Need-response emerges as a new professional service to complement, or potentially compete with, the adversarial judicial system to serve the public’s justice needs. Only need-response emphasizes understanding the unresolved needs fueling conflicts, and how to more effectively respond to such needs. We invite everyone working within the judicial system to engage this fresh approach to serving one another’s underserved needs.

You can use the Estimated Innocence Form to complement those forms required by innocence litigators. You can ask your local innocence...

Dr. Carrie Leonetti of Aukland University identifies a list of 27 factors contributing to wrongly convicting the innocent. They complement the Estimated Innocence Form.

We know there are far more innocence claimants than innocence litigators to review their viable innocence claims. Are you one of them?

Disgusted with the adversarial justice system? Consider the emerging alternative of need-response, a new professional service in develop

The law can only do so much. Need-response takes us beyond minimal legal standards to respond directly to the needs our laws exist to serve.

My pioneering efforts to end depression continue to be resisted by authorities perpetuating injustice.

The disappointing failures of the adversarial legal system warrants a more responsive alternative

My first attempt at podcasting last four weeks. I used BlogTalkRadio. Which has discontinued service.

Toxic legalism prioritizes laws over serving the needs for which they exist. Here are at least 5 ways we slip into such legalistic disarray.

This new free tool supplements the Estimated Innocence Report. It challenges unresponsive courts with a more responsive alternative.