Support Us to Support You The Anankelogy Foundation offers revolutionary programs for below cost. The first one is provided free of charge. These programs equip program participants to serve as certified need-responders . But only if we can continue to afford to do so until this grows into a self-sustaining enterprise. Help us offset the costs with a generous gift. Help us spread the love of respecting the needs of others as we would have them respect our own. The founder, Steph Turner, personally invites you to give a gift that can help get this vision off the ground. Thank you. If this space remains blank after about five seconds, then please reload this page in your browser . Some of our financial needs: Website ($600 annually) Full email marketing service ($50 per month) Repair or replace my computer (sound output not working) Podcast quality microphone ($50 to $200 range) Internet service ($60 per month) Virtual office rental ($4 per month) Legal fees for filing nonprofit status ($600 to file in Michigan) and more! Financial constraints Steph Turner struggles to lay the foundation for this service while being underemployed, economically exploited, and financially overcommitted. Underemployed After being wrongly convicted in 1993 , I was never able to get a good paying job. Employers can legally discriminate against me, despite my viable claim of innocence . I now work at a factory that hires ex-felons, at basement level wages. This puts me in something of a catch-22. I am trying to create a service to address this problem, but I first must solve the problem to be able to start the service. Your gift could help me find a way out if this conundrum. Economically exploited The wrongful conviction denies my many rights you can take for granted. That injustice kept me from finishing my master’s degree in counseling in 2015 . Now my wages are to be garnished by a state collection bureau. I am currently challenging this action with the need-response alternative. This alternative promises to respond to each other's needs far better than any legal resource option. With your gift, I may be able to cut through these catch-22s. Overcommitted When testing this new service, I tried demonstrating the benefit of being more responsive to each other. I offered to do simple favors for others. I fell trap to cosigning a loan, which seemed like a solid decision at the time. That person defaulted, and I'm left with the fall-out. Surprisingly, I feel spiritually at peace about it. I should be upset. But instead, I am drawn to trust Power beyond my meager understanding. Your gift may bring that illuminating epiphany. Thank you for your support I am humbled by my need to ask for financial support. I am excited to turn your support into a viable serve that can support your underserved needs. One generous act of love at a time. Thank you!

React Culture React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs . react culture - privileged reactions Privileged reaction # 5 Oppo culture Caustic adversarialism trapping us in mutual defensiveness. properly resolving needs Oppo culture 8/3/26 1 Oppo culture When progressives oppose conservatives for being visibly insensitive to those experiencing intersectionality (i.e., how overlapping forms of discrimination typically has multiplying effects), reacting to a group that functions best when self-motivated and not shamed into compliance fails to sustainably help the marginalized. When conservatives oppose intersectionality as mere slogan, reacting to those championing the intersectionally marginalized fails to demonstrate the conservative value for personal freedom or self-initiative. Opposing what your foe needs does not extinguish a conflict but enflames it . Opposing another’s inflexible needs predictably and needlessly triggers their defensiveness. Which leads to more problems than respecting their affected needs. No matter how privileged by widely accepted norms, no one can change what their life requires to keep functioning. Short for "opposition culture", oppo culture refers to the set of written and unwritten norms that privileges or compels one to take an antagonistic stance against others with whom one disagrees. Often to the point of opposing what they cannot change: their needs. Defunction: adversarialism norms Oppo culture privileges instantly opposing others in objectifying ways. Disagreement turns into harsh hostilities. This set of adversarial norms privilege provoking defensiveness, instead of asking questions out of genuine curiosity. Any potential for mutual regard gets immediately tossed aside. Resistance from the provoked “proves” how evil they are. Little to no reflection can be afforded to recognize one’s own fault in the matter. And human potential for empathy, understanding and love gets summarily quashed. These social norms normalize adversarialism. As explained by sociologist Gordon Fellman in his book Rambo and the Dalai Lama , adversarialism is opposing others largely for the sake of opposition. To overcome others, to win over others for some personal or team gain. Anankelogy recognizes this privileged reaction as “indulgent side-taking ”. Typically to pacify some discomfort, this rush to a take side typically includes these eight features. Overemphasizes each other's differences while disregarding common ground. Relies on impersonal arguments to avoid engaging relevant specifics. Resists addressing or resolving needs when easing discomfort of those needs. Opposes the other side’s inflexible needs that they cannot change, called moral conflation (i.e., conflates inflexible needs to flexible responses to them). Misapplies critique of moral relativism and moral neutrality . Dismisses good faith efforts to understand all sides as bothsidesism or false balance . All natural needs affected by a conflict exist equally . Provokes the opposed side’s defensiveness to produce more of what is opposed . Self-righteously and arrogantly serves own conflict porn to win at the expense of others. These widely privileged reactions pull many into perpetual conflict. Getting defensive triggersthe other’s defenses, effectively capturing both sides in mutual defensiveness. Each dig in their heels and stay guarded instead of meaningfully resolving the conflict. Examples: Politics tend to be rich with examples of privileged adversarial reactions. Wokeism . Opposing “woke ” without defining the term or showing empathy toward those who find hope in raising awareness of suffered social inequalities, many who readily admit that it gravitated into a petty “wokeism” that turned excessive, but not that continuing social injustices are okay. After all, is not the opposite of woke is to stick your head in the sand and let some marketing genius convince you of his attractive lies? Capitalism . Denouncing capitalism as a monolithic economic system without recognizing how nimble business ownership incentivized enough productivity to lift many out of the tyranny of abject poverty, or recognizing those business owners who admit some faults within capitalism. DEI . Opposing Diversity Equality Inclusion initiatives without addressing ongoing forms of systemic discrimination against marginalized groups risks igniting a backlash. Any excessive pro-DEI policy can be addressed and adjusted where necessary, without unraveling what marginalized people’s inflexibly need for their lives. In the long run, it does not serve the interests of conservatives if sparking a return to privileged prejudice and legalized discrimination for what no one can change. Russiagate . Russians did interfere with the 2016 election and Trump did vocally welcome it . Trump’s abrasive style smashed the Overton window on many fronts. From using Gish gallop to flooding the zone , he practically incited the