top of page

Search Results

Is this what you were looking for?

304 results found with an empty search

  • Martinez | AnankelogyFoundation

    The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Ricardo Martinez NY Ricardo Martinez Estimated innocence score: 92 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated coerced into a plea deal to avoid deportation Highlights of this wrongful conviction - coerced eyewitness misidentification - forensic expert misinterpreted lab results - investigator manipulated evidence - jail informant lied Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? central factor major factor central factor major factor central factor major factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 29 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in NY of: human trafficking Wrongly convicted on October 20, 2017 Sentence: life Custody status: other Dive deeper into Ricardo's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Ricardo's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Ricardo's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Ricardo's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Ricardo Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 0 Clearly innocent 0 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Ricardo Martinez Follow my Public Exoneration campaign. Consider becoming an active supporter for as little as $4.99 per week. Invest in restoring claimant’s freedom. Invest in yourself. Proxy for innocence claimant: Diego Garcia Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Ricardo The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Ricardo The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Ricardo If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >

  • California Innocence Advocates | AnankelogyFoundation

    < Back California Innocence Advocates not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

  • Support my campaign | AnankelogyFoundation

    Support NAME to speak truth to power The Anankelogy Foundation offers revolutionary programs for below cost, and the first one is provided free of charge. These programs equip program participants to serve as certified need-responders . Help us offset the costs with a generous gift. Help us spread the love of respecting the needs of others as we would have them respect our own. Thank you. If this space remains blank after about five seconds, then please reload this page in your browser . Some of our financial needs: Website Internet service Virtual office rental Legal fees for filing nonprofit status and more!

  • Reed | AnankelogyFoundation

    The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Marcus Reed FL Marcus Reed Estimated innocence score: 84 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated 2nd autopsy shows signs of suicide but jury never saw it Highlights of this wrongful conviction - victim previously assaulted defendant - victim violated restraining order - Brady violation of withheld autopsy - victim had shared suicidal thoughts Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 8 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in FL of: homicide Wrongly convicted on January 30, 1998 Sentence: life without parole Custody status: prison Dive deeper into Claimant's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Claimant's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Claimant's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Claimant's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Marcus Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 0 Clearly innocent 0 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Marcus Reed I am considering a Public Exoneration campaign. Perhaps my proxy and I will follow another campaign and see how it works out for them. Proxy for innocence claimant: Sara Reed Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Marcus The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Marcus The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Marcus If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >

  • 9. Balancing masculine boldness with feminine shyness | AnankelogyFoundation

    < Back 9. Balancing masculine boldness with feminine shyness Do you prioritize one gender side over another? Or do you integrate both? Masculine focused If you're more rational than emotional, your needs best met with a more emotional emphasis naturally seeks some balance. One way nature prompts you to fill this void is through sexual energy, to compel you to pursue the complementary emotionality you currently lack. Whether stereotypically in a woman or perhaps in an emotionally attuned man. The less you integrate your rational qualities with emotional maturity, the more prone to swing between extremes of irrationality and unemotionality. For example, _________ The more you blend your rational qualities with emotional maturity, the more needs you can resolve and remove cause for pain. For example, becoming both reasonable and intuitive enables you to _________ Feminine focused If you're more emotional than rational, your needs best met with a more rational emphasis naturally seeks some balance. One way nature prompts you to fill this void is through sexual energy, to compel you to pursue the complementary rationality you currently lack. Whether stereotypically in a man or perhaps in a rationally minded woman. toward balance Cyclic balancing of these gender-associated traits Vacillating between opposing extremes Balancing complementary sides Oscillating toward a balanced center Encountering the holistic center Transspiritually compelled holism Conventional reaction to transspirituality The more attached to conventional norms, the more one tends to guard the comforting familiarity of pragmatism creep . text text Saturday, November 1, 2025 at 8:58:14 PM UTC Previous Next

