which your claim merits attention by those who can support you. Phase Two of Exoneration Services The Estimated Innocence Form supports a legal claim of actual innocence . You can use it to help innocence litigants quickly spot where in your case to get you or your loved one back into court. But what if that proves insufficient? What recourse do you have if the adversarial system keeps refusing to hear your case? What if you need more than this... Estimated Innocence Form for innocence litigators For the neglected innocent Innocence litigators and activists know they face an uphill battle when working within the adversarial system. They recognize the chances remain slip to clear all wrongly convicted innocents. Do we enable the unresponsive adversarial system when not challenging it with a more responsive alternative? from here or from Value Relating , this next interactive form provides you an alternative to the unresponsive adversarial judicial process. You learn how to challenge the built-in limits of their legalistic adversarial approach with a more engaging mutuality approach toward full exoneration. From challenge to opportunity Despite my own compelling innocence claim, I've been repeatedly underserved by the adversarial judicial process. Instead of giving up in utter disappointment or disillusionment, I'm offering the failing judicial system a more responsive way. I'm showing them how need-response can reduce violence and crime by resolving more needs. Their antagonistic approach can accomplish only so much. When the adversarial judicial process fails to recognize and correct its many mistakes, it's time to consider a less antagonistic alternative. It's time to consider a viable alternative. It's time to replace their unresponsive adversarial approach with a much more responsive mutuality approach. Need-response challenges the unresponsiveness of the adversarial process with a more responsive mutual process. Instead of opposing each other for only one side to win, need-response counters with a win-win option to respect the affected needs on all sides of a conflict. Who would oppose that? Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p01 Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p02 Your current options Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p14 Impactors list (4 of 4) Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p01 1/14 From unresponsive to responsive wellness initiative If your EIR shows you have a strong or even a good claim for actual innocence, and the adversarial judicial process persists in denying your case, a wellness campaign can introduce all those involved to our more responsive alternative. A wellness campaign addresses the many underserved needs overlooked by the adversarial judicial process. A wellness campaign shifts focus from what serves the winner in a court battle to what resolves the unchosen needs on all sides of a conflict. In five phases, the campaign attracts support for your innocence by challenging the limits of the adversarial approach. It negates reluctance to address needs by addressing each other's affected needs. Be skeptical before you try This alternative works best for those giving up hope on the adversarial judicial process. This new approach may not work for you if there's still hope for a favorable adjudicated outcome. Before you try this alternative approach... Follow one in progress This alternative continues to evolve. It's founder is currently applying it to their own case. You can see for yourself how it works for them. Follow Steph's wellness campaign EIF aim 01 EIF aim 02 EIF aim 12 EIF aim 01 1/12 Help make some history Your input could help to improve this. Let's learn together how to incentivize these powerholders to improve their responsiveness to these opportunities. Let's support their career to create just outcomes by exonerating those the adversarial system fails. One responsive innocent at a time. Any injustice in the name of justice is no justice at all . Currently requires MS Excel or reader to utilize. After you download the spreadsheet, it will open in PROTECTED VIEW. Click on Enable Editing to start using it. The form will not work until you do. Ready to try a new way? Download "responsive innocence" interactive tool By using this tool, you agree with our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . If these terms and this policy do not fit your need, you are not to use this tool. We welcome you to contact us to suggest how we can fit these to your particular needs.

< Back Exoneration Initiative not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

8 < Back to list A. Character refunction 8 A reconciliation 8 .1 A Need experience 8 .2 A Defunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction relationally lowers your ability to fully function. It is typically framed with more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 8 .3 A Refunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction could be turned around to raise your ability to function. It also uses more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 8 .4 A Example(s) This subsection offers some examples of this defunction you may observe affecting your life. Usually more than one example is provided. If reading this, there are no examples yet to this defunction. 8 .5 A Associated defunctions This subsection points to similar or applicable defunctions. If reading this, there are no defunctions specifically associated with this defunction. 8 .6 A Relevant refunctions This subsection points to relevant or complementary refunctions. If reading this, there are no relevant defunctions to correlate with this defunction. 8 .7 A Applicable principles This subsection points to those anankelogical principles that aptly apply to this defunction. If reading this, there are no anankelogical principles related specifically to this defunction. 8 .8 A Referenced blog posts This subsection points to those blog entries that relate to, or cite, this particular defunction. If reading this, there are no blog entries yet related specifically to this defunction. Date created: 8/29/23 Type: Date revised: A. Character refunction The more you rebuild your trustworthiness after admitting a wrong, the more your needs resolve. After letting go of your anger with forgiveness, continue nurturing the relationship by offering to restore any losses. Rebuild trust by compensating others for any damage for actions caused. Respect where others cannot go on without restoring what they’ve lost. Connect with others where they hurt, with empathetic generosity. Respond to other's gestures toward you who seek to rebuild any damaged trust. See how atonement resolves needs. Previous Next Discuss at our Engagement forum