Democrats to push back. On the surface, Democratic resistance appeared to blame Trump’s victory over Hillary on Russian collusion. The deeper story—passed over by both legacy and independent media—was how to return to a more civil politics. The Russian collusion narrative appeared to me as mere cope. Now we tolerate a race to the bottom, which furthers public disillusionment with the political process. If violence erupts, Trump appears ready to misuse the Insurrection Act to hold onto power. At its core, “Russiagate” was never actually about Russian collusion but about guarding democracy from a charismatic demagogue. The narrative distraction now seems to be working in Trump’s favor. Terrorism . One side’s resistance fighter is another side’s terrorist. Resistance fighters can win sympathy for their cause, but not so much if painted as terrorists. If we’re honest, almost all wars end up targeting noncombatants. George Washinton supported terrorizing and ethnic cleansing the Haudenosaunee for siding with the British amidst the Revolutionary War. The label is loaded language to coerce public perception away from the disadvantaged fighter’s cause. Any form of asymmetric warfare—guerillas, insurgents, rebels, militants—is easier to paint as the bad guys when having the resources to control the narrative. Meanwhile, keeping the war going by ignoring the underlying needs tends to be good for business for arms dealers, geopolitical actors and other benefiting stakeholders. Zionism . Supporting Holocaust survivors and their offspring to have a land of their own washes over the colonialist methods used to serve that end. The colonialism that early Zionists learned from their European oppressors has no place among Arabs already living in the lands around Jerusalem. Now their vehement resistance gets used against them, while their more diplomatic attempts get mostly ignored. Both Israeli Jews and the Palestinians have an inflexible need for security and for sovereignty, along with other needs that neither side can adjust for the other. Provoking each side’s defenses serves warmongers more than each side’s need for peace. There can be no peace until such objectively existing needs get properly respected. All else is commentary. Refunction: responsive mutuality process Atomization culture Accountability diffusion Degraded social contract Indulgent side-taking Pathological pragmatism Projected antagonism Structural exaction Hyperrationality culture Ascribed legitimacy Dysfunction pathway Manipulative deception Permitted evil Pseudo-rationality Zero-sum thinking Hyperbole culture Bothsidesism misuse Excessive resourcing Mass institution mission creep Petty arguing debate Relativizing universal wisdom Avoidance culture Coerced compliance Gaslighting Moral conflation Premature defensiveness Self-incriminating denials Oppo culture Coerced poor options dependence Humanity loathing Normative alienation Privileged avoidance Shame shifting

This is for any wrongly convicted innocent underserved by the adversarial judicial system. When even innocence litigators cannot find merit in your innocence claim, now you can use this form to demonstrate the merits of your overlooked case. If litigators still resist, we move onto Responsive Innocence. About Introducing Anankelogy the book: You NEED This Anankelogy Principles Glossary Politically Homeless Optimal Politics OP Interest Need-response Need-responders Community Engagement Book Online Groups Development PH Estimated Innocence Form Still processing paper forms from countless pleas for help? Let us presort the claims for you You can then instantly know how to best serve each claimant. fresh approach - download Download the EIF Organization (acronym) First name Last name Email I accept terms & conditions I want to learn how to utilize this tool. I am open to receiving info about alternatives to the adversarial legal system. Download this free interactive tool Innocence claimants count on your as their last line of hope. But you receive more requests for legal assistance than you can accommodate. Need-response can smooth the process with this Estimated Innocence Form. Encourage innocence claimants to preprocess their claim with this interactive spreadsheet. This form automatically compares their claim with those already exonerated. Then calculates the degree that their claim of innocence can merit your attention. Innocence claimant? Click here to go to the page that's just for you. Sort claims by their quality. Instantly recognize the strength of each claim of actual innocence. Get a readout of how the innocence claim mirrors other exonerated cases. Process innocence claims more effectively and efficiently. Instantly recognize which claims you can properly serve. Promptly refer out those you cannot, based on presorted criteria. Get a jumpstart with each claim. Empower claimants and their supporters to do some of the investigative legwork. Boost the reputation of the legal profession by no longer keeping claimants in the dark. Avoid traumatizing claimants by not having to make them wait and be told you cannot serve their claim. Quickly identify where to improve your resources to process all these viable claims. Quickly identify your need to hire more staff. Use this data and its standardized narratives to attract more funding. Invite the claimant, or their supporter, to send you the summary Estimated Innocence Report. Check out a sample of the completed form. Send a paper form to an incarcerated claimant you represent. Download the form today to see what this estimated innocence can do for your processing of innocence claims. EIF-sample pages 01 EIF-sample pages 02 EIF-sample pages 03 EIF-sample pages 01 1/4 We appreciate how You routinely receive more requests than you can promptly process. Criminal courts routinely deny their own errors and typically are not incentivized to take responsibility for their costly mistakes. It takes the adversarial legal process a long time to review each case, forcing your clients to wait years to maybe find justice. When the claimant exhausts all legal options... Now t hey have an alternative to the slow, unresponsive legal process: Responsive Innocence . The EIF exists to serve at least a dozen aims. Consider how it can help you identify the immense scope of wrongful convictions. And then use this data to attract funders to expand your resources to process such viable claims. Join us in rapidly identifying and responding to viable innocence claims. EIF aim 01 EIF aim 02 EIF aim 12 EIF aim 01 1/12 Need-response regards all wrongly convicted innocents overlooked by the adversarial legal process as "unexonerated". The EIF could publicize their unexonerated cases. And draw attention to improve resources to clear these mounting viable claims. Join us in exploring more responsive ways to free the innocent. NOTE: This was orginally available on the ValueRelating.com website. That site will soon be phased out. If you previously downloaded the EIF there, find more support for it here. This continues to be a work in progress. Your constructive feedback to help improve it is appreciated. If you have a suggestion or a question, click here . One last thing... Any injustice in the name of justice is no justice at all . Currently requires MS Excel or reader to utilize. After you download the spreadsheet, it will open in PROTECTED VIEW. Click on Enable Editing to start using it. The form will not work until you do. Ready to download it now? Download the "estimated innocence form" interactive tool By using this tool, you agree with our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . If these terms and this policy do not fit your need, you are not to use this tool. We welcome you to contact us to suggest how we can fit these to your particular needs.