  • B04 Basic Principle

    Your feelings alert you to the status of your needs. < Back B04 Basic Principle List of all principles Your feelings alert you to the status of your needs. Image: Pixabay – PublicDomainPictures (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more your functioning becomes limited from some unresolved need, the more your feelings call attention to it. Initially, such feelings remain vague. Then often out of the blue, they turn alarmingly urgent. Usually with something you could do right away to ease the pressure. You could react on this feeling. Or you could dig deeper into what your feelings can only suggest is really happening. Properly responding dissolves its intensity. Description Which do you think is more likely? You address your needs by rationally thinking through each one. OR You address routine needs with the autopilot of your healthy feelings. Anankelogy Every feeling you feel comes with its own level of intensity. The more your need-conveying emotions sense your ability to function is held back, the more intense the emotion. As your ability to function goes back to your functional norm, the feeling naturally subsides. Let’s use some common needs to illustrate the ups and downs of emotions. Self-determination . Consider your need to define your own path in life. If right now you can freely pursue your own purpose in life, you likely do not feel any urgency to do your own thing if already doing it. But the more your ability to function requires a level of self-determination you find elusive, the more intense the longing for self-determination. Fairness . Consider your need to be treated by the same standard as anyone else. If you don’t feel cheated right now, you likely do not feel life is unfair. But as soon as you feel you are being treated more negatively than others, your emotions warn you with growing intensity. Acceptance . Consider your need to be affirmed for who you authentically are. If you’re totally embraced for who you honestly are, you may not even feel the need for acceptance. But as soon as you feel a threat of rejection, your longing for acceptance can naturally intensify. Grieving . Consider your need to adjust to some painful loss. If you have not suffered any terrible loss recently, you likely feel no urgency to make any emotional adjustments. But if you recently lost something of great importance to you, you will intensely feel Intimacy . Consider your need for affectionate closeness. If already close to someone in a satisfying relationship, you don’t exactly long for intimacy at that moment. But if unable to find a compatible romantic partner, you may be craving for intimacy. Security . Consider your need to remain unhindered by dangers. If feeling totally safe at the moment, you likely don’t even think about your need for security. But as soon as dangers come rushing in, your need for security rushes front and center. Support . Consider your need to receive help where you cannot provide for yourself. If surrounded by friends pouring out bountiful care, you don’t feel the need for support that intensely. But if in trouble somewhere all by yourself, you yearn for all the help you can get. With each of these, the more your feelings warn you that you must resolve the need as soon as possible, it often includes something that could hold hope of prompt relief. Often, this serves as stopgap measure, at least until the real thing comes along. Unfortunately, we can become attached to such substitutes. Until a need fully resolves, your mind keeps you focused on it at some level. The less you can resolve a need on your own, and especially if vulnerable to forces beyond your personal control, you could find yourself trapped in emotional pain warning of persisting unmet needs. Need-response Need-response identifies four levels of human problems that can leave you feeling stuck in emotionalpain. Personal problem . You can solve a personal problem on your own. The painful feelings subside soon after you pursue your solution. Interpersonal problem . You solve an interpersonal problem with cooperation with a peer. The closer you agree on a solution, the sooner your painful feelings can fade away. Power problem . You must wait on someone of influence to solve the problem. If they respond to your need, your painful feelings can then stop bothering you. Structural problem . A social norm or structural pattern must change before you can solve such a problem. Until then, you could feel trapped in some intensifying emotional pain. Need-response exists to address each level of problem. The more your problem sits higher above this list, the more likely you endure some sharp disturbing feelings. Long-term endurance of such emotional pain correlates with coping mechanisms like addictions. Too many of us must find ways to accommodate increasingly loads of emotional pain from mounting loads of unresolved needs, due to these complex problems. Need-response prepares you to address all of these levels of problems so that all sides can benefit by resolving more needs. Reactive Problem Hyper-individualism presents a major hurdle to identifying the level of a problem prompting your intense emotions. The Western bias toward personal responsibility—which is laudable when properly applied—easily blinds us from these higher levels of human problems. We too easily blame ourselves for what we cannot personally change. Instead of entertaining the complexities of our problems, we cope with relief-generalizing that avoids dealing with the problem. Instead of engaging the intense feelings that follow, we gloss over the details that could solve the problem. Instead of solving problems, we feed the deeper nefarious problem of avoidant adversarialism . We avoid facing the uncomfortable reality of our complicated problems by becoming adversarial. Since it’s easier to change a powerless individual than change the more powerful person or institution, we habitually evade the intense feelings produced by such problems by rushing into conflicts. To avoid dealing squarely with complicated issues, we indulgently take sides in these contrived conflicts. In short, we try to take the easier path but that quickly becomes the harder path the bear. Your intense feelings are not the problem as much as the unresolved needs they exist to report . Responsive Solution Need-response has you embrace each challenging feeling. You develop the tenacity to embrace even your most painful emotions. You get to the need each of these intense feelings try to report. You then address each problem up the ladder. You resolve your personal problems the best you can. But offered understanding that even your personal problems may require some attention to these higher-level problems. Even those in positions of influential power have many of the same needs as you. So need-response cultivates mutual supports. That includes offering them many of the same qualities that you need . For example, you offer them grace that affirms where they are developmentally at to model the standard for how they are to graciously affirm you where you are at. You learn to let your painful feelings serve you, so you don’t feel trapped serving them . You learn to turn your most intense feelings into opportunities for growth. You learn to appreciate these intense feelings as they inform you the status of your many needs. Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: When overwhelmed with intense pain, what do you have to help me to think straight? This seems easier said then done, so I’d like to see such pain endurance in action. Personal responsibility is the answer for most problems, or so I am personally convinced. What can be done about lingering pain that doesn’t seem connected to any current need? Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