Innocence Index Each listed person here was wrongly convicted of a crime for which they demonstrate that they had no role. Go to Innocence Profiles Case status: "public" or "state" We classify each innocence claim as either 'public' or 'state'. Each "state" case has been picked up by the DA office of that case's jurisdiction. Each "public" case remains in the domain of public discretion to either properly respect the identified innocent or to slip into complicity of "innocence offending ". "public" or "state" Case preview triage We invite the DA office to consider these cases of viable innocence. We presort the claims for their prompt review. Innocence index We invite the public to reaffirm the rights of these wrongly convicted innocent persons We replace any ' innocence offending ' with public support. Innocence Index: case preview triage The index will appear here in a moment If it doesn't, try reloading the page. What is "innocence offending"? Innocence offending is when anyone treats a wrongly convicted innocent person as if they are guilty, such as abridging their rights under color of law because of their false status as a 'felon'. An 'innocence offender ' refers to anyone who mistreats the wrongly convicted innocent person as if they are guilty. Learn more...

This is for any wrongly convicted innocent underserved by the adversarial judicial system. When the adversarial system cannot admit or correct its own repeated errors, we present a mutalizing alternative to serve overlooked needs for which the law exists to serve. About Introducing Anankelogy the book: You NEED This Anankelogy Principles Glossary Politically Homeless Optimal Politics OP Interest Need-response Need-responders Community Engagement Book Online Groups Development PH Responsive Innocence Wrongly convicted and disillusioned with the legalistic innocence movement ? Succeed where the law fails Let us take your compelling estimated innocence to the pioneering new level of public exoneration . fresh approach - download If you already downloaded and filled out the Estimated Innocence Form Try a fresh approach First name Last name Email Message (optional) I accept terms & conditions I want to learn how to use this tool. Download free interactive tool Download "responsive innocence" interactive tool Innocence projects take cases slipping through the cracks of the appellate process. But who takes cases slipping through the cracks in the innocence movement stuck on adversarial law? Need-response does. First, we demonstrate the viability of your innocence claim, for yourself or for your wrongly convicted loved one. This form automatically compares your claim with those already exonerated. Then calculates the degree which your claim merits attention by those who can support you. Phase Two of Exoneration Services The Estimated Innocence Form supports a legal claim of actual innocence . You can use it to help innocence litigants quickly spot where in your case to get you or your loved one back into court. But what if that proves insufficient? What recourse do you have if the adversarial system keeps refusing to hear your case? What if you need more than this... Estimated Innocence Form for innocence litigators For the neglected innocent Innocence litigators and activists know they face an uphill battle when working within the adversarial system. They recognize the chances remain slip to clear all wrongly convicted innocents. Do we enable the unresponsive adversarial system when not challenging it with a more responsive alternative? from here or from Value Relating , this next interactive form provides you an alternative to the unresponsive adversarial judicial process. You learn how to challenge the built-in limits of their legalistic adversarial approach with a more engaging mutuality approach toward full exoneration. From challenge to opportunity Despite my own compelling innocence claim, I've been repeatedly underserved by the adversarial judicial process. Instead of giving up in utter disappointment or disillusionment, I'm offering the failing judicial system a more responsive way. I'm showing them how need-response can reduce violence and crime by resolving more needs. Their antagonistic approach can accomplish only so much. When the adversarial judicial process fails to recognize and correct its many mistakes, it's time to consider a less antagonistic alternative. It's time to consider a viable alternative. It's time to replace their unresponsive adversarial approach with a much more responsive mutuality approach. Need-response challenges the unresponsiveness of the adversarial process with a more responsive mutual process. Instead of opposing each other for only one side to win, need-response counters with a win-win option to respect the affected needs on all sides of a conflict. Who would oppose that? Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p01 Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p02 Your current options Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p14 Impactors list (4 of 4) Responsive Exoneration 1st tab - p01 1/14 From unresponsive to responsive wellness initiative If your EIR shows you have a strong or even a good claim for actual innocence, and the adversarial judicial process persists in denying your case, a wellness campaign can introduce all those involved to our more responsive alternative. A wellness campaign addresses the many underserved needs overlooked by the adversarial judicial process. A wellness campaign shifts focus from what serves the winner in a court battle to what resolves the unchosen needs on all sides of a conflict. In five phases, the campaign attracts support for your innocence by challenging the limits of the adversarial approach. It negates reluctance to address needs by addressing each other's affected needs. Be skeptical before you try This alternative works best for those giving up hope on the adversarial judicial process. This new approach may not work for you if there's still hope for a favorable adjudicated outcome. Before you try this alternative approach... Follow one in progress This alternative continues to evolve. It's founder is currently applying it to their own case. You can see for yourself how it works for them. Follow Steph's wellness campaign EIF aim 01 EIF aim 02 EIF aim 12 EIF aim 01 1/12 Help make some history Your input could help to improve this. Let's learn together how to incentivize these powerholders to improve their responsiveness to these opportunities. Let's support their career to create just outcomes by exonerating those the adversarial system fails. One responsive innocent at a time. Any injustice in the name of justice is no justice at all . Currently requires MS Excel or reader to utilize. After you download the spreadsheet, it will open in PROTECTED VIEW. Click on Enable Editing to start using it. The form will not work until you do. Ready to try a new way? Download "responsive innocence" interactive tool By using this tool, you agree with our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . If these terms and this policy do not fit your need, you are not to use this tool. We welcome you to contact us to suggest how we can fit these to your particular needs.

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Glossary W < back to glossary menu weak power (n. ) The type of social influnce that leads to unresolved needs, compromised wellbeing and emotional pain. Contrasts with strong power , of influence resulting in resolved needs and improved outcomes. See power types . Also see coerced poor options dependence (CoPOD), symfunction capture , and systemic exaction . wellness campaign (n. ) [wellness campaign terminology] A specialized service offered by need-response that focuses on resolving the client's identified wellness need(s) while respecting the identified needs of others. Instead of trying to relieve pain, a wellness campaign aims to resolve needs to remove cause for pain, and reach more potential. Unlike private healthcare of psychotherapy, the client makes public their wellness goal and invites others to support it. Instead of seeking to change the individual to adjust to life as it is, a wellness campaign seeks to change relationship dynamics to be more responsive to each other's needs. This includes incentivizing the socially powerful to demonstrably be more responsive to the vulnerable needs of those they impact. Unlike legal approaches by attorneys and political activists, the intent is not to win at another's expense but to raise everyone's functioning level. Instead of conformity to interpreted laws, a wellness campaign incentivizes all involved to go beyond minimal legal requirements to resolve the needs laws exist to serve. This includes incentivizing authority figures to rely less on impersonal laws and more on earning legitimacy by enabling us all to resolve our needs. A wellness campaign goes through four to five phases, each meant to address one of the four levels of human problems . The campaign typically concludes at the end of the final phase with the client reaching their wellness goal. Some campaigns can transition into other campaign types. Three types of wellness campaigns currently exist; 1) case campaign to address the client's wellness need; 2) project campaign to address wellness needs of those similarly situated; and 3) movement campaign as a coalition of project campaigns. wellness impedence (n. & v. ) DEFUNCTION Akin to “obstruction of justice”, the hindrance of any good faith effort to mutually understand, address and properly resolve the inflexible needs of all identified. Applies primarily to powerholders approached to respect the impacted needs of those vulnerable to their social influence. (NRA element) wellness offender (n. ) [wellness campaign terminology] Anyone interfering or resisting the resolution of identified needs after provided ample opportunity to report any impact on their own needs. See resolution path . See anti-wellness . wellness optimization (n. ) REFUNCTION Pursuing peakfunction by identifying and addressing all relevant underserved needs, toward properly resolving each one wellness paradox (n. ) REFUNCTION The apparent contradiction that improved functioning requires something profoundly wise that at first seems unwise, or at least challenges conventional norms and widely adopted beliefs. Examples: Personal responsibility depends upon social responsibility from others; social responsibility depends upon the personal responsibility of us all. The best rational understanding integrates the emotional prioritization of needs defying rationality. “If facts don’t care about feelings, then our need-prioritizing feelings don’t care about our rational facts.” Effective generalizing starts on the foundation of relevant specifics. Pain can only be fully removed by first embracing it and letting it report the threat to be removed. Merely relieving pain typically invites more pain. The best way to oppose another’s actions is to first accept their inflexible needs prompting such questionable actions. Consider Kohlberg’s levels of moral development , and the results of prioritizing postconventional morality of properly resolving each other’s inflexible needs over conventional morality of external ethics. This can counter wisdom resistant conventionality below. wellness resistance (n. ) DEFUNCTION Acclimating to norms of less-than-optimal resources, of normalizing unresolved needs and coping with the resulting emotional pain. This may include gravitating toward dependence of less-than-optimal options to the neglect of seeking optimal resources (i.e. primary resources ). See CoPOD (coereced poor options dependence) and symfunction capture . In contrast with wellness impedence applied mainly to powerholders, wellness resistance describes the actions of the relatively powerless, who remain vulnerable to the social influence of powerholders in power differentials. wellness resistant conventionality (n. ) DEFUNCTION The limitation imposed on full functioning of human life by remaining attached to widely accepted views that are easier to understand and mutually supported. Often reinforced by social norms that prioritizes symfunctionality over peakfunctional potential. See drift . Examples: Everyone must take personal responsibility for their choices and actions (without attention to the real limitations of options for those choices) and stop blaming the “system” for their personal problems (which can prompt false guilt, anxiety and depression from not being able to overcome external limitations). We are rational thinkers who must assert reason over our emotions (which generalizes all emotionsas irrational instead of intensified when needs go unmet) and seek to control nature with our minds by reducing our choices to cognitive processes in which we have control (which knowingly ignores all that exists outside of human control). You must not overthink matters too much and accept explanations that can ease our dissonance without too much trouble (which tends to solidify into overgeneralizations that overlook relevant specifics shaping our lives). Pain is bad and best avoided (which typically leaves in place the threat such pain reports, ensuring less functionality and more pain as your body insists you remove that threat) and everyone ‘s right to privacy is more important than communal values (which pulls us all into isolation and disabling alienation). We must oppose those who are wrong because those who don’t take a stand on political issues will fall for anything (which neglects the distinction between inflexible needs and flexible responses to those needs, then perpetuates conflict as each side must dig in their heals to guard the inflexible needs and inflexible priorities they cannot change). Consider Kohlberg’s levels of moral development , and recognize the impact from a culture of prioritizing conventional morality anchored in external ethics over postconventional morality committed to properly resolving each other’s inflexible needs. This exists contrary to wisdom paradox above. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z < back to glossary menu