  • honesty

    3 < Back to list A. Character refunction 3 A honesty Honesty , as used here, is sharing with others what you admittedly know to be true. Specifically, expressing to others about yourself only what you know to be true. And qualifying how well you know something to be true or untrue of yourself. 3 .1 A Need experience The flipside, of course, is dishonesty. Deception prevents one or both sides in an interaction to accurately identify and address the relevant needs. Worse, it can spur one to create trouble of avoidable needs . In an attempt to avoid pain of vulnerability , for example, it creates more pain later. Lying often avoids pain of facing what is true. Honesty serves as a social glue for holding social capital together. You interact with each as you authentically are. You make it possible or others to encounter your actual self, your reality, where you are honestly at. You can enhance your honest by avoiding language with multiple or dubious meaning. You discipline your expression to convey exactly what you intend, and check with the recipient’s feedback. How honest you are depends on the situation. Your level of self-exposure depends on how trustworthy the recipient shows to be with the information. You are not explicitly dishonest when withholding information from someone who could abuse with that self-revelation. As a social glue, honesty is earned. 3 .2 A Defunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction relationally lowers your ability to fully function. It is typically framed with more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 3 .3 A Refunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction could be turned around to raise your ability to function. It also uses more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 3 .4 A Example(s) This subsection offers some examples of this defunction you may observe affecting your life. Usually more than one example is provided. If reading this, there are no examples yet to this defunction. 3 .5 A Associated defunctions This subsection points to similar or applicable defunctions. If reading this, there are no defunctions specifically associated with this defunction. 3 .6 A Relevant refunctions This subsection points to relevant or complementary refunctions. If reading this, there are no relevant defunctions to correlate with this defunction. 3 .7 A Applicable principles This subsection points to those anankelogical principles that aptly apply to this defunction. If reading this, there are no anankelogical principles related specifically to this defunction. 3 .8 A Referenced blog posts This subsection points to those blog entries that relate to, or cite, this particular defunction. If reading this, there are no blog entries yet related specifically to this defunction. Date created: 8/26/23 Type: Date revised: A. Character refunction The more others hear and trust you to speak truthfully, the more your needs resolve. Say what you need to say without guile. Avoid manipulating others with words you know aren't true. Avoid putting yourself in a situation you feel you must deceive others. Nurture a reputation of being reliable in what you express. Be authentic. Hold others to a higher standard of being forthright with you. See how honesty resolves more needs in your life. Previous Next Discuss at our Engagement forum