7 < Back to list A. Character refunction 7 A forgiveness Forgiveness is here defined as letting go of anger toward another who acted toward you, or to others you care about, in ways you found objectionable. What you rejected you no longer reject as intensely. This includes releasing anger toward yourself, to release your own sense of shame. 7 .1 A Need experience Others wrong you when doing something you perceive as (and may well be) a threat to you. Social norms grant you various forms of retribution, from mildly embarrassing the offender to charging the offender with a felony leading to a death penalty. Threatening them in return offers some relief from your pain. But rightful retribution seldom resolves needs, and can provoke avoidable needs . Releasing your anger frees you to focus on more important matters. Easing your rejection of the person can segue to specifically rejecting their challenged actions. Then segue further to rejecting the conditions behind the offense while affirming the identified offender. You create a clean slate to hopefully make it easier to address the relevant needs more responsibly. By forgiving the offender, you consider the needs of the other person, and target your rejection to how their unresolved needs painfully impacted you. You cease linking the painful action of the other as essentially the same as that other person. You refuse to let any hatred get a foothold in your attitude toward life. You inspire the offender to be honest and humble , to be more prosocial. You prioritize resolving all the needs involved. 7 .2 A Defunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction relationally lowers your ability to fully function. It is typically framed with more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 7 .3 A Refunctionalizing Info This subsection applies 'relational knowing' statements to illuminate how this defunction could be turned around to raise your ability to function. It also uses more/more or more/less or less/more or less/less associations that can be empirically tested. 7 .4 A Example(s) This subsection offers some examples of this defunction you may observe affecting your life. Usually more than one example is provided. If reading this, there are no examples yet to this defunction. 7 .5 A Associated defunctions This subsection points to similar or applicable defunctions. If reading this, there are no defunctions specifically associated with this defunction. 7 .6 A Relevant refunctions This subsection points to relevant or complementary refunctions. If reading this, there are no relevant defunctions to correlate with this defunction. 7 .7 A Applicable principles This subsection points to those anankelogical principles that aptly apply to this defunction. If reading this, there are no anankelogical principles related specifically to this defunction. 7 .8 A Referenced blog posts This subsection points to those blog entries that relate to, or cite, this particular defunction. If reading this, there are no blog entries yet related specifically to this defunction. Date created: 8/29/23 Type: Date revised: A. Character refunction The more you let go of your anger toward those who wronged you, the more your needs resolve. Let go of your anger when wronged. Release yourself from your own self-chastisement. View any infringement of your rights as a mistake they can freely admit. Give others the space to honestly admit their imperfections. Rebuild trust by acknowledging your errors toward others. See how forgiveness resolves more needs. Previous Next Discuss at our Engagement forum

The Unexonerated: innocence profile < Back Peter Simpson NY Peter Simpson Estimated innocence score: 75 % Likely innocent when compared to cases already exonerated witness lied to protect the actual perpetrator Highlights of this wrongful conviction - burn patterns were junk science - witness testimony debunked by evidence - key witness lied to police - investigators ignored true motive Key contributing factors to this wrongful conviction not a factor - minor factor - major factor - central factor 1. Witness misidentification? 2. False confession? 3. Official misconduct? 4. Junk science? 5. Jail informant? 6. Inadequate defense? not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor not a factor Other contributing factors How many other of 58 factors? 6 EIF version: E1.1 Click here to view more information at a separate website Click here for documentation to verify this innocence claim Wrongly convicted in NY of: arson Wrongly convicted on March 3, 2006 Sentence: 15–30 years Custody status: transitional housing Dive deeper into Peter's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Peter's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Peter's compelling innocence Dive deeper into Peter's compelling innocence Here is where the claimant admits the weak spots in their case. This is the "flip side" to their narrative. They put it out there to show they have nothing to hide. They proactively cultivate trust by being transparent. Nobody's perfect Synopsis This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will have a couple of sentences here that summarizes this compelling case of innocence. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. This serves as a placeholder profile. An actual profile will present here in about 2000 characters the story how this wrongful conviction happened. It vies context this compelling case of overlooked innocence. And can suggest what is wrong with our current adversarial legal process to repeatedly neglect this miscarriage of justice. Summary Accuser's needs Other's needs See claimant's full Estimated Innocence Report Post-Conviction Journey Appeal results Every exonerated person had their case first reviewed by the judicial appeals process. Every time, the panel of judges overlooked the injustice of that miscarriage justice. The appellate process focuses on procedural standards. Is it possible to faithfully follow every procedural norm and still find an innocent person guilty? Yet, this happens much more frequently than many would like to admit. Most innocence projects remain under-resourced. Only a handful of lawyers, and often only law students or paralegals, invest hours going through case documents. They don't always find something that can be reversed in court. They tend to seek something they can trust will have a greater chance of being granted a hearing in court. And has a greater chance for success of a conviction reversal. They could risk their funding streams if championing cases with a harder, or little, chance to prevail in court. So they tend to serve those "low hanging fruit" cases of greater promise for overturning a wrongful conviction. Where does this leave the countless souls who are innocent in prison and beyond, who cannot get an innocence litigator to go to bat for them? That's what this Public Exoneration option is for. Innocence Movement Results Add your name to the petition to support exonerating Peter Innocence support petition What do you think about this claim of innocence? First, select the innocence claimant "With what I know of the case, I think the claimant is...* First name* Last name* Email* Submit Your first name Your last name Email Based on what I know, I think the claimant is... Submit Thank you for your support. If we get enough supporters, we may launch our own Public Exoneration campaign. Learn more below. tally count Latest tally of feedback to this innocence claim. Clearly guilty 0 Likely guilty 0 Likely innocent 0 Clearly innocent 0 Appellate Process Presents mission creep of prioritizing its institutional needs over the needs of the public. Innocence Project Replicates this mission creep when working exclusively within the adversarial legal process. Public Exoneration Corrects this mission creep by prioritizing needs over institutionalized adversarial legalism. After the adversarial options repeatedly fail, the new professional service of need-response counters with a mutual process that responsibly addresses each other's needs. When hate keeps failing to produce desired outcomes, it's time to try the power of love . Learn more "I am exploring the option to build up a campaign that takes my pursuit for overdue exoneration to the court of public opinion." of Peter Simpson I am considering a Public Exoneration campaign. Perhaps my proxy and I will follow another campaign and see how it works out for them. Proxy for innocence claimant: Melissa Simpson Public Exoneration progress: 0 How you can help us free Peter The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. Overview PDI step 1 PDI step 2 PDI step 3 PDI step 1 Demonstrate your innocence Sets a foundation to display your innocence Introduction Preview the 12 questions Solve personal problems Download & complete worksheet Learn More... PDI step 2 Declare your innocence Publicly establishes your innocence Overview Verify addresses Upload finished worksheet We distribute it to key recipients Learn More... PDI step 3 Follow up Expand awareness of your innocence Engaging responsive authorities Incentivizing authorities' responses More responsive or reactive Your final answers to the 12 questions Learn More... Overview Is this for you? Prove your innocence without lawyers Demonstrate your innocence Declare your innocence Follow up Learn More... Quickly show how you are a wrongly convicted innocent person by how you’re among the few who took your case to trial. Despite being found guilty, show how you consistently maintained innocence. In the face of certain parole denial, you faithfully stood your ground. This service works primarily for those who have already done their time. But now cannot get a meaningful job or find stable housing. All because of an undeserved felony record. For only a $49.48 one-time fee, establish your innocence with your own record of proven integrity. Let us inform the DA of your demonstrable innocence. We presort your claim of viable innocence for them. No lawyers involved. We incentivize the DA and others to recognize your demonstrated innocence. If they dare refuse, we are ready to appeal to the higher court of public opinion. Failure is not an option. Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link How you can help us free Peter The Public Exoneration campaign unfolds in five phases. We love for you to participate in this alternative approach to exonerating him. FIT BASE phase TEAM phase GROW phase GOAL phase BASE phase Set a firm foundation Sets a foundation to display your innocence Leverage your innocence Gain need-responsive skills Solve personal problems Invite peer supporters Learn More... Review your Estimated Innocence Report with your need-responder. Develop strategies to optimize its strengths and address any weaknesses. Together, you craft your dynamic “exoneration plan”. Learn to proactively endure discomforts, to resolve conflicts with authorities, to relate more integrally with reality, and more. Sharpen these skills to later incentivize unresponsive authorities. Get any personal problems out of the way. Improve yourself where you can. Remove any doubt that you are innocent of the conviction. Set the tone for your immanent exoneration. Invite friends and family who believe in your innocence. Learn to show them how they can back your efforts. And how they can attract more backers to support your case of compelling innocence. TEAM phase Build your support team Publicly establishes your innocence Onboard peer supporters to your team Practice your new skills Solve interpersonal problems Invite professional sponsors Learn More... Incentivize your followers to upgrade as supporters and contributors. Show them how they can personally benefit by becoming more centrally involved. Or at least by participating. Guide your contributors to develop the same need-responsive skills you recently sharpened. Invite your supporters to watch, to encourage them to develop these skills on their own. With these new skills, work on any interpersonal problems. Practice solving problems. Demonstrate your capacity to endure discomforts. Publicly validate your innocence. Introduce innocence lawyers and other innocence activists to this alternative to adversarial legalism. Invite then to sponsor your campaign to boost their legitimacy. Incentivize their involvement. GROW phase Engage innocence lawyers Expand awareness of your innocence Leverage your growing support Onboard professional sponsors Learn to solve power problems Practice speaking truth to power Learn More... Let your growing support network publicize your innocence, your testament to human endurance, your readiness to face conflict with respect for each other’s affected needs, and more. Demonstrate these skills to supportive professionals. Incentivize them to improve their responsiveness to neglected needs with such skills. Vouch for their improved responsiveness. Assess the responsiveness of professionals to your compelling case of innocence. Demonstrate how mutual regard for each other’s needs create s better results than legalistic adversarialism. Invite the most supportive professionals to practice these skills with you. Learn to speak the truth of your innocence in ways that authorities will openly listen. GOAL phase Engage the prosecutor Incentivize authorities to exonerate you Hold court of informed public opinion Replace cold adversarialism with love Effectively address structural problems Declare your avowed liberty Learn More... Give the courts every reason to process your innocence claim. Let them compete with the court of public opinion, as your team connects with media outlets to publicize your case. Upend the norms of the adversarial judicial process by demonstrating this more loving approach to solving conflicts. Let your loving character boldly exemplify your innocence. Unpack the imposing social norms that hinder just outcomes. Invite prosecutors, judges and policymakers to shift incentives. Publicly reward just outcomes over conviction rates. Declare your widely supported innocence before a candid world. Let your support network contest the legitimacy of any official resistance to exonerate you. Reward all who do the right thing. FIT Check if it’s a good fit This is a preliminary phase to prepare the way Self -assessment Invite supporters Get prepared Meet your service provider Learn More... Start by checking if this unique service is a good fit for you. Can the innocence claimant lead this effort themselves? Or should they delegate the leading role to another? Spread the costs early by inviting friends and family to back your wellness campaign. For free for them to merely follow. Or $4.99 per week for them to participate. Or $14.99 each week to get hem centrally involved. Get oriented to how this service operates. Connect with others exploring this alternative. Learn how this process takes a pioneering approach toward exoneration. Meet the professional need-responder. First through texting. Then in person online. No financial commitment for the first thirty days. I want to support Share this profile on social media to help spread the word. Thank you. Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Copy link Exonerating Peter If the public exoneration campaign has already begun, check here at your level of support. Please note that until you join their campaign, none of these will be accessible. Followers, Supporters & Contributors Follow developments of their exoneration campaign. Progress Updates Supporters & Contributors Join the forum actively supporting their exoneration campaign. Exoneration Forum Contributors only Oversee activities contributing to their ultimate exoneration. Executive Committee sample testimonials Tanya Simpson , Claimant's cousin I was skeptical at first. I mean, how can something outside the official process help my cousin? Then I was pleasantly surprised by the amazing results. Jonathan Glenn , Claimant's coworker I always knew that Claimant was fully innocent of all charges. Now I'm glad to be a part of process that can finally help liberate my friend. Daniel Walker , Claimant's father These have been some painful years waiting for the legal process to correct this mess. Thankfully, this alternative is finally helping to bring my child home. < Back Next >