  • 1x03 | AnankelogyFoundation

    < Back The Need-Response podcast 1x03 Where does it hurt? Do you settle for options that merely ease your pain? Why not let us help remove its cause? The video will appear here in a moment Video version of the full audio podcast Show notes Do you settle for options that merely ease your pain? Why not let us help remove its cause? The Need-Response podcast Anankelogy Foundation 00:00 / 42:03 Only need-response understands your pain can only exist from your unresolved needs. Only need-response exhausts all means to help you resolve those needs. Episode transcript PDF transcript for this episode Click on the button to view the full script of this episode Featured video clips These are the video clips featured in this episode. Click on the title to view it on YouTube. You also The video will appear here in a moment The video will appear here in a moment First video feature for this episode Second video feature for this episode Audiogram shorts View the snippets of this episode we posted online. Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Clip 4 Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 5 Clip 6 Clip 7 Clip 8 Summary update Check here for a brief update on the progress of the need-response service. 1x03 00:00 / 00:38 Engagement Where does it hurt? Public Engagement Interact with the content of this episode by leaving a comment at our YouTube channel. Engage 1st video feature Engage 1st video feature Engage full episode We are cultivating a love-inspired culture of how best to engage each other. If we reply to your comment, or read a comment we leave for someone else, observe our uniquely responsive approach. Member Engagement You can learn more about how we cultivate more of our potential to be more loving toward one another by engaging us, and each other, by becoming a member of the Need-Responder Community . You can start for free, as a Follower . Follow the development of the need-response serve. Give your input Become a Supporter to help shape this new service. Engage us personally. Become an invested Contributor to help co-create this new service. Become one of its first professionals. Explore your membership options More Engagement NRC Follower $0 $ 0 Follow developments of creating this service Valid until canceled Select Receive updates on this service’s progress We engage your feedback on its development Follow its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Follower? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum text We invite you, financially invested subscribers, to give us your feedback to this episode. And to discuss its content amongst yourselves. If you are a Follower, you can upgrade your subscription to join the discussion here . Already a Supporter? text Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum More Engagement NRC Supporter $5 $ 5 Every month Invest and co-create the need-response service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Support its development Choose one that works for you best More Engagement NRC Contributor $25 $ 25 Every month Take the lead in developing this much needed service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Test the need-response service Shape the need-response service Contribute to its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Contributor? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! text Discuss at Need-Response creation forum Next time In the next episode, we take you further into the journey of creating this pioneering service for you, with your helpful input. Previous episode Next episode

  • H | AnankelogyFoundation

    Glossary H hyper-individualism (n. ) - DEFUNCTION [not a neologism] The defunction that exists as "an extreme focus on personal autonomy, desires, and self-interest, to the point where it neglects or actively disregards the needs of the community, collective well-being, and shared responsibilities . It's an intensified version of individualism where people see themselves as isolated agents, responsible only for their own success, often leading to social disengagement, loneliness, and reduced civic participation." Key characteristics : Extreme self-reliance : Prioritizing personal goals above all, even when it harms the group. Disregard for society : Acting without regard for societal norms, rules, or the common good. Focus on "me" : A "me, me, me" mentality where individual satisfaction supersedes collective needs. Erosion of social bonds : Weakening community ties and shared responsibility, as seen in declining civic engagement and increased loneliness. Examples in action : Ignoring shared rules : Disregarding traffic laws like stop signs or running red lights. Environmental issues : Prioritizing personal consumption over collective sustainability efforts. Social interactions : A lack of basic courtesy or a sense of obligation to others in social settings. Contrast with healthy individualism : Healthy individualism : Encourages personal growth, self-mastery, and achieving potential, often benefiting society. Hyper-individualism : An excessive, detrimental form where self-interest harms the collective, creating a breakdown in social cohesion. [This definition comes from Google's Gemini AI ] A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

  • 1x06 | AnankelogyFoundation

    < Back The Need-Response podcast 1x06 What is wrong with us? If you can start for free, why not try it? Especially if you can shift the costs to the powerful. The video will appear here in a moment Video version of the full audio podcast Show notes If you can start for free, why not try it? Especially if you can shift the costs to the powerful. The Need-Response podcast Anankelogy Foundation 00:00 / 40:43 Episode transcript PDF transcript for this episode Click on the button to view the full script of this episode Featured video clips These are the video clips featured in this episode. Click on the title to view it on YouTube. You also The video will appear here in a moment The video will appear here in a moment First video feature for this episode Second video feature for this episode Audiogram shorts View the snippets of this episode we posted online. Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Clip 4 Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 5 Clip 6 Clip 7 Clip 8 Summary update Check here for a brief update on the progress of the need-response service. 1x06 00:00 / 00:38 Engagement What is wrong with us? Public Engagement Interact with the content of this episode by leaving a comment at our YouTube channel. Engage 1st video feature Engage 1st video feature Engage full episode We are cultivating a love-inspired culture of how best to engage each other. If we reply to your comment, or read a comment we leave for someone else, observe our uniquely responsive approach. Member Engagement You can learn more about how we cultivate more of our potential to be more loving toward one another by engaging us, and each other, by becoming a member of the Need-Responder Community . You can start for free, as a Follower . Follow the development of the need-response serve. Give your input Become a Supporter to help shape this new service. Engage us personally. Become an invested Contributor to help co-create this new service. Become one of its first professionals. Explore your membership options More Engagement NRC Follower $0 $ 0 Follow developments of creating this service Valid until canceled Select Receive updates on this service’s progress We engage your feedback on its development Follow its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Follower? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum text We invite you, financially invested subscribers, to give us your feedback to this episode. And to discuss its content amongst yourselves. If you are a Follower, you can upgrade your subscription to join the discussion here . Already a Supporter? text Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum More Engagement NRC Supporter $5 $ 5 Every month Invest and co-create the need-response service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Support its development Choose one that works for you best More Engagement NRC Contributor $25 $ 25 Every month Take the lead in developing this much needed service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Test the need-response service Shape the need-response service Contribute to its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Contributor? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! text Discuss at Need-Response creation forum Next time In the next episode, we take you further into the journey of creating this pioneering service for you, with your helpful input. Previous episode Next episode