Join the Need-Response Community to help develop this pioneering service of need-response. Become a member to help shape this service to address your particular needs. Help us all spread more love. Need-Responder Community Need-Responder Community members 1 Community Activity The quality of politics Politics is the art of generalizing how to agreeably address needs in differing social situations. This definition suggests three inherent ranges within politics, not of equal lateral value but of unequal vertical quality. Both conservatives and liberals (or progressives) suffer from decreased political quality, as public policies equally neglect their objectively existing prioritized needs. Politics Steph Turner 1 day ago 26 min read react culture - privileged reactions React culture consists of any social or cultural norm privileging anything less than properly resolving needs. Steph Turner Aug 4 10 min read Introducing Wellness Matters That’s exactly what the new program of Wellness Matters seeks to do. Bring both sides together for a win-win solution. Need-response process Steph Turner Jul 18 1 min read Groups Need-Responder Community Paying members · 4 Need-Responders Join B. I socially need... Public · 4 members Join C. I professionally need... Public · 3 Participants Join Anankelogy Principles Public · 3 members Join Personal Need-Responders Private · 3 Need-responders Request To Join Anankelogy Private · 2 students Request To Join Show More Stretch Your Comfort Zone (to improve your wellness) 2 Participants 4 Plans Available View Details Need-responder entry $5.00 or 6 Plans Available View Details Our groups you can join Become a member and join one of our engaging groups. Feed Anankelogy Principles Public · 3 members Join Steph Turner August 7, 2023 NR101 QNR In response to NR101 step 5.2: 1) My easement orientation: I would say I am more resolve-over-relieve oriented. But admit it may not seem so from other's perspective. 2) My relational orientation : I would say I am more specific-over-general oriented. I've always described myself as detail-oriented. But others may see me in a different light. 3) My conflict orientation : I would say you I am more open-over-closed oriented. Even to the point it may seem I am unwilling to fight where other's believe that fighting is the best option. I do think I'm often misperceived or my intent misinterpreted that way. I'm conscious of how identifying all three more favorably could draw some criticism. I invite others to kindly and graciously illuminate any of my blind spots. Maybe some view me as more relieving, as generalizing, or as closed in conflict. Characterizing my need-experience orientations as all positive cannot be… See More 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Steph Turner July 6, 2023 · updated the description of the group. NR101 QNR Follow this public group engaging our listed anankelogy principles . This also serves as space for those in our development programs engaging others with their chosen anankelogy principle. Let's apply these principles to our lives and talk about it here. 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Steph Turner July 6, 2023 · added a group cover image. NR101 QNR 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Gustavo Nascimento July 2, 2023 Should we trust politicians with the task of resolving our needs? Yes No Yes, depending on the need 0 2 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Sort by: Newest Steph Turner Jul 03, 2023 • If asked "with the help of Need-response" then maybe I could vote Yes. Now to find a way to bring Harmony Politics or Unifying Politics over to this site. Unifying Politics Like Show more replies Gustavo Nascimento July 2, 2023 Anankelogy is social science created to understand human needs. 0 0 Comments comments debug Write a comment... Write a comment... Show more archive

< Back Michigan Innocence Clinic not yet a parter Once a partner, find more information here about their case criteria, how to request for legal aid, along with any services. Previous Next

Love unleashes our life’s potential. < Back H05 Love Principle List of all principles Love unleashes our life’s potential. Image: Pixabay – UlisesEkzMoreno (click on meme to see source image) Summary The more you can fully resolve your needs in ways that enables you to respect the needs of others, the more of your full potential you can reach. You function better. You can do things better. Your wellness improves. You no longer must waste precious time and energy struggling to cope. You can invest your focus on continuing to resolve your needs and helping others to resolve theirs. It gets easier for you to do for them as you would have them do for you. Description Which would you prefer? Fend for yourself and avoid being vulnerable to others, since you only can trust yourself fully. OR Expand more of your life’s potential by cultivating meaningful and deep connections with others. Anankelogy As fewer of your needs fully resolve, you naturally cannot function as well as before. The less you can function, the quicker you naturally prioritize more essential matters. You must put your full potential on hold. As you go through modern life fending for yourself, you tend to fall prey to situations where your needs cannot fully resolve without the cooperation of others. Others are too busy fending for their own essentials. No one it seems fully resolves their needs. You don’t personally know anyone living up to their full potential, so you accept your lot as normal. If you dared to reach out to offer someone help, you know you risk being exploited. Despite the promises of modernity to make life easier, everyone seems to have it a little harder. And effectively become less loving than our recent communal ancestors. Need-response The more you honor the needs of others as your own, the more you inspire at least some of them to honor your needs as their own. You tap into your life’s potential when ready to boldly love another like no one has loved them before. Need-response provides an effective communication framework to honor their needs as much if not more than your own. It follows the praise sandwich format, to sandwich your less pleasant message about how they affect your needs between positive affirmations of them. POSITIVE: “Thank you for your [value to me].” NEGATIVE: “When you [act in a certain way, it affects my need].” POSITIVE: “The more you respond to my needs, the more I can faithfully respond to your needs.” For example, apply this to each other’s need to be better understood. P: “Thank you for listening to me and trying your best to relate to what I experienced.” N: “When you joked that I took things too personally, it felt like you didn’t fully understand.” P: “The more you can empathize with this traumatic experience, the easier I can relate to yours.” Here’s another example. P: “I appreciate that you took the time to ask me how I am doing.” N: “Saying ‘I’m fine’ is only half true, as I am still struggling to cope with all the harm.” P: “I trust I can share more, as your patient with me as I thoroughly grieve this terrible loss.” Keeping any unpleasant message squeezed between some positivity helps to sustain our potential to be more caring toward each other. Reactive Problem Yes, such engagement opens you to possible exploitation. Not everyone will respond in good faith. Some will assume you must have an ulterior motive. “Why are you trying to be so nice to me?” Others will reject your overtures of kindness for many reactive reasons. You counter exploitation or unresponsiveness with assertive need-response. You hold firm. Humble and firm. You persist in your intent, and not react with defensiveness. If others cannot appreciate your responsive effort, move on. Seek those you can trust to be more responsive to your offers of lovingkindness. Build your courage with early successes with them. Don’t let anyone detract you from the higher ideals of love. Don’t let anyone distract you from your full potential to spread more love in this world. Don’t let anyone or anything detach you from a deeper connection with all life Responsive Solution When you experience yourself as one with the universe, you intuitively recognize that whatever you do to others you ultimately do to yourself. At a profoundly deep level, we are all connected . Smile more often. See others smile in return. Offer small acts of kindness. Witness some reciprocate your generosity. When needing friendship, be a friend to them. Expand your social capital, your outlook on life, your potential to mature your empathy toward others. Relate to others as you would have them relate to you. Find someone who’s as responsive as you. Recharge each other’s batteries, likely drained from all those distrusting souls out there. Keep each other’s love alive. Get to know what others need, and how they need it. Humbly share your needs with them. Cultivate your trustworthiness by consistently respecting their needs. Show them how much you value them by your wiliness to put their interests ahead of your own. Let love be your guide. Grow your lovingkindness reputation by letting your consistent concern for others keep you predictable. Let this keep you open to being loved by caring others. Be honest about your mistakes, your shortcomings, your emotional wounds still healing, your times of doubt and distrust, your fears of being hurt again, and your willingness to risk more pain to reach more of your potential to love and be loved. Be resilient, by getting back up after being knocked down time and time again. Let your equanimity keep your love unshakeable. Let your maturing love permeate your life like your life depends upon it—because it ultimately does! Responding to your needs How does this principle speak to your experience of needs? Post in our Engagement forum your thoughtful response to one of these: It’s hard to love others who keep rejecting my sincere kindness. Love often gets confused with sex, and that’s a problem I like to see addressed. Emotional intimacy plays a key role, rejected by those fearing such intimacy. I find it excruciatingly difficult to love others while self-absorbed in so much pain. Instead of selecting one of these, post your own engagement feedback about your experience with the subject of this principle. Remember the aim is to improve our responsiveness to each other’s needs, toward their full resolution. If you’re new at posting here, first check the guide below. Engage this principle in our forum Engagement guide Any visitor to the Engagement forum can view all posts. So do keep that in mind when posting. Sign up or sign in to comment on these posts and to create your own posts. Using this platform assumes you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . Remember to keep the following in mind: Quote the principle you are responding to, and its identifier letter & number. Let’s be specific. Demonstrate need-responsiveness in your interactions here. Let’s respect each other. Engage supportive feedback from others on this platform. Let’s grow together. Together, let’s improve our need-responsiveness . Together, let’s spread some love . See other principles in this category - Foundational - Basic - General - Pain - Conflict - Authority - Law - Love - Previous Facebook X (Twitter) WhatsApp LinkedIn Pinterest Copy link Next

Anankelogy is the new social science for understanding your needs. Need-response is the visionary service for overcoming barriers to resolve your stubborn needs. The Need-Response podcast introduces you to this alternative service. The Need-Responder Community coalesces to create this dynamic service for you. Solving our general problems by resolving your specific needs by first replacing adversarialism with mutuality The new social science of anankelogy establishes your natural needs as objective facts . That's a ga me changer. Your inflexible needs cannot change for anyone. Not for laws. Not for authority. Not even for yourself. We start there. Learn more I-need messages prototype Need-response service Need-response seeks to solve public problems insufficiently addressed by the adversarial legal process. For example, the problem of not identifying and clearing the vast volume of wrongly convicted innocent persons in prison and beyond. The first specialized need-response service is Exoneration Services. It complements or competes with the slow moving legal process relied upon by the innocence movement . If you or someone you know is a wrongly convicted innocent person, and feel disillusioned by the innocence movement , this could be just what you need. If you are wrongly convicted and innocent of any role in the reported offense, this service is for you. Prove your innocence without lawyers Exoneration Services Learn more Solving the public problem of legalistic adversarialism by applying a more loving approach to exonerate the wrongly convicted innocent Exoneration Services Estimate the viability of your innocence claim. Get an instant result. Upload the results to create your Innocence Profile. Leverage toward Public Exoneration. Public Exoneration Establish your innocence beyond the confines of legalistic adversarialism. Engage and incentivize the public to recognize your overlooked innocence. Declaring Innocence Quickly convey your demonstrable innocence to the DA. Incentivize them to review your case based more on observable facts than law. Broadcast Innocence If the DA fails to promptly recognize your identified innocence, we take your case to the public. We let the people face the facts. Publicly Declare Innocence Let this short video introduce you to this fresh approach to justice. Learn more All programs Power problem solution Exoneration Services Publicly Declare Your Innocence 1 Participant $49.48 View Details Limited $20 off discount: Enter coupon code PDI-29.48. “We know without doubt that the vast majority of innocent defendants who are convicted of crimes are never identified and cleared.” - Samuel Gross, editor of the National Registry of Exonerations , as reported in 2015 in the Washington Post . [ click here to view ] F ollow the Need-Response podcast to discover what we're doing about it. The Need-Response podcast F ollow developments of this new service on our podca st every other Wednesday. Help shape it wih your input. Podcast episodes Together, we can build a more responsive alternative. How? Join the conversation every other Wednesday to learn how you can help shape this new service. Need-Responder Community Join us to help shape this pioneering service We'll not annoy you with requests to support us on Patreon. We get right to the point. By supporting this podcast, you help us build a better future for yourself. Start for free and see for yourself if this isn't what you've been yearning for . 3 Membership Tiers 1. Follower - FREE: Orientation Familiarize yourself to the potential of this new service. 2. Supporter - $5/month: Engagement Engage us to shape this into something for your needs. 3. Contributor - $25/month: Participation Help create this new service and potential for income. Learn more solving problems by resolving needs solving problems by resolving needs solving problems by resolving needs solving problems by resolving needs