  • Williams | AnankelogyFoundation

    The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Sabrina Williams TX Sabrina Williams Estimated innocence score: 81 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated coerced into plea deal by threats to take her kids away Highlights of this wrongful conviction - ex related to CPS official - previous wrongful conviction - witness lied to save self - threatened with life sentence Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? major factor central factor major factor central factor not a factor minor factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 7 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in TX of: child endangerment Wrongly convicted on February 20, 1998 Sentence: 12–15 years Custody status: probation Dive deeper into Sabrina's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Sabrina's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Sabrina's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Sabrina's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Sabrina Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 1 Likely innocent 21 Clearly innocent 33 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Sabrina Williams Follow my Public Exoneration campaign. Consider becoming an active supporter for as little as $4.99 per week. Invest in restoring claimant’s freedom. Invest in yourself. Proxy for innocence claimant: Carlos Ruiz Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Sabrina The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating her. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Sabrina The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating her. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Sabrina If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >

  • 1x02 | AnankelogyFoundation

    < Back The Need-Response podcast 1x02 What do you need? Do we really need another type of professional service? The video will appear here in a moment Video version of the full audio podcast Show notes Do we really need another type of professional service? 00:00 / 39:53 Episode transcript PDF transcript for this episode Click on the button to view the full script of this episode Featured video clips These are the video clips featured in this episode. Click on the title to view it on YouTube. You also The video will appear here in a moment The video will appear here in a moment First video feature for this episode Second video feature for this episode Audiogram shorts View the snippets of this episode we posted online. Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 1 Clip 2 Clip 3 Clip 4 Audiogram one will appear here shortly Audiogram two will appear here shortly Audiogram three will appear here shortly Audiogram four will appear here shortly Clip 5 Clip 6 Clip 7 Clip 8 Summary update Check here for a brief update on the progress of the need-response service. 1x02 00:00 / 00:38 Engagement What do you need? Public Engagement Interact with the content of this episode by leaving a comment at our YouTube channel. Engage 1st video feature Engage 1st video feature Engage full episode We are cultivating a love-inspired culture of how best to engage each other. If we reply to your comment, or read a comment we leave for someone else, observe our uniquely responsive approach. Member Engagement You can learn more about how we cultivate more of our potential to be more loving toward one another by engaging us, and each other, by becoming a member of the Need-Responder Community . You can start for free, as a Follower . Follow the development of the need-response serve. Give your input Become a Supporter to help shape this new service. Engage us personally. Become an invested Contributor to help co-create this new service. Become one of its first professionals. Explore your membership options More Engagement NRC Follower $0 $ 0 Follow developments of creating this service Valid until canceled Select Receive updates on this service’s progress We engage your feedback on its development Follow its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Follower? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum text We invite you, financially invested subscribers, to give us your feedback to this episode. And to discuss its content amongst yourselves. If you are a Follower, you can upgrade your subscription to join the discussion here . Already a Supporter? text Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! Discuss at Need-Response creation forum More Engagement NRC Supporter $5 $ 5 Every month Invest and co-create the need-response service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Support its development Choose one that works for you best More Engagement NRC Contributor $25 $ 25 Every month Take the lead in developing this much needed service Valid until canceled 7 day free trial Select Receive updates on service’s progress Engage your feedback on its development Apply your ideas to the service Vote on decisions shaping service Test the need-response service Shape the need-response service Contribute to its development Choose one that works for you best Already a Contributor? Follower? Upgrade to join the discussion! text Discuss at Need-Response creation forum Next time In the next episode, we take you further into the journey of creating this pioneering service for you, with your helpful input. Previous episode Next episode

If not, then try another search phrase. It must be in here somewhere!

bottom of page